In its second decision against the Santa Barbara News-Press in a year, the National Labor Relations Board on Thursday affirmed a judge’s finding that the paper was bargaining in bad faith. The newsroom union has been in fruitless contract negotiations with management since 2007.
There was no immediate response from the paper, but it is expected that owner Wendy McCaw will appeal to a federal court, as she did in August 2011, when the NLRB ordered her to reinstate eight reporters illegally fired for protected union activities. The case is being closely watched in the newspaper industry due to possible effects on labor relations.
Thursday’s decision, affirming a May 2010 determination by Administrative Law Judge Clifford Anderson, also ordered the reinstatement of columnist Richard Mineards, now a columnist for the Montecito Journal, along with back pay and benefits since 2009. The paper was also ordered to reinstate employee Dennis Moran, member of the bargaining committee, who was terminated by newsroom manager Scott Steepleton on what Ira Gottlieb, Teamsters’ attorney representing the newsroom, called “trumped-up charges.”
In Thursday’s decision, the NLRB also found that the newspaper violated federal labor law on a number of other counts, including encouraging employees to not cooperate with NLRB investigations.
The NLRB also said that the paper’s bad faith bargaining was “aggravated,” and its proposals “so extreme that they would leave employees and the union with fewer rights and protections than they would have without any contract at all.”
In its 2011 ruling ordering reinstatement of eight reporters, the NLRB also found that the paper engaged in illegal surveillance of union activity, gave lower evaluations to employees because of their support for the union, and canceled Starshine Roshell’s column for discriminatory reasons. Roshell is now a columnist for The Santa Barbara Independent, along with this writer, a News-Press columnist until 2007.
In commenting after last year’s ruling, News-Press attorney Michael Zinser said he expected the paper to be vindicated at the federal court level due to “improper motivation” by the fired journalists who, he said, “wanted to take over the content of the paper.”
Oral arguments will begin November 8 in federal court on the News-Press appeal from the 2011 ruling on the eight reporters, according to Gottlieb. A decision is expected late next year or early 2014, he told The Independent.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Scott Steepleton trumped up something?
Shocking.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
September 28, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)
McCaw's refusal to obey the rules shows what renegade, robber baron capitalism is about, and that it's back. Just look at Mitt's plans to continue lowering taxes for the 1% and dumping on the the 47%. Pay up, McCaw. Better yet, sell your newspaper since we need a good daily in this town.
DrDan (anonymous profile)
September 28, 2012 at 1:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
McCaw should just cut her losses and say 'Uncle' to the NLRB before she get's even more ridiculed and has to say 'Uncle' in Federal district court.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
September 28, 2012 at 2:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I feel sorry for all of the quality people that work or used to work at the NP that Steepleton, Kadich and McCaw have hurt. The Santa Barbara community deserves so much better than what they get from the NP. It's too bad that people continue to buy, read, advertise in or line their birdcages with this paper. McCaw should sell the NP - it's the only way to restore this once-proud paper to it's former glory.
goodprevails (anonymous profile)
September 29, 2012 at 9:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
By the time the court rules on the appeal, I'm afraid that the NP will no longer be a viable business.
banjo (anonymous profile)
September 29, 2012 at 3:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
that's her plan: when NP goes into receivership there'll be no assets to sell to pay off those she illegally fired so long ago.
DrDan (anonymous profile)
September 29, 2012 at 4:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I seriously doubt her long-term goal is to go out of business!
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 29, 2012 at 4:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What a farce - the warped billionairess and her lackey Scotty.
Too sad - it would be nice if someone who knows what balanced journalism is owned the paper.
mangomamma (anonymous profile)
September 29, 2012 at 6:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Does anyone know whether McCaw has finally paid Jerry Roberts the monies she was ordered to pay - I believe it was almost $1million and represented his legal fees and expenses in the arbitration. The abitrator's decision awarding those fees was upheld by several different courts, but I have yet to hear whether the publishing company finally paid up.
Justice (anonymous profile)
September 30, 2012 at 8:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Her long term plan is probably to move the NP newsroom to Goleta, print in Goleta, and develop the land downtown.
Tigershark (anonymous profile)
September 30, 2012 at 1:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
That'd be kind of cool.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 30, 2012 at 3:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@Tigershark: I'm sure that would happen as some of the interior of the News-Press building might by considered a historical landmark.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 30, 2012 at 11:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Prediction: There will be three lanes from Ventura to Gaviota before this is resolved.
pazala (anonymous profile)
October 1, 2012 at 10:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)