Michael Feeney presents the Hot Springs Canyon issue to the Montecito Water District board In February 2012.
Paul Wellman

As expected, the Land Trust for Santa Barbara County announced this week that it had closed the deal to buy the McCaslin family’s extensive Hot Springs Canyon property, a publicly beloved 462-acre hunk of front-country foothills in Montecito. The long-stewing preservation play got done for $7.6 million — nearly $1 million less than the previously agreed upon purchase price — but what exactly comes next for the property and the various claims to the associated water rights remains very much up in air.

The Land Trust has always maintained that it does not intend to become the long-term owner of the land, and that was reiterated this week by its executive director, Michael Feeney. “Basically, the Land Trust decided to jump in the pool and buy the project, and, while our goal is still to convey all or most [of the land] to the Forest Service, there are still some very complex and tricky issues that we need to work out,” said Feeney. “We are definitely taking a risk.”

The issues that remain revolve around existing water rights on the Hot Springs property. As a matter of policy, the U.S. Forest Service does not like to take over properties that have preexisting ownership claims of any kind, preferring instead to own what they own outright. The Hot Springs problem is two-fold. First, there is a 16-year-old agreement between the Montecito Water District and the McCaslins that gives the district the groundwater rights for the property. The water, which is some 300 feet beneath the ground and best accessed by one district-built well on the lower portion of the property, has never actually been extracted by the district but is an insurance policy to protect against droughts.

The second issue involves the property’s artesian spring water. Per an agreement that dates back to 1897, a little known entity called the Montecito Creek Water Company has exclusive access to the fabled spring water, which is captured and piped out as cheap irrigation water for 38 neighborhood homes. The old document says that 50 percent of the spring water should go to the company with the remaining half belonging to the property owner. But an informal agreement between the company and the McCaslins allowed the company to capture 100 percent of the spring water, which has rendered the canyon’s namesake hot springs all but extinct; that agreement also allows the owners to reclaim their 50 percent when they please.

The Montecito District Water board (shown here meeting in February 2012) holds all the marbles for the future of the Hot Springs Canyon ownership.
Paul Wellman

Working out these two claims has made the Land Trust’s usual purchase-and-transfer formula a bit more complicated, but Feeney said that his organization had to act, even though all parties involved are not yet settled on the resolution. “The seller wasn’t going to just sit around and wait for us forever,” he said. “They already extended escrow twice and dropped the sale price by $900,000.”

Feeney believes that the groundwater issue is the more pressing and difficult compromise to broker, but that the solution will likely come in one of two ways, with the overwhelming bulk of the property still going to the Forest Service as planned: Either the Land Trust will grant an easement to the Montecito Water District to access the 40-acre piece of property that features the existing well if and when they need to tap into the flow, or those 40 acres will actually be transferred to the district so that its water rights will remain. Those solutions, however, mean that the district would give up its claims to the rest of the property, which today could theoretically be subject to more wells as per the 16-year-old agreement.

As such, any deal requires the support of the Montecito Water District’s Board of Directors, which is on record for being in support of preservation but also committed to protecting the district’s best interests. “This stuff is extremely complicated, probably the most complicated deal we have worked on, and the negotiations remain ongoing,” said Feeney.

Postcard view of Hot Springs Canyon Lodge from decades ago.

As for the spring water, Feeney doesn’t think that the Forest Service will take too much issue with the 50 percent claim, at least based on prior conversations. In the meantime, with the Land Trust now technically the owners of record, Feeney said there are no current plans to release the portion of the water that it owns back into the creek and rejuvenate the springs. “We have not made that decision yet,” he said. “As I said, our goal is still to convey to the Forest Service.”

Calls to the Forest Service were not immediately returned this week.

The Montecito Water District’s Board of Directors next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, March 20, and the Hot Springs discussion is on the agenda.


Please note this login is to submit events or press releases. Use this page here to login for your Independent subscription

Not a member? Sign up here.