WEATHER »

Comments by Kratatoa

Previous | Page 2 of 42 | Next

Posted on January 3 at 2:07 p.m.

I'm talking about the fact that the victim's DNA was found on Frinpong's genitalia. That is never mentioned in the article.

Why would you admonish me to read the entire article when you didn't read enough to understand my point? Is this some kind of deliberately stupid performance art or something?

On Frimpong Case: Eric on Trial

Posted on January 3 at 2:01 p.m.

Herschel, was your memo meant to be ironic? Nowhere in that quote does it reveal that the victim's DNA was found on Frimpong's genitalia.

On Exonerating Eric Frimpong

Posted on January 2 at 11:26 p.m.

newtrial, the fact that the victim's DNA was found on Frimpong's genitals is only being discussed because I pointed out it was not covered in the article.

On Exonerating Eric Frimpong

Posted on January 2 at 11:23 p.m.

Exactly. The DNA evidence was the key. This whole article builds things up, point by detailed point ... and then dodges what for many people was the most important fact in the case.

On Frimpong Case: Eric on Trial

Posted on January 1 at 10:04 p.m.

The fact that this "exoneration" of Frimpong is afraid to tell us that the victim's DNA was found on his genitals speaks volumes.

On Exonerating Eric Frimpong

Posted on January 1 at 9:45 p.m.

Neglecting to mention that the victim's DNA was found on Frimpong's genitals destroyed the credibility of this article.

On Frimpong Case: Eric on Trial

Posted on December 31 at 2:14 p.m.

Once again, why did the author of this article avoid mentioning that the victim's DNA was found on Frimpong's genitalia? And if the author was willing to hide this from us, what else has been omitted from this article?

On Frimpong Case: Eric on Trial

Posted on December 31 at 11:27 a.m.

Nowhere in that quote does in mention that the victim's DNA was found on Frimpong's genitalia.

On Frimpong Case: Eric on Trial

Posted on December 31 at 1:06 a.m.

So why didn't this comprehensive review of the evidence mention that the victim's DNA was found on Frimpong's genitals?

http://www.keyt.com/news/local/124928...

On Frimpong Case: Eric on Trial

Posted on December 25 at 2:31 a.m.

Does this mean that SBCAG is taking back the $1.5 million "loaned" from the widening project to CalTrans for the suicide barrier?

On 101 Widening Takes Precedence

Previous | Page 2 of 42 | Next

event calendar sponsored by: