The great smart-meter debate came to the Santa Barbara City Council this week, and, much like the freak-out fest at the county supervisors on the same topic early last month, the public turned out en masse to declare their concern and distrust about the soon-to-be-unleashed in-home electricity usage monitoring devices. Worried that the tentatively scheduled rollout of the wireless smart meters in area homes starting next February by Southern California Edison — being done in the name of energy mindfulness and conservation — will bring with it a host of both known and unknown adverse health effects while simultaneously violating the privacy rights of those being “watched” by the devices, a largely anti–smart-meter crowd urged the City Council to do all it could to prevent the coming invasion of controversial contraptions while also urging the responsible parties to properly investigate the potential long-term impacts of such a device radiating in homes throughout the state.
The discussion, which was brought to the council by members Michael Self and Randy Rowse, concluded with a 4-2 vote in favor of sending a letter to the California Public Utility Commission (the CPUC is the state entity that approved utility companies’ use of the devices in 2008 and has actual jurisdiction over the matter) echoing most of the worry spoken by their constituents and the desire to have more research done on the potential impacts. The letter, however, much to the dismay of Councilmembers Dale Francisco and Self (both of whom found themselves on the losing side of the vote) did not include a council-endorsed request for the CPUC to create a free opt-out program for would-be smart-meter victims, something that many public speakers hoped the letter would accomplish. Currently, the smart-meter plan does allow for customers to opt out, but they have to pay a fee to do so.
Related Links
- Undumbing the Grid [ July 28, 2011 ]
- Smart Meter Smack Down [ July 6, 2011 ]


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
MUST-SEE 4-minute youtube video on Smart meters:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=...
Research (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2011 at 2:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
SMART METER HEALTH PROBLEMS AND CANCER.
A. The WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION on May 31 2011 placed the Non-ionizing radiation coming from Wireless smart meters (and some other wireless devices) on the Class 2-B Carcinogen List.
http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr...
B. The NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH months ago (Feb 2011) found biological changes in the brain after only minutes of exposure to non-ionizing radiation.
http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/305/...
C. LABORATORY SCIENTISTS have observed
(1) Human Cell Damage
(2) DNA Chain Breaks
(3) Breaches in the Blood-Brain Barrier
from levels of non-ionizing radiation lower than emitted by WIRELESS Smart meters.
http://electromagnetichealth.org/elec...
D. INSURANCE COMPANIES Hired Independent Laboratory Scientists and these scientists also observed Cell Damage and DNA Chain Breaks and now the Insurance Companies will NOT Insure Liability from damage from Wireless Smart meters and other wireless devices.
TV Video (3 minutes)
http://eon3emfblog.net/?p=382
So shouldn’t MANDATORY installation of Wireless smart meters on people's homes STOP?
Because Cell Phone use and other devices are Voluntary and can be shut off at the user’s discretion, that is a different issue.
1. WIRELESS SMART METERS – 100 TIMES MORE RADIATION THAN CELL PHONES.
Video Interview: Nuclear Scientist, Daniel Hirsch, (5 minutes).
http://stopsmartmeters.org/2011/04/20...
2. WIRELESS SMART METERS – CANCER, NERVOUS SYSTEM DAMAGE, ADVERSE REPRODUCTION AFFECTS.
Video Interview: Dr. Carpenter, New York Public Health Department, Dean of Public Health, (2 minutes).
http://emfsafetynetwork.org/?p=3946
3. THE KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE IN STOCKHOLM (the University that gives the Nobel Prizes) ISSUES GLOBAL HEALTH WARNING AGAINST WIRELESS SMART METERS.
2-page Press Release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48148346/Ka...
4. RADIATION MEASURED FROM SMART METER MOUNTED ON A HOME (once active in the utility system) SHOWS RADIATION BURST PULSES APPROXIMATELY ONCE EVERY FOUR SECONDS 24 HOURS PER DAY traveling through the bodies and brains of the inhabitants of that home.
Youtube Video (6 minutes, 1st minute is sufficient).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRejDx...
Research (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2011 at 2:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Research must work the night shift.
Rowse, Self, Francisco and Hotchkiss could have a point; but it is so hard to tell when they're all as nutty as a holiday fruitcake.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2011 at 7:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
In a new fact sheet, the Environmental Defense Fund summarizes the benefits of smart meters — and puts smart meter radio frequency (RF) emissions in perspective.
EDF says: “America’s outdated energy system is wasteful, expensive, and a huge source of pollution.”
Also: “By making smart investments in a ‘smart’ green grid, we can greatly reduce our use of dirty energy, improve air quality and the health of millions of Americans1 affected by dangerous air pollution, and advance our energy independence and economic growth.”
Here is the fact sheet: http://www.edf.org/documents/11672_Sm...
ckingaei (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2011 at 8:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Smart meter surveillance? Interesting perspective.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=...
Georgy (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2011 at 9:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I could not see that meeting because I had a long wireless cell phone call going on as I held the phone up to my head for an hour. I then saved my right to privacy and my personal data as I got some discounts at Ralphs with my member card scanned there as I made my purchases.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2011 at 10:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I read much of the information posted by Research (first post). These articles are about cellphones, not smart meters, as Research says. Research is a liar.
byronsnake (anonymous profile)
August 12, 2011 at 10:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Follow the money. SCE is spending a lot of money on these new meters. They tell you it is for your convenience and to save you money. They also say this will save the environment. Only a fool wouild believe any of this. They are going to charge more for peak hour usage and will make a lot more money off their customers.
DanVac (anonymous profile)
August 12, 2011 at 1:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Controversial not only here, but in Australia, as well.
"Smart meters are sometimes being installed without consent and against the wishes of property owners."
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/sur...
anemonefish (anonymous profile)
August 13, 2011 at 12:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Considering the scientific evidence is overwhelming that smart meters are dangerous, it appears that industry shills are fast at work trying to cover up the truth. Freak show? No, sorry. Selling America to the highest bidder? Yes, you are, when you allow utilities to come onto our property and place on our homes harmful devices that destroy our health and privacy. What is next, dragging us into the streets and killing us? We simply cannot allow our safety to be compromised. Visit An Open Letter to the La Mesa City Council: Stop the SDG&E Smart Meters on http://lamesa.patch.com/articles/an-o..., watch the YouTube videos, see the documents. This is quite, unfortunately real and everyone needs to wake up and stop the smart meters. www.smartmeterdangers.org
ConcernedCitizen91942 (anonymous profile)
August 13, 2011 at 11:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)