The Veterans for Peace anti-war demonstrations, built seaside the first Sunday of every month, may have faded a bit in recent years, but the display is still going strong.
In response to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, war veterans, activists, and volunteers constructed 340 wooden crosses — representing American soldiers killed in the conflict — and dug them into West Beach sand in November 2003. Because of the public’s immediate positive reception, Veterans for Peace began repeating the protest on a weekly basis.
Then, after one mother wrote her deceased son’s name on a cross, their number expanded to 3,000, half of them displaying the names of troops killed in Iraq. In August 2010, Arlington West shifted its focus to U.S. deaths in Afghanistan and added a small representation of the Vietnam Memorial in Washington, D.C.
The display last Sunday, February 5, morphed once again to keep up with current conflicts. It featured an arrangement of around 1,500 black and white crosses, caskets covered by American flags, flowers, and a large sign reading, “Don’t Attack Iran! End US Occupation of Iraq/Afghanistan Now!” The miniature Vietnam Memorial was also present.
The volunteers present at the demonstration on Super Bowl Sunday said they thought they were connecting with the people they interacted with, saying that about 70 percent of these people agreed that there would be a war with Iran. “We’re all veterans. No matter what they say, we think there’ll be some bloodshed,” commented Thomas Scheff, a Korean War veteran and professor of sociology at UCSB.
After observing passing groups of people for over three hours, Scheff said that many walk right by their arrangement of crosses and memorial displays but appear to ignore them. “What’s really interesting is that a lot of people don’t want to know,” he said. “They don’t even look. A lot of people say, ‘What war?’ I say, ‘Afghanistan.’ When I say what the cost of the war is, they look at me and understand. Women cry.”
Despite the ignorance of some, the veterans feel that their efforts are worth it because of the people that do hear them out. “This is one way we hope to get to the whole country,” said Ron Dexter, a Korean War veteran and longtime Arlington West volunteer. “The message might get out there and remind people, ‘Wait a minute. What is this about?’ And maybe they won’t fall into this stampede because one of our ships gets attacked or someone says something bad about us.”
Demonstration volunteers said they feel a war with Iran is likely. “How are things in Iran now? They’re in turmoil,” said Dexter. “The sanctions that we’ve applied to Iran have hurt the people — just like we did to Iraq. The Iranians are unhappy with Americans for very good reasons. We’re putting sanctions on them and telling them they can’t produce anything nuclear.”



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace







Previous Month



Comments
There will be no war with Iran (under Obama). Panetta has said no, Obama has said no, Sarkosy has said no, Turkey has said no. Bob Gates, a Republican, said he never wants to see another war in the ME again.
Here is a video of Panetta explaining why:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=...
tabatha (anonymous profile)
February 12, 2012 at 8:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
That is correct. There will be no war by the United States against Iran. Not with Obama in the White House. However, Israel will go to war with Iran and knock out there nuclear capabilites before the November election. The world will publicly condemn them, including the United States. But our hypocrisy knows no bounds, because in private we will all be thanking God that Israel had the balls to do it!
rukidding (anonymous profile)
February 12, 2012 at 10:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
(Reuters) - President Barack Obama said on Sunday that Israel has not yet decided how to respond to concerns about Iran's nuclear program and said there was no evidence that Iran has the "intentions or capabilities" to wage attacks on U.S. soil.
Asked in an NBC interview whether Israel was set to attack Iran, Obama said: "I don't think that Israel has made a decision on what they need to do. I think they, like us, believe that Iran has to stand down on its nuclear weapons program," adding Israel and the United States would work "in lockstep" on Iran.
The Democrat made clear on Sunday that he would not like to see more fighting in the oil-producing Persian Gulf region.
"Any kind of additional military activity inside the Gulf is disruptive and has a big effect on us. It could have a big effect on oil prices, we've still got troops in Afghanistan, which borders Iran, and so our preferred solution here is diplomatic," he said.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/0...
tabatha (anonymous profile)
February 12, 2012 at 11:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I wouldn't be to sure about Obama getting us involved in a war with Iran. He serves the same masters as all of our past leaders. They all speak with forked tongue when it comes to war.
ramoncramon (anonymous profile)
February 12, 2012 at 12:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@ rukidding:
"we will all be thanking God that Israel had the balls to do it!"
r ***U*** kidding?!?!?
Bottomest line is, the nuclear genie bin out of the bottle, long time.
Based on Israel's unmitigated perfidy toward USA, we should dump Israel ASAP. Cast off your brainwashed inhibitions, groveling goyim! SPEAK OUT! American politicians kowtow profusely to the Israel lobby precisely BECAUSE Americans are such mewling cowards.
Aw, never mind.....................
Adonis_Tate (anonymous profile)
February 12, 2012 at 5:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Clinton wanted to bomb Iran. The Pentagon said no. All the war games they have run (as mentioned in the video above) show that the US would lose.
If the "masters of all our past leaders" have always gotten their way, it would have happened under Bush. He had 8 years to do it. It never happened.
tabatha (anonymous profile)
February 12, 2012 at 6:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It's interesting so many U.S. Republican politicians kowtow to the Pro Israel Lobby and let AIPAC and Netanyahu's Likud government walk all over ours. I suppose it's because the conservative Christian wing of their constituents think Israel can do no wrong. But so much of the Jewish-American vote goes to Democrats. How ironic.
At any rate, Netanyahu will do what's in his own best interests, not necessarily ours. Their media blitz for hearts and minds(if not wallets) is already on.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
February 12, 2012 at 6:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Has nothing to do with "Israel doing no wrong" - has everything to do with Israel's right to exist. So yeah, very ironic.
Scooter (anonymous profile)
February 13, 2012 at 10:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why should the U.S. go to war with Iran? The war-complex has plenty of countries to attack with "stan" at the end of their names. We're in Afghanistan, alienating Pakistan, and who know which country is next.
I'm not saying the U.S. won't eventually get around to Iran, but there are plenty of other Bogeymen to fight in the interim.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
February 21, 2012 at 2:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The pressure from Israel and the Republican hawks is definitely on:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/04/wor...
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
March 3, 2012 at 9:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)