The American Action Network (AAN) — a right-of-center advocacy group — has put Rep. Lois Capps in the crosshairs with a new web ad campaign this week and, according to Politico, is planning to spend at least $10 million on races like the one for the 24th Congressional District here in California.
A new online video released Monday morning asks Capps, along with California Reps. John Garamendi and Jerry McNerney, to repeal Obamacare, which all three voted for. “How far will they go to protect Obama’s agenda?” the ad asks, splicing together clips of the Three Stooges with sound bites from former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.
A repeal vote on the Affordable Care Act is scheduled for Wednesday.
AAN unleashed a $1.2 million campaign, which includes direct mail, print advertising, and robocalls in nearly three dozen districts. “It’s time,” said Dan Conston, AAN communications director, in a statement. “Time for Congresswoman Capps to finally help her constituents by repealing Obamacare and this disastrous healthcare law.”
Capps, who has served in Congress since 1998, is facing former lieutenant governor Abel Maldonado in the 24th District. While the newly redrawn district leans slightly Democratic, the race is shaping up to be Capps’s greatest challenge since winning the office.
The web video comes just a couple of weeks after the National Republican Congressional Committee also made the three members of Congress the focus of their first ad buys.
Said Capps campaign spokesperson Jeff Millman: “This is another lame attempt to change the subject from Abel Maldonado’s refusal to pay the $4.2 million he owes in federal back taxes. Central Coast voters will not allow Maldonado to hide behind SuperPAC ads and avoid explaining why he won’t pay his taxes and made improper deductions for personal expenses, like his home remodeling and country club membership.”


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Sure hope this AAN didn't fork over a lot of dough for this amateurish piece , obviously constructed to appeal to lower I.Q. levels.
geeber (anonymous profile)
July 9, 2012 at 5:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I hope whoever owns the Three Stooges is made aware of this ad. I would be furious.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
July 9, 2012 at 6:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Copyright laws can be nasty.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
July 9, 2012 at 7:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Let's see...I tell a politician to repeal something they've already approved and they'll turn around and say "I suppose you're right" and repeal it. Right?
I think my I.Q. dropped 10 points as a result of watching this ad.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
July 9, 2012 at 7:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Oh! Wise Guy Eh?!
dou4now (anonymous profile)
July 10, 2012 at 5:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Awesome concluding quote by the Capps staffer.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
July 10, 2012 at 11:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Funny you should say that, John_Adams, when I first read (Jeff Millman's)“This is another lame attempt to change the subject from Abel Maldonado’s refusal to pay the $4.2 million he owes in federal back taxes," I thought, what a clumsy and obvious reply.
He shoulda said something like 'Mr. Maldonado's backers could better spend their money on helping him pay-off his current back tax obligations,' and leave it at that.
The quote above is so 'I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I?' and smacks of campaign rhetoric.
Chester_Arthur_Burnett (anonymous profile)
July 10, 2012 at 12:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree - the Capps response is idiotic.
SezMe (anonymous profile)
July 11, 2012 at 2:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It's an unfortunate state of affairs for district 24 voters when our choices include a progressive incumbent who voted for Obamacare and couldn't formulate an intelligent argument for it to save her life, and a back-stabbing RINO on the other side who made deals to raise taxes during a recession, while dodging taxes on his family business.
Maybe in 2014 voters will wise up.
bandito (anonymous profile)
July 11, 2012 at 9:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)