• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Venoco Proposes Ditching Ellwood Barge for New Pipeline

    Switch Poses Pros, Cons to Company, City of Goleta, Environment


    Saturday, May 16, 2009
    By Benjamin Gottlieb (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Offshore barging operations at Ellwood Beach may soon cease, following a proposal Venoco Inc. made earlier this week for a new 8.5-mile subterranean oil transport pipeline.

    Submitted to Santa Barbara County and Goleta City officials this past Wednesday, the tube would allow Ellwood Pipeline Inc. — a subsidiary of Venoco Inc. — to purge its offshore barging operation and onshore marine terminal at Ellwood by 2010, according to Venoco representatives. The new underground pipeline would connect to the existing Plains All-American Pipeline near Las Flores Canyon and would be equipped with advanced control valves and a leak detection system.

    Venoco’s current Ellwood oil facility consists of an ocean platform, Platform Holly, which sends gas and oil to shore in a pipeline to the Ellwood Onshore Facility (EOF) between the Sandpiper Golf Course and Bacara Resort & Spa. After processing, the oil then travels via another pipeline along Hollister Avenue to Pacific Oaks Road on route to the Ellwood Marine Terminal, where two storage tanks are fixed on the UCSB mesa.

    The proposed pipeline route — which begins at Platform Holly — would travel under Highway 101 and then west along the north side of the freeway. The planned route would put an end to the biweekly transportation of the oil by the single hulled barge, Jovalon, which loads some 65,000 barrels of oil from the Ellwood Marine terminal and hauls it off to either Los Angeles or San Francisco.

    Goleta City councilmember Margaret Connell said the plan, though attractive in that it proposes removing all coastal oil operations from Goleta proper, is not without its flaws. “The good thing about it is that it means the Ellwood marine terminal on the [UCSB] mesa would go away sooner and the barging of oil would soon cease,” Connell said. “That would be excellent… We have a lot of complaints on the barging of oil. On the downside, this could very likely mean the Ellwood onshore facility could be there for a long, long time.”

    In service since the late 1920s, the Ellwood Marine Terminal first transported oil from the Ellwood field from a number of piers along the coastline. According to Steve Greig, agent for the Ellwood Pipeline, the new system would allow for the removal of the marine terminal and barging operation, thus ending more than 80 years of operations adjacent to the Devereux Slough, the Coal Oil Point Reserve, and the Ellwood Mesa City Park. “We know the community is as anxious as we are to see this pipeline in place,” Greig said, in a prepared statement. “Transporting oil by pipeline is consistent with the city and county policies. UCSB will enjoy the new open space and visitors to the Ellwood Mesa won’t see the barge visiting every 11 days.”

    Still hanging in the balance are Venoco’s plans to slant drill from Platform Holly into an oil field east of the current oil field. Connell said although the plans to end barging were once contingent upon the allotment of the new drilling expanse, Venoco Inc. announced that it will move forward to end barging before a decision is reached. “It’s an interesting thing, Venoco making this move,” Connell said. “Up into this point they’d say we’d make the pipeline if we get the slant drilling, so now they are going to do it without it.”

    From the Goleta standpoint, Connell said that if Venoco is permitted to build its own pipeline, they could potentially have their own oil processing outfit outside of the Los Flores Canyon facilities. “Our goal as a city is to remove all industrial oil operations from our coastal areas,” Connell said. “There are a lot of issues about this extended field drilling. There is an environmental impact report on the slant drilling, which we don’t have it. The environmental preferred alternative is to have a pipeline go offshore and have the oil go there.”

    Benjamin Gottlieb is an Independent intern.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Connell states “Our goal as a city is to remove all industrial oil operations from our coastal areas,” ...and put it in someone else's back yard so Santa Barbarians don't have to look at it? Sounds like the usual statements....lets let someone else look at oil operations while we continue to enjoy the use of fossil fuels. Hypocracy. I also think the county should encourage drilling as an increase in tax revenues. As Arnold is selling off state landmarks I wouldn't be surprised to see him pushing for more drilling too!

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    rantumscoot (anonymous profile)
    May 16, 2009 at 7:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    California imports two thirds of its energy and thereby exports environmental issues to other areas and contributes heavily to the need for the US to import foreign oil. California is essentially bankrupt. California continues to be the "spoiled child" of the US, with recent polls indicating that Californians want no reduction in services and no increases in taxes while funding some of the highest public employee costs in the nation and facing a $21 Billion budget deficit in a single year. 1/2 of 1% of Californians pay 50% of California's income tax and still the Left wants to increase taxes on the "rich" (defined as anyone making more than you). California wants to be environmentally pure while consuming enormous amounts of imported oil. California is beautiful and full of truly schizophrenic voters. Unless Californians grow up and face reality, this beautiful state will become a wasteland. The 1/2 of 1% will leave the state for more friendly tax states, and those remaining will weep and wail about budget problems (ever heard of the Golden Goose fable? it's alive and well and no fable in this state). Much of the U.S. will say to California: "you deserve it". Sad future for the Golden (tarnished) State.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
    May 16, 2009 at 9:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    County policy mandates that any new oil production from the channel waters be processed at a Consolidated Facility. The only Consolidated Facility on the South Coast is Exxon's at Las Flores Canyon. While Exxon may continue to resist sharing their facility with other oil produces in the end it must. And the pipeline to connect Venoco's platform Holly to Las Flores will not be a land pipeline but rather a sub sea pipeline. The communities highest priority should and must be the relocation of the Ellwood Onshore Facility to the Las Flores Consolidated Oil and Gas Processing Facility.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    gaviotamilitia (anonymous profile)
    May 17, 2009 at 9:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    This is a complex issue with many stakeholders. I think it is a move in the right direction and am glad Venoco has a proposal that makes sense to them. It should be thoughly reviewed by civil engeeneering folks for safety in case of earthquakes and shutting down segments in case of breaches.I am curious if the reperter could inform us of how much tax revenue the state sees from natural resouce developement and use.I hope the comunity works with Venoco.I visited Louisiana where oil companies slant drill from beyond state limits and the state gets no revenues at all from having its oil pumped out and is left economically destitute going begging for federal money all the time.Lets make sure the local state and comunity get a share of the revenue produced at least.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    rabbitrun (anonymous profile)
    May 18, 2009 at 10:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Scattered Clouds
    Temperature:
    62.1°
    Wind:
    5 S

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • Within the Syuxtun Story Circle
    • Camellia Sasanqua
    • Whole New Ballgame
    • Gratuitous Gore on Highway 154
    • Saul Williams Brings Afro-Punk Tour to Velvet Jones
    • Where There’s a Dill, There’s a Way
    1. Travis Armstrong Is Outta There
    2. S.B. Bank & Trust's Rocky Year
    3. UC Campuses Dominate Rankings
    4. What buildings did architect Julia Morgan design in Santa Barbara?
    5. Sexile
    6. Rattlesnake and San Roque Side of Jesusita Trails to Re-Open Friday
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.