• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

Goleta’s Shelby Trust Moves Toward Re-zone, Development

The City of Goleta took a giant step toward converting its remaining agricultural lands into urban use, starting with the Shelby Trust’s 14-acre parcel on the city’s edge.


Thursday, February 21, 2008
By Martha Sadler
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

The City of Goleta took a giant step toward converting its remaining agricultural lands into urban use, starting with the Shelby Trust’s 14-acre parcel on the city’s edge. On a 3-2 vote — with Roger Aceves and Jonny Wallis dissenting, and against the recommendations of City Planning Staff — the council chose on Tuesday, February 19, to initiate 12 General Plan amendments that will allow the trust to build 75 homes on its land at 7400 Cathedral Oaks Road.

City staff had recommended denial of the Shelby proposal on several grounds, one being that the city already has an excess of residentially zoned parcels and a dozen large housing projects underway. Additionally, four previous Environmental Impact Reports concluded that the property is viable agricultural land. Last but not least, the city’s General Plan calls for the preservation of the city’s remaining urban farmland. In fact, one of the dozen passages that the Shelby Trust will now work with Goleta City staff on amending currently states that conversion of agriculturally zoned lands to other uses “shall not be allowed.” The Shelby Trust’s proposed amendment changes that to “may be allowed.”

Architect Mark Lloyd and attorney Chip Wullbrandt spoke on behalf of the Shelby Trust, which not only sued the city over its general plan last year but also contributed financially, along with other agricultural landowners, to the present City Council majority election campaigns. They told the council that the Shelby property is not viable for agriculture because of underlying clay and, moreover, is not economically viable because it is too small and too close to urban development.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

With the Goleta Chamber of Commerce now running the City Council, we will wish we had stayed in the County. I remember Jean Blois used to say she supported keeping Ag land as Ag. I guess she changed her mind when she got the word from the Chamber. Pity.

Goletaman (anonymous profile)
February 21, 2008 at 10:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I find the actions of the Goleta City Council's .... pro-growth majority saddening and infuriating. They are now voting against their own staff recommendations to build, build, build! (See article from the S.B. Independent below.)

Shame on you Eric, Michael and Jean! What a disappointment your actions are! PLEASE wake up and realize what you are doing to our wonderful community or your legacy will be one of destruction and a drastically reduced standard of living. PLEASE start acting on all of the public input AGAINST further growth which you received!

The problems caused by rampant, irresponsible growth do not just affect the residents of Goleta, but rather the greater community as well. Being hemmed in by mountains on one side and the ocean on the other is one of the things that makes our beautiful community unique. It also puts us at risk in the case of a natural or other disaster. With our current population we would already find ourselves in dire straits as we all attempt to flee via our ONLY main artery, the impacted 101 freeway. How can anyone believe that MORE building, more rampant growth can be good for our town or for southern S.B. county?

We deserve better, YOUR own families deserve better. It is time to do what is best for our community, not for the handful who will benefit financially from all of this development. You were elected by the people and I cannot imagine that most of us knew the building frenzy which would result during your tenure. Do you honestly see yourselves being REelected by your constituents if you keep this up? I hopefully urge you to reconsider your stances.

Roger and Jonny, I applaud your efforts to do the responsible thing! Impossible when you are outnumbered.... I would also like to thank Martha Sadler and the S.B. Independent for reporting on this issue.

Knowing Eric and his family personally, this is a difficult email to send, but I feel so strongly about this issue that I must do so.

Sincerely,

Liz Zok
Goleta resident since 1988

elaz (anonymous profile)
February 21, 2008 at 10:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Amazing. The power of a reporter's perspective. I watched the hearing on TV the other night, as I do most Goleta hearings. Martha Sadler's coverage was one-sided and that is disappointing. I agree with her that what I witnessed was a landowner saying her property isn't viable for agriculture, therefore she was asking for a rezone to residential. But I didn't hear the council support this notion; in fact they spent a great deal of time talking about what true, viable agriculture is, and how should the city define this. It turns out the city doesn't have detailed definitions of what exactly constitutes good agricultural land. Both the landowner and the council majority agreed that there should be more fact finding here in an effort to get to the bottom of this. What I heard from Eric Onnen is that once a bottom line is established regarding true, viable farmland, then this project or others either WILL or WILL NOT qualify as such. Now, Martha Sadler didn't mention any of this and that is why I'm disappointed. I depend upon the Indy as a trustworthy news source. Flaming angst in our community thru either biased or insufficient reporting is unacceptable.

molly (anonymous profile)
February 21, 2008 at 11:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)

The 250-word limit on this for-print story didn't leave much room for detail, but I think I got it right. You can watch the February 19 meeting replayed on Channel 19 at 5 p.m. on Saturday, February 23.

martha (Martha Sadler)
February 22, 2008 at 10:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I'll never understand how things like this happens. You people have been to LA, right? Or at least seen pictures? Urban sprawl sucks.

srev (anonymous profile)
February 22, 2008 at 9:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Mist
Temperature:
59.0°
Wind:
7 E

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Info
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • Taxi Timebomb
  • Fiesta Preview
  • The Tragic End of Gregory Ghan
  • The Big Bow-Wowski
  • Local Label and Studio Stand Alone
  • Remembering Jim Zant, Teacher, Notre Dame Irish Fanatic, and My Little Brother
  1. Miramar Decision Postponed Until August 6
  2. Mental Health Budget Slashed After All
  3. Closure of Goleta Center Leaves Moms-to-Be One Less Choice
  4. Catalytic Converters Stolen in Santa Barbara
  5. Obituary for Ralph Auf der Heide
  6. Introducing Los Olivos Roots Organic Farm
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.