Dale Lowdermilk

In Santa Barbara, there is a “safety corridor” sign as you start up Highway 154 toward Lake Cachuma. It says “safety corridor … no drinking and driving.” Does that mean it’s sort-of-okay to drink and drive if you’re not in a safety corridor? Why not include “don’t smoke pot or eat saturated fats while in safety corridor”?

How much does it cost taxpayers to have a “$1000 Fine for Littering” sign posted every five miles? How many people (if any) have actually been prosecuted/fined $1000 for littering? Perhaps if California offered a $10,000 reward for info/video of anyone caught littering there would be enthusiastic public participation and measurable results instead of feel-good warning signs that are themselves litter.

A couple of days ago I caught this drought-related “message” displayed on the Amber Alert sign near Las Positas. Wasn’t this sign intended for emergency information about child abductions, drunk drivers, and serial killers?

I wouldn’t be surprised if someone decides post other useful and distracting information such as “Random farts can cause climate change” (followed immediately by “Breath deeply — avoid road rage”), “Always signal when changing lanes,” “Avoid speeding on sidewalks,” “Don’t waste food,” or “Stop listening to right-wing talk radio when driving.”

If there were any marketing-savvy politicians looking for the perfect place to advertise, and willing to pay $100,000 per day, the Amber Alert system would be a great platform. The first message should be “Don’t believe everything you think”.


Please note this login is to submit events or press releases. Use this page here to login for your Independent subscription

Not a member? Sign up here.