WEATHER »

Comments by Eckermann

Page 1 of 74 | Next

Posted on May 1 at 7:56 p.m.

I don't understand all the umbrage Jarvis. The Capps ad reported exactly the sentiment that Mitchum intended (i.e., there are bigger issues in federal government than bringing home the pork to the 24th District). Personally, I vote for Senators to handle the national policy issues and I vote for House of Representative members to look after the implications of national policy on local issues. Does that mean bringing home some federal tax dollars to repair our roads and build ball parks? You bet it does. I don't speak with a forked tongue Jarvis. I'm a loud and proud liberal. I believe that the fact that government spending represents 35% or our entire economy is what keeps our economy afloat. If you asked me, I would say that Obamacare did not go far enough. Mitchum lost because most people in the 24th District are liberals. It's simple math.

On Judge Tosses Mitchum Defamation Suit Against Capps

Posted on May 1 at 5:38 p.m.

Geck's ruling gets this exactly right. The advertisement did not change the meaning of Mitchum's statement one bit. He intended to say that he was not going to go to Washington to serve the parochial interests of the people of the 24th district (e.g., ensuing as much federal tax dollars as possible get sent back here for local projects and jobs). Rather he was going to Washington to fight the battle against the liberal income redistribution schemes that have been installed in this Country since the 1930s. It turns out that the majority of voters happen to like Social Security and Medicare (and, as it turns out, Raytheon, Vandenberg Air Force Base, highway construction projects, UCSB, schools in general, and the rest of tax funded economic activity that makes up 35% of our economy). So he lost and Lois won. Great news for the conservatives is that they get another chance in 2016. I recommend that they be smarter this time an present a candidate that can get elected.

On Judge Tosses Mitchum Defamation Suit Against Capps

Posted on April 29 at 8:45 p.m.

This is at least the second construction worker that has been killed on a Chumash project. What is up with that? Are they practicing third world safety procedures in order to save money? Come on Chumash, you have more money than God. Pull it together and get your safety program in order.

On Construction Worker Dead from Fall at Chumash Casino

Posted on April 25 at 9:39 p.m.

I agree with you Nativegeo that producing in fields that have a higher gas to oil ratio makes the steaming option less expensive. However, even so, isn't the ability to make money on such projects dependent on the oil selling for somewhere in $70 - $80 per barrel range (in 2015 dollars)? It seems to me that $43/barrel is pretty far off that mark. I am open to correction if I am wrong about this. I didn't call you a liar. I just thought that you were being a little disingenuous by not acknowledging certain facts about the reality of the quality of the oil in Cat Canyon and cost and energy inputs necessary to extract it. I'm not anti-petroleum (I drive a car and play on surfboards, etc.). However, it seems to me to be weird to spend far more Btu inputs to extract the oil than it would ever pay out in Btu energy outputs as refined fuel. Making asphalt to spread on roadways is another calculus, but still the energy inputs to produce that asphalt should be considered. You are correct though that if Area wants to bet the farm on higher oil prices that is their economic affair and not mine. However, chasing an $80/barrel profit point with $43/barrel oil seems a bit silly to me.

On Oil Company Proposes 296 New Wells

Posted on April 24 at 9:44 p.m.

Nativegeo, you have not contradicted or presented any facts to counter anything that I have posted on this string. I agree with you (as I must because those are the facts) that there is a great deal of residual oil left in Cat Canyon. However, the quality of that oil is poor (far less than 20 gravity), the emulsion is mostly water (in some cases exceeding 90%), and it costs a lot of energy and money to extract it. I am not making a judgment as to whether or not we should extract it. I am just musing as to whether or not it is worth it in terms of safety and economics. I wish I could live up to your label "greenie," but, alas, I spend much to much time on the deck of plank of polyurethane foam that is encased in fiberglass and resin to be able to get up on the "greenie' high horse. I just calls 'em like I sees 'em.

On Oil Company Proposes 296 New Wells

Posted on April 24 at 7:51 p.m.

Come on Nativegeo, you know better than that if you were around in the 70s and 80s. Steam enhancement only became cost effective after the Arab oil embargo increased the price of crude. Some of the early steaming projects actually used the produced crude as fuel for the steam generators. Some fields produced enough gas to use that as fuel (often high sulfur gas as that). When the price of natural gas dropped it made the practice even more profitable because environmental regulations were cheaper to comply with. All the time the price of crude continued to increase (with some dips and jumps here and there), which made steaming even more profitable. Now that oil is back down to around $50/barrel (and who knows what that Cat Canyon goo is worth per barrel ($7? $10? even as much as $20?), steaming just does not make sense unless the product is specialized (like asphalt) or Saudi Arabia blinks and cuts production and the price goes back up. I am not offended by your bias Nativegeo, but I am rather put off when you are not honest.

On Oil Company Proposes 296 New Wells

Posted on April 24 at 4:25 p.m.

Cyclic steaming is a little safer than steam flooding (it was also called steam drive in the past) because with cyclic steaming you actually put steam down the well you want to produce and then after letting it "soak" you produce that well. If there are problems you can simply shut off that well until you figure out the problems. With steam flood you designate certain wells which you use to inject steam in order to "flood" the field with heat in the hopes that the heat will transfer somewhat uniformly throughout the field to reduce viscosity of the goo and enhance production. The problem with steam flood is that it almost never affects all the production wells uniformly and when you encounter problems it is more difficult to pinpoint the cause. Finally, steaming is very energy intensive and expensive. Aera is either betting that the price of oil is going to climb back to $100/barrel range or they have found a market for very expensive asphalt for some future road construction project. Otherwise, I don't see how this pencils out economically.

On Oil Company Proposes 296 New Wells

Posted on April 9 at 8:47 p.m.

For ten years I commuted to and from work on my bicycle. Not being concerned with speed (the commute was only a couple of miles) and not being part of the spandex hoard (which annoyed the hell out me), I scrupulously followed all the rules of the road. Regardless of my scruples, I was nearly hit by cars (nearly killed?) many times. For a while, I took an alternative route that was two miles out of my way just to ensure that I made only right turns. It is dangerous out there for bikes. Becker thinks that the streets belong to cars and maybe he is right. The cars act like that in any case. Now I drive a car everywhere. My old mountain bike sits dusty in my garage with flat tires. But I always give bikes on the road a wide berth and let them streak in front of me ignoring stop signs, just for old times' sake. I think the solution to this whole problem is for both bicyclists and auto drivers to not be in a hurry to get anywhere. Slow down, be late to that appointment, enjoy life at a leisurely pace. This might sound like a contradiction, but life is too short to spend it in a hurry.

On Car Chasing the Dog

Posted on April 9 at 3:20 p.m.

Why the heck would we spend $120 million in construction and $18 million every year in operations costs for a jail that we do not need? Has Brown been smoking the weed that the Sherriff's Department has been confiscating? He doesn't even have a plan to raise the revenue for the $18 million a year operations costs. He just wants the Supervisors to give it to him as if he were a teenager looking for a raise in his allowance. When both the North County Supervisors are expressing skepticism about the need for a new jail, you know the project is on the ropes. All we need now is strong body shot and then a decent knock-out blow to the jaw, followed by a slow count to ten.

On Sheriff Misfires in Budget Shootout

Posted on April 7 at 9:26 p.m.

John Tieber, from reading many of your posts, I have come the conclusion that your circle of concern and your circle of influence do not touch on very many points. Your life must be stressful.

On Clinic May Have Infected Patients with Hepatitis, HIV

Page 1 of 74 | Next

event calendar sponsored by: