The empty supermarket at Chapala and Victoria will be an ideal shelter for the Santa Barbara downtown homeless. With donations from businesses, wealthy families, churches, foundations, possibly a voluntary sales tax, a non-profit organization could buy the property.
Many necessary articles such as mattresses, blankets, pillows, sheets, furniture, plants, benches, books, brooms, mops, arts and crafts materials, TVs, etc. can be obtained through donations.
There would be supervision at all times. It would necessitate a staff of four to cover the 168 hours of each week. That means a staff cost of about $150,000 per annum. Maintenance and cleaning materials should not be more than $50,000 per annum. The residents would be requested to help keep the shelter clean.
The parking lot would be converted into a garden with wide low benches for those not comfortable sleeping inside as yet. An awning would cover the outdoor sleeping area. The awning would have flaps that could come down if needed.
Indoors there would be an extensive sleeping area with as many mattresses as reasonably comfortable and humane. There would be a men’s and a women’s bathroom as well as kitchen with pots and pans, plates and silverware. A TV room with a library area and an arts and crafts section would make for a reasonable living experience.
The location is ideal for the many homeless people who have been living on the street in downtown Santa Barbara. It will be an excellent use for a, seemingly, abandoned building and lot.
The amount of money to purchase the property, make necessary renovations, and annual costs would be relatively low to stop human suffering and give the many people who would like to help the opportunity to donate money, articles, etc. in order to stop this barbaric homeless situation. What great nation or city abandons elderly people to sleep in the street and eat out of the garbage? At least in Santa Barbara we can demonstrate how humanity can be sincerely human.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
It's a nice thought. There are two huge hurdles to overcome. The first of course is the money. The second would be to get the neighbors to sign on. Nimby's rule in this town as evidence by the vote in measure Y.
Botany (anonymous profile)
June 18, 2012 at 7:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Great idea! Santa Barbara could give a fine example. This building/area has been abandoned for so long.
mcheca (Miguel Checa)
June 18, 2012 at 8:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Last I heard, there's a mixed-use condo project planned for that property:
http://www.independent.com/news/2010/...
"The project, which sits adjacent to the historic Arlington Theatre, will consist of 37 residential condos, a market, and commercial retail space, altogether occupying about 100,000 square feet of space."
Regardless, I'm sure Casa Esperenza would be grateful to accept donations:
http://casa-esperanza.org/cm/Donate.html
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
June 18, 2012 at 9:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Unless that project has fallen victim to the economic malaise, the old Vons is supposed to be razed and the property turned into a platinum LEED rated building to include a gourmet food market similar to the covered markets of Italy or Spain, where a number of food shops are housed under one roof. It is to be called Santa Barbara Market, and the owner/developer is a woman from San Francisco. The project also includes condos and a demonstration kitchen/dining room that can be rented out for special events and classes.
blackpoodles (anonymous profile)
June 18, 2012 at 10:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Another spectacularly bad idea. A huge amount of public money just to shorten the commute of the homeless to the main downtown area? Give me a break!
ramey (anonymous profile)
June 19, 2012 at 9:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Make it a skatepark.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
June 19, 2012 at 10:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The idea is good,but it`s WAY too close to dwntwn. I wrote almost the same proposal a few years ago, suggesting the airport area [where the old hangars are] ,but could`nt even get it under the Mayor`s door!...I don`t understand why current disfunctional programs are being used,when clearly,the citizens have a logical & working grasp of the situation & can suggest positive,working changes..
PeterPeli (anonymous profile)
June 19, 2012 at 11:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yes, yes, and we could light it with rainbows and heat it with unicorn farts!!
Let's all pitch in. Maybe we can build a stage and put on a show for our homeless guests too!!
zappa (anonymous profile)
June 19, 2012 at 2:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Now you're talking Zappa. I'm assuming you'll be part of the orchestra, I will of course direct, Hank can write the script, and Don McD can make the costumes.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
June 19, 2012 at 3:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Santa Barbara priced itself out of the range of working-class people. That's the source of the problem.
When the area is run like a community and not a country club then the cause of the problem will be addressed.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
June 19, 2012 at 3:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree 100% Bill, they've turned the town into a sorta DisneyLand. Next they'll be charging entry fees.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
June 19, 2012 at 3:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Don 't give them any ideas Ken.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
June 20, 2012 at 2:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Three issues really. Consistent funding year in and year out. The neighbors. Yes, we can cry NIMBY, but would you like a homeless shelter next to your home? Third, zoning. It's commercial, not residential. Your estimates for salaries for supervision are WAY too low. Based on 8,736 hours, you would have two people making $10 hr. for a straight salary cost of $174,720. That's under minimum wage, no benefits and no supervisor. At that wage, you wouldn't get anyone qualified to operate a shelter come come. Oh, and insurance cost. Not trying to be a kill joy. The concept is honorable, but there is a lot that goes into something like this.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
June 20, 2012 at 1:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
With all due respect, this is one of the worst ideas I have ever heard. Santa Barbara has become a destination city for the homeless. We have more than enough shelters and services for the homeless that seek help. You will never end homelessness for the segment that chooses not to work and won't make any effort to better their condition. There will always be those who would rather let you find ways to feed and shelter them. I have been in SB since 1968 and have to say that the homeless have nearly ruined this city with their urinating, defecating, litter and filth all over the sidewalks and in the bushes. Wake up you bleeding hearts, the reasons that people are homeless are so complex and will not be fixed by building yet another shelter.
goodprevails (anonymous profile)
June 25, 2012 at 11:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)