A report on deaths among homeless people in Santa Barbara County — based on data gathered in 2009 and 2010 — revealed that 86 percent of those who passed away in that time were male and that a majority struggled with both mental illness and drugs or alcohol. Over the two-year span of data collection, 79 deceased homeless were identified in the county, according to Public Health officials in a report to the Board of Supervisors Tuesday.
Of those identified, 86 percent were U.S. citizens and 14 percent were veterans. Officials said 30 of the deaths were from natural causes, 28 were because of accidents, one was a suicide, and three involved trauma. Alcohol and drug abuse led to 46 percent of the deaths, while 27 percent came as a result of cardiovascular disease. Two-thirds of the people were dually diagnosed — that is, they used drugs or alcohol and also had mental-health issues.
For years, officials have been trying to figure out how to deal with the problem of homelessness in Santa Barbara County. As Dr. Takashi Wada, director of the Public Health Department, told the supervisors, the issue is “extraordinarily complex.” For example, there are large gaps in time between when most decedents last accessed services and their death. Many are resistant to treatment. Another issue is getting them correct treatment. There is an extreme lack of beds for those with drug, alcohol, or mental-health issues, and as Sheriff Bill Brown often says, the jail becomes the “de facto” mental-health facility for the mentally ill. With several consecutive years of ongoing budget cuts, it has only gotten worse.
But with the county now tracking homeless deaths, officials can begin to hone in on the most critical issues facing that population. “You now have a lot of data, and now is the time to do something with that information,” said homeless advocate Emily Allen, who, along with others, praised the report.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace




Previous Month



Comments
What they don't tell you is that many of these "homeless deaths" occurred as a direct and proximate result of cigarette smoking which is encouraged at the homeless shelters basically as (1) a cheap tranquilizer to avoid having to actually deal with issues and create a decent, respectful environment and (2) as a means to a sort of bribery economy where inmates can be manipulated with promise of a cigarette. Homelessness professionals and amateur intervenors compete for popularity among the homeless and as a result sponser rather than criticize cigarette smoking behaviours.
Another source of pathology is the failure of infectious individuals to cover their mouths properly when coughing, often issuing dense, wet clouds of pathogenic viral and bacterial vectors of disease.
Shelter staff and volunteers have an uncanny lack of concern with this, even though I have met personnel who have acquired pneumonia and other infections at these sites.
Cohorting masses of homeless people in one large room under one roof is a surefire way of ensuring that what comes around goes around. What is needed is smaller decentralized shelters and warming centers.
A major obstacle is the exaggeration of the supposed behavioural maladaptation of homeless. Eager to attract funding, various "professionals" paint a picture of homeless people as simply inept and dysfunctional people suffering from mysterious "mental illness". In many cases, however, the psychopathology of homeless persons is no better nor worse than that of the general population. The root cause of homelessness is economics: the growth of population and the contraction of homebuilding due primarily to restrictive zoning and regulatory red tape.
Thus, we have met the enemy, and it is us. Intervenors are killing with kindness the unhoused by encouraging unhealthy behaviours. Last but not least, the unrestricted provision of high fat content foods, like piles of donuts and pastries, is only more grist for the mill. The meals would be better served by a focus on spartan regiments of say rice and simple home cooked whole wheat breads, with smoking prohibited at all homeless services locations.
However, no one wants to face up to these realities, and it is far easier to blame the messenger than to consider the simple matter of health maintenance and prevention of illness. I sincerely hope that Dr. Lennon, Dr. Prystowski and the directors of Casa Esperanza (Mike Foley and Mark Asman) take these points to heart rather than defensively circling the wagons and suppressing public comment.
Geof_Bard (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2012 at 6:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Interesting points Geof, you hit on some significant factors that DO contribute to homeless deaths.
Now I'm going to throw in my $0.02 worth in there as more of a question rather than identifying factors.
How many of those homeless deaths were LOCAL homeless, not out of staters or crusties?
Seems to me that the out of state crusties you see on State Street aggressively panhandling & harassing passersby appear to be in good health.
Well fed, upright, able bodied, strong, always up for an exchange. That ain't homeless, they're HOUSELESS BY CHOICE.
I'll bet you that those homeless deaths were all to TRUE homeless that the out of state crusties stole their social service programs from.
It is the homeless lifestyle crew that IS killing the REAL homeless by stealing their deserved benefits.
Get rid of the aggressive homeless wannabe lifestylers, you can truly take care of the REAL homeless :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2012 at 11:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Revised and sent to DPH:
O: Dr Lennon
FROM: Geof Bard
CC: Prystowski, et al (DWW); Barbosa; BOS; SBCity Council;St Bridgett's
RE: Homeless deaths - Open Letter
What the report doesn't state is that many of these "homeless deaths" occurred as a direct result of cigarette smoking which is encouraged at the homeless shelters as (1) a cheap tranquilizer to avoid having to actually deal with issues and create a decent, respectful environment and (2) as a means to a bribery economy where inmates can be manipulated with promise of cigarette privileges. Homelessness intervenors compete for popularity among the homeless and as a result sponsor rather than criticize unhealthy behaviours.
Another source of "iatrogenic" pathology is the failure of infectious individuals to cover their mouths properly when coughing, often issuing dense, wet clouds of pathogenic viral and bacterial vectors of disease. Homeless shelters and warming centers are thus inevitably the cause of greater net morbidity than they prevent.
Shelter staff and volunteers have an uncanny lack of concern with this. I have met personnel who have acquired pneumonia and other infections at these sites.If anyone rocks the boat, they encounter shunning from the intervenors and subtle encouragement of thug responses from individuals who insist on their "right" to pollute the air.
Cohorting masses of homeless people in one large room under one roof is a surefire way of ensuring that what comes around goes around. What is needed is smaller decentralized shelters and warming centers.
The root cause of homelessness is economics: the growth of population and the contraction of homebuilding due primarily to restrictive zoning and regulatory red tape. Nevertheless, homelessness professionals exaggerate the incidence of morbidity in order to attract inflated funding levels. This hyperbole which is routinely practiced has the unforseen consequence of frightening citizens to the point that they become reluctant to interact with or rent to formerly homeless, thus assuring that the homelessness profession will self-perpetrate.
Thus, we have met the enemy, and it is us. Intervenors are killing with kindness the unhoused by encouraging unhealthy behaviours.
Geof_Bard (anonymous profile)
March 16, 2012 at 12:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Interesting point by Geof_Bard. I read that the one thing the Nazis allowed the inmates in the death camps to have were plentiful amounts of cigarettes.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
March 16, 2012 at 1:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I am still waiting for proof of the assertion that : "that many of these "homeless deaths" occurred as a direct result of cigarette smoking which is encouraged at the homeless shelters...". Albeit this statement makes an easy to digest anecdote to a willing reader...
I am also waiting for proof of the assertion that: "The root cause of homelessness is economic...".
The majority of homeless have mental problems AND substance abuse problems. Mental illness is not related to economic woes although conditions that accompany mental illness may be exacerbated by economic issues.
Further, I do not find the industry built around homeless particularly benevolent or universally well intentioned in all cases. Too often the industry insiders worry first and foremost about their own longevity.
While I agree that we should have more decentralized shelters when possible we have also refused to face up to the fact that a very large percentage of these folks cannot take care of themselves no matter what resources are offered. Reagan was not solely responsible for shutting down the mental institutions, the Democrats also failed to fund them which makes this a bi partisan failure in this state going back 40+ years.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
March 16, 2012 at 7:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Another issue is the REFUSAL by the mentally impaired/ill/afflicted homeless to allow any help to reach them.
The sickest thing is the fact that the law (as written to protect "civil liberties") says that help can't be forced on them.
This goes back to an Time Magazine article/interview w/ former NY Mayor Koch.
While giving a tour of NY to visiting psychologists/psychiatrists back in 1984 (I believe) to assess NYC's homeless situation they spotted something disturbing.
There was a woman, laying in the middle of Broadway in the median, passed out.
He asked what the city could do for her & the psychologists/psychiatrists told him that there was nothing that could be done, as she wasn't posing a threat to herself or others. It would also pose a violation of her "civil liberties."
Mayor Koch for a moment thought that the psychologists/psychiatrists were the crazies @ that point, but soon came to the realization that there are people, supposedly out to "do the right thing" that will keep unfortunate people such as that woman in the condition she was in.
Many of our local mentally ill homeless either refuse the help or don't have the capacity to grasp they need the help or how to get it.
MEANWHILE the crusties & BUMS take advantage of this lapse to pervert & abuse the available services while @ the same time taxing our law enforcement & emergency services for their shenanigans.
Then there's the average homeless or working homeless that are trying to get their bearings straight, but the crusties & BUMS give them a bad rap due to their behavior & actions.
It is a mess, but the fact remains, the truly homeless (w/ an emphasis on those suffering from mental illness) are who the priorities should go to :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
March 16, 2012 at 11:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It is encouraging that there are people with enough civic sense to comment here. I agree there is no hard data correlating mortality and morbidity with cigarette abuse, but anecdotally there is currently a homeless man in town with a very seriously advanced case of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease which is so bad that he probably needs to be housing in an indiviudal unit to keep his roommates from being driven nuts and kept up all night. And it is distressing to everyone, including the suffering patient, to have one of our fellow humans retching and gasping as a result of severe deterioration of bronchial tissue. It is really just horrible to contemplate. That is what the victims of Saddam Hussein endured, albeit in a more acute manner.
I watched a friend go down with emphysema. He was a tough old coot, but the couging spasms were so bad he'd black out in his apartment and come to later...and I met a Santa Barbara homeowner who has been in the hospital three times the last four months with cigarrette-induced COPD/emphysema.
And don't forget that the press covered the last Homeless Death of 2010, a man who lived in a camper and expired of advanced emphysema. Although that may not be as bad as someone shivering in a door way or under a rock or on the beach, let's face it, in one's final hour it is appropriate to be surrounded by people with some iota of compassion and concern for their fellow human. Not, alone in a cold vehicle.
Sarah House should have taken that man in. Well, don't get me started...
But it seems ludicrous for Casa Esperanza to allow smoking on its premises when there is clear and convincing scientific evidence that the smoking is creating serious pathologies which are painful and expensive to treat. We all age and die, but one can be fit and functional until their last hour and contribute to the community, or one can be a miserable crumpled basket case who is wracked with pain and misery and requires the efforts of two or three caretakers.
IMHO, there are plenty of homeless people who may or may not be quite ready to hold down a forty hour position in this economy, which has been ravaged by bureacracy from the Democrats and job exportation by the Republicans...but many homeless can and do care for themselves AND others, and don't necessarily impose impacts particularly worse than people who own and operate extravagant residential properties... we should support them, and I stand on my maimn point that the homeless service providers use cigarettes as "(1) a cheap tranquilizer to avoid having to actually deal with issues and create a decent, respectful environment and (2) as a means to a bribery economy..."
Geof_Bard (anonymous profile)
March 19, 2012 at 7 p.m. (Suggest removal)