We should all be disappointed in Rep. Lois Capps who is running a negative and misleading ad against her opponent, Abel Maldonado. The Maldonado family farming business is engaged in a dispute with the IRS that is currently in a settlement process. Capps has implied that Abel has somehow cheated on his taxes or withheld income from his tax returns, and this is seriously misleading. She should be ashamed of this dirty, negative, and inaccurate ad.
The truth is Rep. Capps has a more serious and blatant tax-reporting problem. For many years, Capps has been collecting rent in the area of tens of thousands of dollars from a staff member renting a room in her own home. This rent is income and she did not declare it. She did not report this income to the IRS until this 2012 campaign year, even though five years after the fact, she sent a letter to Congress disclosing the arrangement. This obvious and personal failure to report income is more than a normal business dispute.
This ad campaign reveals a side of Rep. Capps that is not generally known or admitted. I do know that both she and I signed the term limit pledge in our original campaign and received healthy donations and support with the organization that sponsored the term limit issue. We both pledged in writing to only serve three terms. I would have not gone back on my word, but Capps has obviously broken her pledge by many terms.
Brooks Firestone is a former member of the California State Assembly and of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors, and former candidate for Congress


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace




Previous Month



Comments
Unfortunately for the left, Brooks is factually and contextually correct.
Unfortunately for Brooks, Maldonado is a weenie which has nothing to do with the current lies that Capps is telling and irrespective of her proven tax cheating.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 14, 2012 at 10:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Maybe we should cut Ms Capps a little slack.
She is likable and well liked and seems to genuinely concerned about using tax payer dollars to help people.
Clearly the tax system makes absolutely no sense to her. But then who CAN make any sense of if.
I'm sure she has someone else do her taxes for her so she cannot be totally responsible for the accuracy of her returns.
She's had 14 years on the job AFTER retiring from a full and satisfying career as a nurse. Is it really realistic and fair to expect someone of this age and background to actually understand this stuff?
I really wonder if it's really fair or sensitive to send her back to Washington to do a job that clearly overwhelms her. Anyone who truly loves her, as do we all, should put her best interests at heart and encourage her to retire before she embarrasses herself on a major and irredeemable way.
ramey (anonymous profile)
September 14, 2012 at 2:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks to Firestone for his self righteous diatribe about tax avoidance. I'm sure all aspects of his own personal tax paying history are impeccable.
I am also absolutely sure Firestone will be placing his vote for Romney in November, a vote that will show tax avoidance only really matters when applied to the opposition.
geeber (anonymous profile)
September 15, 2012 at 12:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I never really cared much for blueblood Firestone as a representative and his mischievous political partys or even twisted ideals.
Likewise for I don't care for the little more 'independent' self promoting Maldonado for pretty much the same reasons.
Now I will vote for Capps again. I am in alignment with her voting record and consider her to be a genuine, reasonable, and nice. My skepticism causes me to be not entirely comfortable with the explanation given for the under-reported income from a typical, ordinary, accepted but corrupt under-the-table economy and income source that pervades across the American landscape. But at least Capps has made good on the lapse.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
September 15, 2012 at 7:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I saw a Lois Capps ad yesterday. She was lambasting Maldonado for "not paying his taxes while increasing yours". I don't see how she could approve that message with a straight face. The hypocrisy is no less than stunning.
Botany (anonymous profile)
September 15, 2012 at 10:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Of all the issues, this is the one Firestone is concerned about.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 15, 2012 at 10:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The writer here is desperately spinning and continues to dump his reputation.
Maldo has been informed several times he and his corporation owe more than $400 thousand in unpaid taxes. They refuse to pay, several times. Maldonado will not pay his taxes and he wants to raise the taxes of middle income Americans as he supports the tax plan by Romney. Yes he does.
Maldo also will not admit this and continues to campaign with vagaries and nonanswers, and never will admit he would be just a loyal Republican soldier if he ever is elected to Congress.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
September 15, 2012 at 11:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Too bad they can't garnish campaign donations.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 15, 2012 at 11:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If Mr. Firestone is reading this the issue of Maldonado's tax disputes were mentioned on the John and Ken show several months ago. The John and Ken show is carried on the Los Angeles station KFI 640 AM 3-7 p.m. weekdays and this is where I first heard about it.
Mrs. Capps supported the Patriot Act and the National Defense Authorization Act so whether or not she's a "nice woman" as many assert, she certainly is not protecting our freedoms. Whether Maldonado is any different, I don't know, but given his silence on these issues, I would suspect not.
Once again, it seems to come down to who can sling more mud at their opponent in an election of the lesser of two evils.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 15, 2012 at 3:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Apparently Maldonado is not any different on these issues, probably worse given it's his Party that initiated the NDAA, the "War on Drugs" "The War on Terror", The "Patriot" Act . At least Capps doesn't create the abominations she rubber stamps.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 15, 2012 at 3:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Well over a decade in office, and Lois can't run a single tv ad "about Lois." And yes the hypocricy that the old dear should get a free pass on her own tax problems is laughable. "Nothing to see here folks, just move along, Lois is genuine, Lois is nice ....."
Scooter (anonymous profile)
September 15, 2012 at 9:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Capps informed the IRS of her error when she or her people found it out; Maldonado's family agri-business has been hounded by the IRS for some time... it's quite a difference.
Firestone's blatantly one-sided letter should be amusing as well as offensive, although the Capps ad vs. Maldonado should be beneath her as a sitting member of Congress.
Deeper issues are: will Maldonado support extending the middle-class tax cut of 2003 AND letting the 2002 ginormous tax cut for the 1% expire?? What about the 8.2% unemployment? Will we fund public education? Extend Obamacare (ACA)?! Cut the Pentagon budget in half?
These are big issues before the next Congress; neither candidate wants to talk turkey about them.
Still,
Vote for Capps.
DrDan (anonymous profile)
September 17, 2012 at 6:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
KV-That is an insane defense of an un-defensable position. The supposed acumen and morality of the left should have made taking care of these abominations easy. Have you forgotten that Obama also owned the Congress and Senate for two years? For gawdsakes does anyone take responsibility for anything...
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 17, 2012 at 7:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
loonpt (anonymous profile)
September 17, 2012 at 10:34 a.m.
Bill Clausen, glad to hear you listen to John and Ken as well. They are very entertaining and get it right almost all the time. A few months ago I heard Maldonado's name and knew it sounded familiar. He stabbed the republican party in the back a few years ago when he was the swing vote on a democratic budget plan in the California Senate. He is a sell out, but like you said, lesser of two evils...
DanVac (anonymous profile)
September 18, 2012 at 2:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Does Abel Maldonado support the Patriot Act?
I don't think he's ever made any public statements about it one way or the other. No surprise since his career has been in state politics.
But I do know the Republican party that supports Maldonado has been the majority that's extended the Patriot Act three times in a row now.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
September 18, 2012 at 2:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Maldonado wants to steer way clear of the issues, because in many ways he wouldn't differ from Capps- he'd just be more vicious and explicit.
And Italiansurg completely misread my previous comment.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 18, 2012 at 3:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Some Indy commentors continually bash Lois Capps on the Patriot Act. Let's see what the facts say.
Here's the vote breakdown for the Patriot Act:
Republicans: Yeas = 211, Nays = 3
Democrats: Yeas = 145, Nays = 62
Independents: Yeas = 1, Nays = 1
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2001/roll3...
Capps voted yea, but pretty much *everyone* in Congress did. Almost a third of the Democrats opposed the act but failed. Even the Independents were not perfect.
Remember, the Patriot Act was passed a mere month after 9/11. That was a period of post-9/11 fear-mongering by the media and the Bush Administration. Many members of Congress succumbed to immense public pressure and jingoistic emotions. Others thought the good parts outweighted the bad parts. You do the calculus.
The Patriot Act is a complex set of laws, some good, some bad. Different parts are set to expire at different times. There have been at least four major votes to extend or modify the Patriot Act:
HR.514 - Extension of various Patriot Act provisions
S.2271 - Patriot Act Reauthorization bill
HR.3199 - Patriot Act Reauthorization
AMNDT.280 - Require warrant for seizing library records, etc.
How did Congresswoman Capps vote on the above? Capps voted NAY on ***EVERY*** reauthorization bill and YEA on the amendment to require warrants for seizing library records.
http://www.votesmart.org/candidate/ke...
In summary, Capps voted for the Patriot Act but has voted to let it die at every opportunity. Plus she has voted to try to repair the parts that still stand. Singling out Capps on the Patriot Act is way off track because a large majority of members of Congress (mostly Republicans) have much worse voting records on this subject.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
September 18, 2012 at 5:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)