Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us.
Digg!
furl
google
newsvine
reddit
technorati
Facebook
Yahoo!UCLA and the National Park Service have teamed up to combat weeds. The university’s Center for Embedded Network Sensing (CENS) and the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area developed a cell phone app to locate invasive plant species within national parks, which will help park service workers. The What’s Invasive! app is designed for use by citizen scientists, as well as park workers who, over the course of their normal duties, spot invasive plants out in the field. What’s Invasive! recently expanded to the Channel Islands National Park, where seven invasives are currently being monitored. Users can also set up their own park on the What’s Invasive! website and start collecting data.
Invasive species are non-native plants that become harmful to the native environment. They often displace native plants, which are an important food source for local animals. Many invasive species are more flammable than native species, in addition to using more water and having shallower roots, which can contribute to soil erosion.
The National Park Service recently conducted a two-week trial run of What’s Invasive! in 1,000 locations in the Santa Monica mountains with very positive results, according to Laura Newman, Policy and External Affairs Manager at the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Center. “We sent out park staff with the phone and they were able to catalogue an enormous number of invasive species just in the course of their everyday jobs,” Newman said.
While park staff will play a large role in data collection, Eric Graham, CENS staff ecologist, explained What’s Invasive!’s conception: “One of the ideas of this What’s Invasive! campaign was to say ‘Well, hey, we’ve got a whole lot of hikers who use these trails every day and if we can leverage these people, then they can convey this info to the National Park Service, and we can use everyday citizen scientists to walk around and spot these things.’”
The application currently works on all Android G1 cell phones and CENS expects to have an application for iPhone ready for all national parks by the end of the month. (Presently only Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area has an iPhone app.) And for those citizen hikers without iPhones or Androids: Any phone capable of taking a picture can convey valuable data to Park Service workers.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Previous Month
Comments
Discussion Guidelines
This is a nice use the power of social networks. Good job NPS and UCLA.
Too bad about this, however:
::: "The application currently works on all Android G1 cell phones and CENS expects to have an application for iPhone ready for all national parks by the end of the month."
binky (anonymous profile)
January 6, 2010 at 3:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Subsidiarity, not centralization!
This is a good example of crowd-sourcing, though this technical application of 'science' may leave us rich in means, but poor in ends.
To demonstrate I suggest you consider the following words: 'sustainable,' 'green,' 'natural,' and 'organic.' They have been misused and overly simplified, which has lead to marginalization and confusion of these once meaningful words.
Good conservation policy requires sound understanding 'of' and 'with' the natural world. A computer program can not have the 'with' no matter how advanced it is, nor can a faraway 'expert' know what is best for a locale.
Rather than doing the popular thing-building a flashy web App-UCLA would be better to further educate it's students on becoming better observers of nature and natural systems. If they were really ambitious I would suggest they foster a social environment which rewarded human scale stewardship that would serve all people, not just the NPS, rather than one based on some absolute scientific opinion that centralizes information to such bureaucracy it cannot adapt to natural diversity. What we need is smarter people, not more technology or 'technical managers.' Nature seems to have quite a good way of working things out on its own.
Further disappointing is the marketing effort by UCLA and NPS, of this product, by portraying of mere plants as terrifying beasts, this is overly dramatic and offensive. Nature should never be seen as some obstacle to avoid or fear, but something we should embrace, we must be reminded it is the natural world that gives us our sustenance. Any problems we face with nature are cultural in origin.
The efforts of conservation will continue to fail as long as we think we can delegate stewardship to another.
Tucker (anonymous profile)
January 20, 2010 at 2:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)