• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

Ray Ford

Ron Noe climbs up a steep section of burn area that could have serious erosion issues this winter.


Officials Survey Fire Damage, Plan for Risks

Forum Held to Identify Risks, Show Current Mitigation Efforts


Friday, September 12, 2008
By Ben Preston (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

In the wake of the Gap Fire, county, state, and federal officials have been assessing damage and have attempted to discern what risks exist this winter when the rains finally do come. Heads of the various agencies involved in the cleanup effort — Santa Barbara County Fire, the Forest Service, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the National Weather Service (NWS), the City of Goleta, and others — held a forum Thursday night to present the information that has been gathered so far and to answer questions posed by members of the public. Of the 150 or so people who showed up, a show of hands revealed that roughly half had been affected by evacuations during the Gap Fire.

Small gullies and scorched hillsides like this above Goleta could cause massive erosion this winter.
Click to enlarge photo

Ray Ford

Small gullies and scorched hillsides like this above Goleta could cause massive erosion this winter.

County Emergency Operations Chief Michael Harris said that the community has learned lessons from the Gap Fire — including how to better prepare for the next one and protecting property with flood insurance. “We’re not here to scare you to death, we’re here to paint an honest picture,” he said, noting that the fire caused numerous watershed impacts which are currently being mitigated. Steve Wagner, Goleta’s Director of Community Services, said that every watershed tributary in Goleta has some burned area in it, making an anticipatory response to flooding and mudslides necessary. “We’re hoping for the best, but we’re planning for the worst,” he said.

Helicopter sprays hydromulch on the hillsides to minimize erosion during the winter rains.
Click to enlarge photo

Helicopter sprays hydromulch on the hillsides to minimize erosion during the winter rains.

Over the past few months, work has been underway to clear creeks and streams and prepare for the coming rains. Burned areas have been closed to keep road vehicles off of them, which officials said would disrupt the fragile layer of topsoil. Beginning September 24, aerial mulching — spraying a chemical soil binder to strengthen the top layer of soil — of about 1,500 acres will commence. Bob Hawkins of the U.S. Forest Service said that debris barriers — metal racks that collect material and can be cleaned out periodically — will also be utilized. Providing $3.8 million, the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) has been working with landowners in the burned areas implement these measures. Since NRCS —which has coordinated eight damage survey reports with the county and the Goleta Water District — is a nonregulatory agency, participation by landowners has been voluntary. Jeff Raifschneider of NRCS reported a 71 percent participation rate in their Emergency Watershed Protection program.

Mountainsides in the San Pedro drainage like this pose a serious risk to the valley because of the steepness of the slopes.
Click to enlarge photo

Ray Ford

Mountainsides in the San Pedro drainage like this pose a serious risk to the valley because of the steepness of the slopes.

Since most people in Santa Barbara County are in preferred risk flood areas, many people do not have flood insurance. FEMA’s Regional Flood Insurance Specialist, Jana Critchfield, encouraged homeowners to get flood insurance, urging them to start looking now, as it can take a while to get a response from insurance companies. She said assistance could be garnered from FEMA if there is flood damage to a home that doesn’t have flood insurance, but that only $28,000 per address is available, with a presidential declaration of a national disaster necessary to activate the funds. Furthermore, she explained that once the funding is used, it is no longer available to that address, regardless of owner. Aside from noting potential risks, Critchfield lauded Santa Barbara as a community for the work that has been done so far to prevent disaster from happening. “You are so prepared, you could really be models for other communities in the United States. You’re to be commended. You make out jobs easier.”

Looking across a number of smaller drainages in the upper end of what is the Los Carneros Creek watershed illustrates the difficulty of trying to stem the debris flow in each of them.
Click to enlarge photo

Ray Ford

Looking across a number of smaller drainages in the upper end of what is the Los Carneros Creek watershed illustrates the difficulty of trying to stem the debris flow in each of them.

Eric Boldt, the flash flood program coordinator for the National Weather Service (NWS), warned of the urgency of flash floods, the risk of which is very high in the lowlands beneath mountains so recently denuded by fire. “Flash flooding is one of the most dangerous things to deal with,” he said. “When you hear the warning … you need to take shelter.” NWS is coordinating with TV and radio stations to set up the following tiered warning system:

Advisory: Deals with nuisance level rains and minor flooding.

Outlook: A special weather statement indicating flood-causing weather is likely.

Watch: Weather that is likely to cause flash flooding is six to 12 hours away. Preparations should be made.

Warning: A flash flood is five to 45 minutes away. Take shelter immediately.

“Debris flows are tricky whether they’re going to be two or ten feet deep, so we need to stay on the side of caution,” said Boldt. “In California, we get pretty relaxed about the weather. This winter, I want you to think like a Midwesterner.”

The mitigation work is now 50 percent done and will be completed before the first rain, said Tom Fayram of County Public Works Flood Control District. “We will get runoff from the first storm and every storm, so our challenge is to prepare for that.” Sand bags will be available from the county at no cost at Fire Station 14, which is located at 320 Los Carneros Rd. The American Red Cross has disaster relief supplies and kits available as well. Other precautionary measures include Goleta’s new alert system, which sends email and text messages to residents and businesses. To receive a Goleta City Alert, sign up at the city Web site, goleta.govoffice.com.

Related Links

  • The City of Goleta website
  • Floodsmart.gov
  • Los Padres National Forest
Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

Well-
The Gap Community meeting was interesting to hear the heroic efforts of the LOCAL county fire, Emergency Opps, Sherrif, during the fire that we all watched so closely. It was a memorable 4th of July wasnt it ?
I still cant believe that the County and NRCS is waiting another 60 days from now( why wait until November 10Th?)- since it has already been 60 days before they plan on doing any erosion control.
They took the "easy" and much more expensive Forest Service placebo of spraying green dye mulch and a 3 month soil stabilizer.
Several Erosion Control professionals suggested they could begin work next week- for 2/3 the cost of the Aerial application and have 90% of the private land treated by November 1st, using much better erosion protection than what the USFS is using. The County and NRCS should know better.
Tough to see the taxpayers dollars squandered by not using the best technology for a lesser cost.
Shame on the NRCS and Flood control for not orchestrating their own efforts. I know many ranchers and landowners who have done their own thing...
Best of luck to all..
Proactive, timeley Erosion prevention cost less than 1/10th the cost of sediment control and cleanup.
Seeing how USFS bigwigs has treated the county in this firethus far is a good indication that it is "every man" for himself.

GoletaBoy (anonymous profile)
September 12, 2008 at 3:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)

A major concern regarding the hydromulching is the tackifier they have decided to use. The forrest service will be using a product that is very ineffective. The guar-gum based tickifier will not hold up to the rains that will come. Unfortunatley, the County of Santa Barbara might follow the lead of the forrest service and apply the same thing. From what I read, guar-gum based tackifiers are only about 78% effective after only 2 inches of rain. I know there are other products out there and available that can be mixed with the hydromulch such as a product called EarthGuard, that can make the application far superior. From a study I’ve read, EarthGuard is 99.5% effective.
The forrest service and SB County are spending nearly 10 million dollars for the aerial hydro-mulch. In my opinion, they are wasting their money, endangering lives and the environment by using only a Guar-gum tackifier. These agencies are not doing their due dilligence in finding out what kind of erosion control products are best for this situation. Hopefully they will reaccess what they are going to spray on the burned hillsides and use something that is actually going to work.

betofoster (anonymous profile)
September 12, 2008 at 3:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)

So, were either of you or your information sources present at this meeting or have contacted the County, NRCS, or Forest Service to provide this information?

If there are better, cheaper ways to protect the homes & people under potential threat, I'd like to think those alternatives have a chance to be considered by the responsible government agencies.

IKnowSomeThings (anonymous profile)
September 12, 2008 at 7:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Yes- I was present at the meeting.
Yes- I have alerted USFS/ SB Flood Control / NRCS
that they are paying too much and getting too little protection.
The worst part is that the SB private landowners and the County will have to wait another 6 weeks for any soil stabilization to begin.
Specific numbers were shared with these entities about what savings and better protection was available.
I even extended an offer to donate all my time and efforts to conduct a side-by-side evaluation of their proposed treatment with the various other products they could get for their money.
I seriously doubt any change will come- but the authorities in charge will not even acknowledge they have looked at these other options.
Yeah-me too- I would like to have thought that collective intelligence would be able to be re-examined, especially in this highly exposed, potentially dangerous situation and in these tough budget times.

GB

GoletaBoy (anonymous profile)
September 14, 2008 at 7:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Clear Sky
Temperature:
63.0°
Wind:
14 WSW

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Wedding Guide 2009
  • SBIFF 2009
  • Local Heroes 2008
  • Best Of 2008
  • Tea Fire 2008
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Summer Reading
  • Santa Barbara Reads 2009 Chooses Fahrenheit 451
  • East Beach Water Contamination Mystery Continues
  • El Corazón del Perro
  • The Stone Foxes Return to Rock’s Roots
  • Horseback Riding Helps Local Vets
  1. Cottage, Sansum May Fuse
  2. Pacific Capital Bancorp Refutes Takeover Gossip
  3. Santa Barbara Named One of “Ten Pricey Cities That Pay Off”
  4. Santa Barbara Scrapbooks to Close Its Doors
  5. Official Michael Jackson Party Announced
  6. Deceased Man Found in Car on Coast Village Road
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.