Credit: RJ Matson, CQ Roll Call

Voters have two things to consider in choosing a nominee to take on Trump: Who is best suited to take on a bully and liar in public, on social media, and on the debate stage? And how to craft a simple message strong enough to neutralize Trump’s use of race and immigration as a bogeyman capable of scaring his base? That message is Russia – a foreign adversary that Trump has made a friend.

A canon of literature exists on how to deal with liars. It unequivocally counsels refuting lies promptly with facts and not necessarily being polite about it. Trump’s lies are predictable. He also makes things up to suit the moment, regardless of the facts. The Democratic candidate has to have the skills to master the rebuttals to his lies, and be able to rapidly, both in person and on social media, respond to them.

In the recently concluded Democratic debates there were barely two references to Russia, and no emphasis on its ongoing attacks on our electoral process. Cory Booker and Bill De Blasio mentioned Russia once. Julián Castro made a reference to “Moscow Mitch”, alluding to Mitch McConnell’s refusal to bring legislation countering Russia’s attacks to the floor of the Senate. This lack of focus on Russia was a huge mistake.

Wallkit

We’re glad you’re a fan of The Independent

Now is the time to register to keep reading! Register for free and get access to two more free articles this month.

Register

Or get unlimited access when you subscribe today!

Wallkit

Thanks for being a loyal Independent reader!

You’ve read three free articles this month. Subscribe and get unlimited access to the best reporting available in Santa Barbara.

INDY+

$6/month or $60/year

INDY+ SUPPORTER

$10/month or $100/year

INDY+ PATRON

$500/year

Thanks for supporting independent regional news!

Login

Please note this login is to submit events or press releases. Use this page here to login for your Independent subscription

Not a member? Sign up here.