Four years ago next month, Dr. Dan Secord was the top vote-getter in a four-person primary in the race to be Santa Barbara County’s 2nd District Supervisor. Because no candidate received more than 50 percent of the vote, he went into a runoff with Janet Wolf, who ended up beating him in the November general election, 52.4 percent to 47.4 percent.
This year, there will be no runoff in November. For weeks and months, no one stepped up to face off against Wolf — now a seasoned incumbent with strong support — despite many rumors and a new political atmosphere that has invaded our nation, one that has shown kindness to candidates taking on liberal incumbents. That changed on the last week candidates were able to declare, when Secord, with prodding from supporters and armed with polling data (which Wolf and her supporters said was a push poll), jumped in. The district they now fight once again to represent is the smallest geographically of the county’s five districts and includes the Santa Barbara waterfront, the Mesa, the city west of Mission Street, as well as Noleta and much of Goleta.
With the county facing its third straight year of budget deficits, Secord’s focus this election is simple — the ability to operate and run the county starts and ends with the budget. “If you don’t have financial stability, you don’t have anything,” Secord said. He said he saw the warning signs when he ran four years ago and was prepared to deal with it. The former two-term city councilmember had dealt with a city budget for eight years and had taken a class taught by County Auditor-Controller Bob Geis, where the subject matter was in fact the county’s budget.
But voters went with Wolf, who for the last four years has made her own impact on the county. She has taken strong stands for the environment, voting against development on the Gaviota Coast and turning in the only “no” vote against the Miramar Hotel in Montecito, citing the need for further environmental review. She jumped into her role on the board full-throttle, armed with a soft voice but hard talk, asking probing questions of staff at meetings, taking CEO Mike Brown to task, and showing she did her homework.
But with a $39-million deficit looming, Secord said Wolf hasn’t done enough with the county’s finances, and she has allowed the county to slip into big problems. He blames her for cozying up to unions who supported her campaign, alleging she gave more than $45 million in raises to those same unions. He blames her for paying for projects like the spay-neuter ordinance and the Goleta Valley Plan, costing thousands of dollars in staff time. The 73-year-old Secord wants, as he did four years ago, to start a finance committee of two members of the board, a duo that will review county finances every month.
Wolf, for her part, was against such an idea four years ago and remains against it. “It was a bad idea then, and it’s a bad idea now,” she said, explaining that each member of the board needs to be a finance expert. Wolf pushed for a budget workshop in February, where the board could get updates from departments, see how potential cuts could impact the departments, and ultimately allow the board to list priorities to CEO Mike Brown on what they wanted to cut or not cut. This was in stark contrast to how things were prior, when supervisors would get the budget book in May “practically signed, sealed, and delivered,” she said. She also notes unions, in recent years, have agreed to furloughs, which saved the county in excess of $10 million, and are also discussing concessions in ongoing negotiations.
Wolf was an ardent supporter of the County Emergency Operations Center. The current Office of Emergency Services is located in the basement of the county administration building, while the current EOC — a temporary trailer — takes hours to get up and running, meaning it takes hours for information to be available to the public. Much of the money had been set aside after the Grand Jury had harped in the past on its inadequacy. Other funding was made possible by the Orfalea Foundation. Meanwhile, she was vocal in her opposition to the construction of the Cuyama Pool, which was built at some cost to the taxpayers but now sits without the funding to maintain it. “It’s about being a strategic decision-maker,” Wolf said. “You have to look at the entire picture.”
Secord, on the other hand, opposed both capital projects, and said many things need to be deferred as the county deals with a structural deficit. “We have to align spending with income,” Secord said. “If you want to straighten this out, I’m it.” Secord has spent two go-rounds on the Santa Barbara Grand Jury, a group that has taken the county to task on several items while Secord has been a member, including the pension. Both candidates agree the pension is a problem, and that the county’s liability has increased. When the market goes down, either employees or the county have to make up the difference, and because the employees’ contribution is set, it’s up to the county. They both agree the problem is not local and that it will take the board working together with employee groups to solve the issue.
While the budget has taken center stage, it’s not just the county’s finances at stake. After Census data is collected and organized, the supervisors will be tasked with redistricting come 2011. Should Secord upend Wolf, the board majority will lean to the right once again after two years of a more progressive board majority, which could spell trouble for 3rd District Supervisor Doreen Farr. The swing district geographically links the north and south counties, and should Secord win, the lines could be redrawn to favor a more conservative lean for the 3rd District and likely spell doom for Farr, who would be up for reelection in 2012. Both Wolf and Farr said it’s necessary to wait for the Census data to emerge before concluding what should be done. Wolf said the process will take “time, thought, and understanding.” Secord, who said he is currently reading books on redistricting, said he won’t make political decisions but decisions “based on reality.”
Wolf, who spent three terms on the Goleta School Board, has secured endorsements from all major unions, as well as most all progressive Democrats, including Rep. Lois Capps and 1st District Supervisor Salud Carbajal. Secord, who now sits as an alternate on the California Coastal Commission, is endorsed by former 3rd District Supervisor Brooks Firestone, retired city finance director Bob Pierson, and others.
Vote-by-mail ballots are out, and Election Day is June 8.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Janet Wolf has always been very accessible and she listens to people.
Secord is not accessible, and votes against protecting Santa Barbara's beautiful coast. As a coastal commissioner, Secord - a long time politician - has one of the worst voting records. He frequently votes to lessen protection of California's coastline.
Wolf stands up for residents. She has continuously and strongly supported rent control in County mobile home parks.
Secord is a threat to rent control in mobile home parks.
Please join me in voting for Wolf.
goleta43 (anonymous profile)
May 13, 2010 at 2:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It all starts and ends with the budget. This board continues to put off the hard decisions required not only to balance the books this year, but dealing with an even bigger deficit next year. As for Secord. He was one of the two coastal commissioners who favored protecting Goleta Beach, not letting it wash away. This year, they are looking at once again using the dwindling reserves. For most governments, they keep 15-20% of their operating budget as a basis for reserves. Using this at the low end, the County should be sitting on a rainy day fund of $120 million. Do you know what they have???? $16 million. That equals what the City of SB has after their huge cuts.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
May 13, 2010 at 2:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Janet Wolf continues to bury her head in the sand and avoid the problem the county is facing. Santa Barbara has big money trouble and we need someone who will admit that there is a problem to lead us out of the dark. Dr. Dan you have my vote.
drbenk (anonymous profile)
May 13, 2010 at 2:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hmmm, if SB County has such bad, bad money troubles, how come it has the very highest bond rating? I'll tell you why. Because the current board has acted very responsibly to manage the shortfalls in revenue, the result mostly of a very bad national and international economy, and the result of a moronic CA governor who keeps taking away county revenues.
We should be grateful for Wolf's leadership...and most people are. But Secord is mired in what can only be termed "desperation politics." He is trying to create a crisis because otherwise he will lose the election to Wolf...again.
By the way, there is more to being a Supervisor than managing a budget, something Secord doesn't want voters to notice. But we noticed the letter of support he received from North County businesspeople, offering his support so he will be in line to redistrict a North County majority.
So Secord supporters can whine but they can't change the reality. Wolf had been working hard to manage the deficits and our bond rating shows the financial community has great confidence in the financial future of SB County. You know what they say, "Money talks" so Secord...take a walk.
Richard_Saunders (anonymous profile)
May 13, 2010 at 3:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Oh yay. It's stupid season again.
Pinatubo (anonymous profile)
May 13, 2010 at 7:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Have to love the scare tactics being thrown out there randomly by Wolf's campaign people, a laundry list of unsubstantiated bunk. Talk about "creating a crisis:" mobile home rent control? Come on, give me a break. I think that may have been an issue four years ago when the city of SB was considering annexing parts of the unincorporated area. Today it's not even on the table. No one's talking about it except the Wolf camp. Makes you wonder about some of their other claims.
Let's get back to governing the county and focusing on the real issues, like the budget crisis. (And yes, Janet, it is a crisis.)
sb0320 (anonymous profile)
May 13, 2010 at 11:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This race is much ado about nothing.
But two points need some discussion that are raised in the article.
Number One, anyone who thinks that the County's AA bond rating is something special, I say puhleeezeee! It is no big deal. Ultimately, all public financing is based on the same bond ratings unless a political subdivision declares they are bankrupt.
Number Two, I attended the so-called February budget "workshop." It was an exercise in futility. At one point, Ms. Wolf admitted she did not know if the County needed to trim $39 million or $18 million.
There was no redeeming value in terms of the budget that arose from the so-called budget "workshop." What a joke!
Besides, the governor's May revise only came out yesterday so whatever thought has gone into the County's budget will have to be re-done to meet the impacts of state funding allocations, or the lack thereof.
Puhleeezee people! Demand more from the candidates you support. You are smarter than that to allow mediorce, second-rate smoke-and-mirrors to guide you.
Just my opinion. Have a wonderful day !
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 5:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Secord supporters play fast and loose with facts. Detokevilla, poo-pooing the County's bond rating, doesn't recognize that financial experts rate borrowers based on their financial prospects. The AA++ SB County has earned can been seen in the context of the State's lousy bond ratings. See http://www.treasurer.ca.gov/ratings/h...
Not only does SB County's excellent bond rating relative to areas that ARE in crisis such as California, reveal that Secord is grossly exaggerating SB County's financial challenges. Most importantly, it shows that financial experts confidence that with Wolf's leadership, our County's leadership is well positioned to address our finances both now and in the future.
Nice try, Secord supporters. Our highest bond rating DOES expose Secord as either financially inept, politically desperate, or both.
Richard_Saunders (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 8:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Janet Wolf is arrogant and unavailable to her constituents. I tried to meet with her on a very important issue and she refused. Her mind was made up and she did not want to hear the facts.
Dan Secord is a sensible, skillful, and accessible candidate, highly qualified to get this county out of its mess. He won't spend money on nonsense. He's a fiscal conservative, who knows budgets and has common sense.
dogsmom (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 9:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
[insert your candidate name here] is arrogant and unavailable to his/her constituents. I tried to meet with her/him on a very important issue and s/he refused. His/her mind was made up and s/he did not want to hear the facts.
[insert the hated other candidate's name here] is a sensible, skillful, and accessible candidate, highly qualified to get this county out of its mess. S/he won't spend money on nonsense. S/he's a fiscal conservative, who knows budgets and has common sense, likes puppies, and has all the right values, you know, the ones that are important.
Chester_Arthur_Burnett (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 9:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The Indy author got his verb conditions wrong.
The report should not be "the [District boundary] lines could be redrawn to favor a more conservative lean for the 3rd District"
but instead should be
"the lines WILL be redrawn to favor a more conservative lean for the 3rd District"
If Secord is elected, the Supervisorial District boundaries will be gerrymandered to guarantee a permanent 3-2 majority of Supervisors.
David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
May 14, 2010 at 11:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What's the matter Saunders? You forget that little detail that the County's budget last year and this year are being balanced on one time reserves? Less than $18 million in reserves for an agency who's budget is over $800 million? A shortfall of another $10 million minimum exists for next year already. No "bond rating" is going to save us from fewer services in health, fire, sheriffs, parks, etc.
As for Prichett. You must live in the clouds if you think either side wont gerrymander to their own benefit. Regardless if it's Wolf or Secord.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 2:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Saunders nice try at political spin, but here is some sober reality for you: Plenty of us investors have several coupon clipping alternatives. Should Santa Barbara County start borrowing too much, they are not the first girl we will ask to go to the prom.
But I digress.
Let's discuss why the Board of Supervisors spends an hour and a half every week handing out Resolutions to themselves while engaging in cheesy bragging about the great job they do and all of the problems they are solving.
Then right after all that bragging, the Board shifts to the departmental agenda that is grossly litered with layers of problems and situations that have not been addressed.
Do you see the nonsense in this Saunders?
Oh, and as Board chairman, Ms. Wolf increased the tacky self-promotion of bragging by giving each Board member an hour of time to talk about themselves and every detail of everything they do each day of the week. I am for one am so happy to know they have to tell us when they go to the bathroom. It is so reassuring.
And a last thought Saunders. Ms. Wolf is obssessed with talking about the "County Family" and that the Board's most important priority is saving "County Family" jobs.
Well Robert Saunders, please answer this question: Why aren't the Board of Supervisors concerned about the "County Breadwinners" who are not County employees but who are actually paying for the lucrative salaries and benefits of the Board's "County Family." By the way, the Board doesn't have the money to meet their pension obligations. But again, I digress.
Only my opinion. Not gay but hugs and kisses to everyone!
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 3:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Not gay but hugs and kisses to everyone!" -- detokevilla.
Oh my word no! Certainly not gay... not from a great steaming pile of straight-talking, record-straightening man-flesh such as yourself, detokevilla!
So.
NOT.
Gay.
Never.
Toodle-loo!
binky (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 3:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
detokevilla, please read for comprehension. I am Richard Sauders, not "Robert."
Yes, the county has financial challenges. You may have heard about the recession we are in brought about by 8 years of borrow and spend Republican policies, and tax cuts for the rich. You also might have heard about CA's governor who said that if he didn't restore the vehicle licensing fees to levels before the surplus, he would get rid of waste, increase commerce and CA's economy would be swell. How's that working out for you?
These 2 gross factors, including Schwarzegger repeatedly making off with County revenue, have caused major financial problems that the Supes have been dealing with, including getting major concessions from its employees and unions.
There are challenges for the pensions, and yes, we've had to tap reserves. But the point is that the Supes are doing a pretty good job. Them's the facts, regardless of how you and Secord try to spin it.
Best wishes, but no kissing thanks.
Richard_Saunders (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 4:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Deficit Spending is generational theft - expecting our children to pay the bill sometime in the future for today's irresponsible government spending. Janet had her chance and did nothing to bring county spending under control and now she should move on. She seems unable to understand finances but she is a nice person.
reality_check (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 4:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Binky, ask Robert Saunders about me since he knows how to read tea leaves ... Saunders says I am for Secord, which I am not .. and you seem to think I am gay .. which I am not .. but neither am I against my gay friends for being gay ... that is their life .. nor am I for Secord ... but I am against self-serving, second-rate politicians .. Ms. Wolf will be re-elected .. I just don't think she earned or deserves re-election but it isn't all her fault .. it is a topic for another discussion .. and I suggest the the discussion centers around why the best amongst us are refusing to consider elective office ... the outcome is we are left with some very poor choices .. Have a Wonderful Day !!!!
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 4:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ms. Wolf has linked her political career to her budget trade-offs with Joni Gray based on a promise that Gray supports Wolf for re-election.
However Gray is supporting Secord.
But worse. Joni Gray is the Board Chair in 2011. Gray constantly reminds the people of Santa Barbara County that she, Joni Gray, is a "trained lawyer."
Well a quick fact check shows that Gray is a liar. Joni Gray does not have a bono fide law degree from a Law School.
It get's worse.
Joni Gray's hand-picked person for the 5th district is Steve Lavaganano.
Guess what?
Yup, according to FactCheck.com, Steve does not have a college degree.
So here we are, in the mnidst of a budget crisis and the line-up are 3 votes for more insanity: (1) Gray no law degree, (2) Lavaganano -- No college degree; and (3) Wolf submissive to Gray's commands.
We are seriously in for a fun time folks in 2010-2011. And with these underacheiving clowns, expect the worst.
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
May 15, 2010 at 1:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
SECORDif we want this city to survive at all. Vote Wolf (and her DEMOcrat wolf-pack) out. That's DEMO... as in demolishing everything we hold dear... enough unions, payoffs, unfunded everything... enough enough enough. How long has this county been Democrat ruled? And look what we've got? Gangs, murders at popular beaches, budget woes, aggressive panhandlers... it ain't goin' a good direction, folks. SECORD for a second chance!
maximum (anonymous profile)
May 16, 2010 at 2:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Is it my imagination or do some of the bloggers here have a tend icy to be silly?
sixdolphins (anonymous profile)
May 16, 2010 at 3:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
F.Y.I. memo to sixdolphins: we do not live in isolation from the rest of the state.
The political bloggers across the state are already gearing up and are going to have a feast on this County Board make-up in 2011.
We must face up to reality because other's are going to point out the reality of the Board members whether or not we bury our heads in the Goleta beach sand and ignore comparisons to other County Boards across the state.
Let's face reality sooner rather later.
It hurts far less to accept our red-headed step child we keep hidden in the attic rather than face the embarrassment from our friends throughout the state when they point this out.
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
May 16, 2010 at 1:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Memo to Chairman Wolf:
Three questions Madam Chair -- #1: Why is our neighbor to the south, San Luis Obispo County much wealthier than we are? San Luis has nearly 5 times the money in their budget reserve account than we do, approx. $80 million versus our $16 million. Yet they have almost 120,000 less population than we do. Something is not adding up. My source is factcheck.com.
Question #2: Why is our neighbor to the north, Ventura County able to allocate almost 6.5% of their annual discretionary budget for mental health services & programs, while we only do slightly more than 2% annually? Yet Ventura County has more than twice our population? Something isn't adding up Madam Chair and inquiring minds want to know why the mathematics is so schewed. During your tenure we cut residential beds for mental health clients. That's a shame.
#3: Why are both our neighbors to the north and south spending less than $1,000 per 1,000 population per capita than we are for public safety departments even though the crime index per capita is essentially equal for all three Counties? San Luis gets by with about $963 per 1,000 people with the same crime index as Santa Barbara County. Ventura County gets by with about $998 per 1,000 people with essentially the same crime index as our County even though Ventura County faces far greater law enforcement challenges because they have to deal directly with problems that spill over from Los Angeles County?
Just being fair and seeking some answers since some of your supporters claim you have a sterling record as a County Supervisor.
Oh and by the way, before your 6-member Staff blogs that I am full of hot air, I should let it be known that I do not support your opponent. I am very happy with your environmental record.
But let's be fair, Secord also has a proven track record on environmental issues. According to factcheck.com Second was a solid pro-environmental vote while he served as Chairman of the California League of Cities Environmental Quality Committee.
Nonetheless, you will win re-election.
So can you please provide some salient and intelligent responses to the 3 questions that are presented in this blog?
Thank you and have a wonderful Day !!!
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
May 16, 2010 at 3:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think "detokevilla" has his map upside down; the last time I looked SLO County is actually north of Santa Barbara County, and Ventura County is really east of us.
Perhaps too much "detoking" going on?
dalplan (anonymous profile)
May 17, 2010 at 1:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
LOL -- I stand corrected.
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
May 17, 2010 at 2:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Until detokevilla provides complete links to the data I'll consider the posts as blowing smoke. Please save us and provide the full links. And is it factcheck.ORG rather than .com?
Several things need to be pointed out. The budget is probably the most important issue of the day but not the only issue. Secord was managing a city budget in good economic times before the end of 8 years of the national republican/conservative Bush administration. The republican party has proven neither moral or conservative and that alone is enough to keep you and me from voting for Secord.
You have to remember that Secord was a horrible city council representative. He did not respond to my complaints. As a planning commissoner and council member he approved improper development, against existing neighborhood's opposition, I recall, 100% of the time. I don't recall Secord saying "no" to a developer.
My opinion is that Secord was a slow learner with regard to representation and proper development. I think Secord will be a slow learner with the budget and that is why he is proposing a filter "finance" committee. And how bureaucratic is that to suggest another committee.
I recall Secord approving commercial and upscale residential development while stating something like 'not every one can live here' with regard to a low income development and then lobbying for hangers for an expanding airport because airplanes have "thin skin." I consider Secord's style to be very elitist.
As usual it will take a democratic majority to correct this economic mess brought on by republican mismanagement. This includes representatives at the local level.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
May 18, 2010 at 7:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
While I understand that the national economy has an impact on local government, it would be disingenuous to my first grade teacher if I lowered my intellect into believing that our local county government fiscal mess is not our fault.
There is an utter lack of accountability coupled with an absence of "checks-and-balances" in County government. That is the fundamental problem and it has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the national economy.
And it primarily arises out of the reality that for the most part, the Board of Supervisors lacks the courage to require that departments stop their over-spending.
As one example, the DA Office is once again mired in massive debt because they cannot manage their staff.
Ultimately the mismanagement mess in the DA Office is also directly attributable to the fact that for too many years, there was no one in charge of that department. It was run like an animal house without the creativity of a John Belusi.
Just my my opinion. Hugs and kisses to everyone !!!
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
May 18, 2010 at 3:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Overspending on what? What departments need to stop spending and on what. What constituent service would you leave out. Some people need affordable housing and some people need affordable airplane hangers.
Clearly we have a corrupt system but it is the people that probably need reforming first and before the government can be reformed. Courage follows a responsible populace. Anyone with courage right now is singled out as the problem. Secord is not courageous as he hasn't the courage to challenge his constituents. He has challenged union lobbying as the problem but at least unions and their negotiated contracts are part of the democratic process. I doubt Secord would ever challenge his friends, the needy airplane lobbying constituent.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
May 19, 2010 at 8:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
very well-stated, I would have to agree with your basic points. And I don't support Secord.
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
May 19, 2010 at 11:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Incidentally, the over-spending in the DA Office is because they have more people than they need.
In the last two years, the DA has not been able to answer some basic questions regarding their case load.
It's my own humble but insightful opinion that the DA is cooking the books and inflating their case load statistics to grab more and more of the public money.
And the Board refuses to ask the tough questions and instead folds over for the DA.
The result? More money for wasteful spending in the DA Office takes away money for other critically needed programs that have a far greater societal need.
I think in June the Board should just say NO to the DA.
No more extra money.
Either straighten up your internal management and spend what you have which is more than adequate ot admit that you, the DA, is lying to the public about their caseload.
Just my Opinion. Have a Wonderful Day !
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
May 19, 2010 at 9:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)