Students at UCSB - and across the University of California system - are responding to a recent decision to cut back on freshman enrollment as a result of the state budget crisis. The UC Regents, under recommendation from UC President Mark Yudof, have voted to reduce first-year students by 2,300, or about six percent, for the next incoming class, in fall 2009.
The bad news keeps coming - Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s proposed budget for the next fiscal year includes a $275 million cut to the already-suffering UC budget, as well as continued increases in tuition, perhaps as high as nine percent.
Student leaders say they are concerned about the accessibility and quality of college education. Increasing the difficulty to get into a UC college will likely further disadvantage applicants from low-performing public high schools and those without access to SAT preparation programs. “To me personally, this is devastating,” said David Preciado, a UCSB sophomore who came from a single-parent household of limited means. “This will affect students of color from under-represented communities. There are already barriers to the educational system.” Indeed, UC officials admit there may be a “slight” decrease in minority admissions.
Preciado is a leader in UCSB’s Student Lobby, a program of the Associated Students organization. He’s also active with the University of California Student Association (UCSA), and the United States Student Association (USSA).
A recent meeting of the University of California Student Association was abuzz with fears that university officials, in their financial desperation, would allow more out-of-state students into the UC system. On average, an undergrad from California pays about $8,000 in registration fees. A non-resident student pays about $28,000. Some UC regents have suggested this strategy as a way to raise revenue, and while the official UC position is that there are no plans to increase out-of-state admissions, Yudof has indicated it’s a possibility.
“What’s the point of a public education system?” asked Preciado, throwing up his hands. “This contradicts that. The university is becoming privatized.”
The enrollment cutback plan provides insight into the political power held by individual UC campuses. Popular UCLA and UC Berkeley will not be affected, nor will UC Merced - but for different reasons. The university has been trying to grow enrollment at Merced, the newest campus, located far from a city with nightclubs, performance venues, and other attractions appealing to young people. Under the new enrollment scheme, fewer students will be accepted to the in-demand campuses, and instead, receive an invitation to those campuses that have “capacity,” meaning Merced. For now, the admissions restrictions will be in effect for the 2009-10 school year.
Paul Wellman (file)
UC president Mark Yudof (left) at his first meeting of the UC regents at UCSB in 2008
At the same time UC announced the enrollment cuts, it revealed the salaries of top UC administrators will be frozen through the summer of 2010. For the next 18 months, President Yudof’s salary will be frozen at an annual $828,000 - $591,000 base pay plus 237,000 in other compensation. UCSB Chancellor Henry Yang’s income will be frozen at $324,000 per year. Notably, rank-and-file university employees have not received pay increases this year, so their salaries are essentially frozen too.
UC spokesperson Paul Schwartz said the entire university is over-enrolled by 11,000 students, and the state is not providing funding for them. “We simply cannot operate without adequate public support,” he said. “It’s a balancing act on our part.” Schwartz added that Yudof felt capping salaries at the top was another important cost-saving measure. “It’s consistent with our obligation as a public institution,” he said.
Preciado and other UC student activists have begun collaborating with their counterparts in the Cal State University and California Community Colleges systems, which also have been hit hard by budget cuts. All are looking ahead to the UCSA Student Lobby Conference in Sacramento at the end of February. One idea they may promote is a one percent income tax on the state’s wealthiest residents to fund higher education.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
Do you even know how enrollment strategies work? Get your head out of your arse and understand that UC Merced 1) has something to offer students unique to itself, 2) there is a nightlife and day-life in the Merced community, 3) UC Merced is "in demand" -- this year UCM actually surpassed its enrollment goals, and is expected to indefinitely, despite ignorant Valley bashing from people who have never visited campus or had a conversation with a UC Merced student. 4) A campus does not become 25,000 in 3.5 years. UC Merced's growth is unprecedented in the UC system. These efforts are possible thanks to the unparalleled passion of its students, faculty and staff, in addition to the incredible support from its sister UC campuses and the Merced community.
I went to UC Merced. It was my first choice and it was my ONLY choice. It is a campus where students can take a larger share of ownership in its progress, in addition to taking an active role in campus- and system-wide development. It is a campus where all the lab equipment, beds in the dorms, and library are brand new. It is a campus whose infrastructure is the most state of the art both in performance and environmental stewardship.
I was eligible to attend all 9 undergraduate UC campuses. I destroyed the other UC campus students, academically, while studying abroad -- so anyone who thinks UC Merced is a second choice to all, or that they are hurting for students, is more than welcome to contact me at my personal email address, joshua.s.bolin@gmail.com, for clarification.
Best,
Joshua Bolin
UCM '07
Valleyknowledge (anonymous profile)
January 20, 2009 at 9:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Joshua Bolin:
We are glad you are a University of California graduate, but you need to heed the UC motto FIAT LUX and actually try again to illuminate your reading comprehension and understand what this news article was about and the sources interviewed for it.
--David Pritchett
UCSB '86
David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
January 20, 2009 at 11:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
David,
I will go toe to toe with you in any reading comprehension competition or other critical forum, any day of the week and twice on Sundays. That being said, you need to understand the underlying unwarranted assumptions in the article. It is inaccurate, offensive, and short-sighted to use these assumptions to prop up another issue, regardless of intent.
Best,
Joshua
Valleyknowledge (anonymous profile)
January 20, 2009 at 4:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The reason for high educational costs is simple. The government subsidizes student loans directly as well as indirectly by decreasing the interest rate to lend below the market rate. It's the same mechanism that caused the housing bubble.
The large influx of student loans allows the Universities to increase their budgets to abnormally high levels, so when the economy received it's awakening to reality, the source of funding from student loans dries up, the budget stays relatively the same and the school has to raise tuition for the few students who can afford to attend.
These ideas have been taken from the only former 2008 Presidential candidate who understands our economy and wants to end our overseas empire to help save the economy. Ron Paul was right. Obama is going to be a huge disappointment. He will not end our overseas empire, in fact he will probably expand it. Since we don't have any money, they will print it, and we will see huge amounts of inflation and price increases. People on fixed incomes will not be in good shape, not to mention the job losses and general destruction of our economy.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
January 21, 2009 at 11:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The Economy will 'TANK' by june of 2009, Oh Praise our Savior. President Obama!!!!!!!!!
dou4now (anonymous profile)
January 24, 2009 at 9:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)