One of Santa Barbara’s most distinctive buildings is the beautiful stone edifice at 1500 State Street, the home of Trinity Episcopal Church. Founded in 1866, the Episcopal congregation was the second Protestant denomination to hold regular services in Santa Barbara, after the Congregationalists.
There was no call for Protestant churches in Santa Barbara during the Spanish and Mexican eras; the population was united in the Roman Catholic faith. The few Americans who did settle here invariably converted to Catholicism if they wished to marry or own land. In the 1850s, the number of Protestant newcomers slowly grew in the aftermath of the Gold Rush and California statehood. The first Protestant sermon preached in Santa Barbara appears to have been by the Reverend Adam Bland, a Methodist circuit rider, in 1854.
The first Episcopal service took place on December 16, 1866, in the county courthouse, the former John Kays adobe, located in the same block where the courthouse is today. The name “Trinity” was bestowed upon the church the following March, reportedly at the suggestion of a parishioner who had attended an Episcopal church of the same name in New York City. The early membership roll of the church contained many familiar names, such as W.W. Hollister, Charles Fernald, Russel Heath of Carpinteria, and ship captain Martin Kimberly, to name just a few.
It soon became apparent that new quarters were needed. In September 1868, the parish held a fair to raise money to build a church in the first block of East Gutierrez Street on a lot donated by parishioner Samuel Brinkerhoff. The highlight of the fair was undoubtedly the serving of ice cream, a food heretofore unknown in the city. A loan fleshed out the building fund, and although the church was not quite finished, the first service was held there on Christmas Day 1868. It was the first Protestant church building in Santa Barbara.
Additional construction occurred in the early 1870s, but controversy arose. John Cornell, appointed rector in September 1873, did not approve of raising money by holding fairs and throwing parties. When it became apparent the congregation felt otherwise, he resigned after only five months in office.
The arrival of the Southern Pacific to Santa Barbara in 1887 marked the beginning of a new era for Trinity. The tracks went down the middle of Gutierrez, right past the church doors, and the resulting noise, dust, and smoke convinced parishioners to pull up stakes. The building was sold, and a new redwood church with a 120-foot steeple arose where the public library sits today at Anacapa and Anapamu streets. The congregation continued to grow, numbering more than 200 by the early 1900s.
Misfortune struck before dawn on December 20, 1903, when the church burned to the ground. Services were held later that day at the nearby Elk’s Hall. Funding for a new church moved forward slowly; not until 1912 did construction begin. In the interim, services took place in the church’s Sunday School building. Two Pasadena architects designed a magnificent native sandstone structure at 1500 State Street. The building cost $54,000, and the debt was not paid off until 1919.
The earthquake of June 29, 1925, virtually demolished the stone church. Once more, the congregation dedicated itself to rebuilding and renewal. The result was today’s Trinity Church, a triumph of the spirit and faith.
Related Links
Michael Redmon, director of research at the Santa Barbara Historical Museum, will answer your questions about Santa Barbara’s history. Write him c/o The Independent, 122 W. Figueroa St., Santa Barbara, CA 93101.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
Religion drags humanity down.
Riceman (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2012 at 5:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
but it's a lovely building and many good people pray there, that's OK, eh?
DrDan (anonymous profile)
March 14, 2012 at 3:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Something on the order of fifteen people are lodged on church grounds without supervision and the church campus has become littered with trash, garbage, human and canine and human excrement. After clearing the church grounds of several empty bottles of hard liquor and assorted refuse, I asked parish Rector Mark Asman to install portable toilet and a handwashing station but he refused to provide any sanitary or other services to the people. The church locks up its dumpsters, which consequently attract piles of rubbish.
I was confirmed at Trinity Episcopal and as a parishioner I am shocked that Mark Asman and the administration have run the church into the ground with their half-baked provision of camping privileges without any supervision or support. There have been multiple incidents of solid human waste depositions on the campus and still the Rector and his functionaries refuses to act. A big welcome mat, but no toilet, no soap, no sinks. Every tree in the place reeks, of one thing or another.
Most of the "homeless people" I have talked to are as fed up and disgusted as the parishioners but no one in the congregation dares to speak out for fear of excommunication...it is like we are in the Middle Ages and subject to the unbridled dictates clerical tyranny. The homeless suffer, the parishioners suffer, and the Rector simply pursues his ego-driven agenda to put his name in the history books, recklessly disregarding the suffering his actions are causing.
TEC is held hostage to a one-man dictatorship which, like that of Hugo Chavez in Venezuala, is driven by a distorted conception of compassion for the poor but is only creating a climate of polarization, suspicion and mistrust. The labyrinth was built and permitted to be a mecca for the spiritually minded, for tourists and residents alike, but now the place has become a slice of life from Dante's Inferno and there are no signs that Asman will repent of his misdeeds any time soon.
As a parisioner, or a former parishioner, I have filed a complaint with the bishop, who writes very well informed books, but, given the top-down centralism of the Anglican Communion, I don't expect any action until hell freezes over. If anyone knows where I can find a good canon lawyer who will work pro bono, please have them contact me as there is no way there is otherwise going to be any movement on this issue barring Divine Intervention.
Geof_Bard (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2012 at 5:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
'littered with trash, garbage, human and canine and human excrement'
Geoff - you've accurately described what many residents and businesses in the Milpas corridor are so upset about. When that is the condition the city allows to fester in your neighborhood, you begin to wonder who it is they actually serve. We too know the feeling of being shouted down by Asman and acolytes. What's really at stake here? Helping people, or furthering one's ego ambitions? It's admirable that you're volunteering to clean it up yourself, as we too have done often in our community. Unfortunately, that alone won't solve the problem. I used to visit the labyrinth often when I lived in that neighborhood. It's appalling to hear the conditions as you've described them.
SharonByrne (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2012 at 6:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I used to walk the labyrinth as a form of walking meditation and found it very soothing to the soul, very calming, a truly wonderful way to get in touch with that gentle inner peace which we all have.
Then one day Hobo Paul, a Urantia buff, decided that he would flop his sleeping bag down and demand silence and solitude for himself, everyone else be damned. I took the county's homeless ADMH outreach worker to him, he got housing, and I got the xxxx end of the stick.
Now the labyrinth and its lawn have become a latrine and, in punishment for blowing the whistle, I may be the first person in history of TEC to be discommunioned, Petitioning the bishop, I am not expecting to be given the time of day.
Episcopalians supported slavery and never evangelized the American West until the Pullman cars could get there. Things are not much different now; they are obsessed with a few showpiece projects, but when it comes to being real, forget about it.
Readers should know that Mark is also the COB at Casa Esperanza, and organization which is not at all popular with homeless people themselves. If people like Mark would only listen and open their minds to real people who are not wealthy donors or highly influential A-listers, things would be different, but the snobs at TEC are more concerned with posturing as compassionate than actualizing it. And Mark, you see, is far too busy and important to be in touch with the realities on the ground.
One of the issues they sweep under the rug is the use of cigarette privileges to bribe the homeless and the failure to teach them proper cough etiquette. In the long run, the shelters will cause more mortality and morbidity than they prevent.
Thus it comes as no surprise that they are committing this moral atrocity in which they demonize whistleblowers. It really makes the Holy Father, His Eminence Pope Benedict look like a Berkeley radical in comparison, and all of the pomp and glitter at Canterbury doesn't change any of this one whit.
The basic crime which Anglicans don't tolerate is that they can't stand it when anyone is actually a real person - they only want ikons, the image of a homeless person being "helped" to plaster all over fundraising letters. But all of the real complaints about the dehumanizing treatment they receive by the bullies staffing the shelters fall on deaf ears, as does the demand for basic humane sanitation at "Camp Trinity".
The Holy Bible states that all believers are a royal priesthood. The worst reactionaries of the the Episcopalian denomination just don't get that. They think the ordained are a master race lording it over mere mortals who, without the priests, have no access to grace.
Despite his left-liberal showpieces, Mark is probably the most retrograde and reactionary priest I have ever encountered in that he believes himself to be above criticism and to be especially annointed in ways that the "little people" don't understand.
Geof_Bard (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2012 at 8:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Per "reverend" Asman: This verse is the only time in the Bible the term "reverend" is used.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?...
billclausen (anonymous profile)
March 18, 2012 at 1:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You mean:
Psalm 111:9
9 He sent redemption unto his people: he hath commanded his covenant for ever: holy and reverend is his name.
KJV, also ASV.
Mark's title is "Rector".
------
Update on the Labyrinth Held Hostage
It seems that the entire corpus of Anglican officialdom has no interest in addressing the situation.
I've called the cops on aggressive Labyrinth Occupiers twice in the past two weeks. The officers were compassionate but firm however Trinity now attacks me for that principled action on my part.
I bear this abuse at the hands of religious autocrats with the strength of faith I derive from contemplation of the Stations of the Cross, the suffering of Jesus.
I stand humbly in the shoes of John Wesley, Spinoza and "such persons as wore long hair [who]should be excommunicated" in the War of the Whiskers.
They avoid the underlying issue: their half-baked illegal lodging harms the reputation of the homeless. Everyone but Mark, his aides, and three vagrants detest the ruination of the Labyrinth. Most homeless people agree with me and are disgusted by what has happened at TEC.
My job now is to shift the blame for this mess from the hapless homeless to the responsible party: Mark and his staff.
The Labyrinth is a meditation resource for the whole community, now ruined by nasty itinerants who refuse to get up in the morning and who refuse to simply sleep on the grass. They selfishly blockade the Labyrinth, Mark encourages their sense of entitlement, discommunes me and ignores my emails. How uncool is that?
Conscience has cost me many such friends as I may have had in the "liberal" faith community, Oh well. They aren't such great friends then, after all. Deitrich Bonhoeffer and Niemoller probably experienced the same sense of betrayal, albeit in more extreme circumstances.
Tommorow I will be having lunch with an ordained minister who is probably friends with both myself and Rector Asman. Perhaps there will be a brokered peace on this issue.
However I expect stonewalling on all sides and a protracted war of position in which I will be forced to the Right due to ineptitude on the Left.
I am not the least bit apologetic for my anger, it is appropriate. Jesus got angry at times. He also conducted a paramilitary operation at the Temple to drive from it those who desecrated,
I will continue to use nonviolent resistance against the tyrannies being inflicted on this community by the ruling elite of Trinity Episcopal Church.
My demand is simply to restore the Labyrinth as a site of contemplative practice not as a space for experimental Bolshevism. Even if I am abandoned by my so-called friends in the progressive faith community, I will be perfectly happy if I can at least serve God in this manner, and restore for God's sake, the respect due the Labyrinth.
Geof_Bard (anonymous profile)
March 19, 2012 at 9:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Mark's title is "Rector"."
Not according to their website: http://www.trinitysb.org/?page=sermon...
billclausen (anonymous profile)
March 19, 2012 at 9:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Wrecked her"...darn near killed her!
fivedolphins (anonymous profile)
March 23, 2012 at 2:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)