A few months ago someone wrote an on-target letter to The Santa Barbara Independent about the strange soft porn in American Apparel’s advertising. It was a throw down after week upon week of weird voyeuristic presentations. I applauded and exhaled in relief at the sudden absence of AA’s ad campaign in these pages. Slowly, stealthily, they’ve returned — and while the current full-page spread features a model fully clad in a turtleneck, the accompanying text offends, degrades, and distracts.

Admittedly, I ran into a few Playboy centerfolds as a kid in the 1970s, and this script reminds me of those self-penned descriptions: “her favorite food is avocado but her nickname is ‘Brownie'” and when not studying “she’s usually watching horror movies in bed.” TMI [too much information], as my kids say . I can’t even see what exactly she’s wearing, so once again American Apparel is selling suggestive allure, not cotton clothing, with that amateur photo ambience like it was shot in someone’s basement.

I can’t stand that we’re expected to play along that American Apparel is so organic and American and sweat-shop free — with this most entry-level objectification in our faces every week. Sure, it’s everywhere in fashion media, but not everywhere in The Independent. I loved feeling part of a pioneering rejection when you stopped running their ad campaign. Can you revert back to holding that line for our community?


Please note this login is to submit events or press releases. Use this page here to login for your Independent subscription

Not a member? Sign up here.