In an unexpected yet not entirely surprising move, Santa Barbara County Executive Officer Michael Brown-the county’s top bureaucrat- will be retiring next year. Rumors that Brown might retire started swirling on November 16, one business day after eligible county employees were to notify the Human Resources Department if they intended to participate in a countywide program offering an incentive for employees to retire early.
Under the deal, which is intended to save the county money, employees receive two years additional service credit toward their pensions, and their positions must stay open for at least six months following the retirement. Though official numbers hadn’t been tabulated, he is expected to be among several dozen employees who took the offer. Employees taking the “golden handshake” have to retire by Jan. 24, 2010. Brown will be retiring on Oct. 31, 2010, because he has a different contract with the board.
In a statement from the county sent Wednesday, which coincides with Brown’s 13th anniversary at the helm, 5th District Supervisor Joe Centeno said the board reworked the contract with Brown to keep him around to help with budget issues. “Mr. Brown will stay at the helm until October 31, 2010 and we are depending on him to lead us out of this financial quagmire.” Given his different contract, the position most likely will not stay open for the six months, but filled quickly.
Despite the rumors, Brown was coy about his intentions, even through Tuesday morning. He would only say that he was considering retirement, but hadn’t had a chance to discuss his situation with the Board of Supervisors. He was vague when asked if a story about him retiring would be incorrect, saying it “might be wrong.” Brown met with the board during a closed session hearing beginning at noon Tuesday, where the deal was presumably finalized.
On November 17, Brown didn’t return a phone call requesting comment but, through a brief email response from county spokesperson William Boyer, said only, “No decision at this time.” A public records request from The Independent that same day asking for a list of names, positions, and salaries of all county employees who indicated their intention to participate in the county’s “golden handshake” program still has not been answered. Neither 1st District Supervisor Salud Carbajal nor 2nd District Supervisor Janet Wolf would say Tuesday morning whether Brown had indicated to the board his intentions, citing personnel considerations.
After the announcement, Wolf said she wished Brown the “best of luck in his much deserved retirement” and that she was “looking forward to beginning the process” of finding a new CEO.
The announcement is certainly unexpected, but not shocking, as the writing for a move like this has been on the wall for some time. The rumors that Brown could be retiring didn’t come as a surprise to several county employees who were recently contacted.
Paul Wellman
Brown has seen many staffers, including several department heads, leave during his time in office, some because of Brown’s leadership.
The supervisors have been in the midst of a several weeks-long performance review of Brown, a review that included feedback from most department heads. Their feedback-on anything from his relations with subordinates, to the board, to the community-combined with that of the supervisors, amounted to a response that showed he was mediocre in most areas. It is not known how much Brown knew of the results of the evaluation, which was more interactive with department heads compared to past assessments.
Through this incentive program, Brown is getting a better pension deal than if he were to ride out the rest of his former contract, which was set to expire in May 2011. Though he would miss out on more than $150,000 in salary, Brown-whose final salary this year will be $251,697- would get about $97,905 a year in pension pay, roughly $7,905 more than if he stayed until the end of his contract through 2011.
The contract, which was formed by the previous board and made it much more expensive to get rid of Brown without cause, came in the midst of a lawsuit by former public defender Jim Egar, who alleged Brown screamed in his face, spit at him, and threatened to “slaughter” him in front of the supervisors. That lawsuit, however, was later dropped. Egar was one of 10 department heads to leave during Brown’s tenure. Current supervisors Wolf and Carbajal both voted against the contract extension.
Brown, no stranger to controversy, is now in the midst of more recent legal issues as well. On October 27, former county employee Shawn Terris filed a lawsuit against Brown and the county, alleging among other things discrimination and wrongful termination. She has claimed Brown has had it out for her for several years.
Paul Wellman
Over time, Mike Brown has done many things to simplify the budget process, but he also seized more control over various departments.
He also is now facing an allegation from consistent public commenter and board agitator Kate Smith that he hit her during a board meeting in April. Video from the meeting does show Smith coming up behind Brown as he sits at a staff table, and he does put his hand up, though it is unclear from the video what exactly happened. That case is scheduled in Santa Barbara Small Claims Court early next year.
Brown, said to value loyalty most in those below him, also recently lost two of his closest allies. One, John Baker, was an assistant CEO also in charge of the controversial Planning and Development Department. As part of an ordinance adjustment that reduced Brown’s control over county departments, the supervisors also indicated in their February vote that they wanted to be in greater control of hiring and firing of department heads, beginning with Baker’s replacement. They were, this summer hiring Glenn Russell from San Diego County.
The other employee, John McInnes, once considered one of Brown’s closest remaining allies, recently left to take over as the general manager of the Goleta Water District. McInnes was an assistant CEO to Brown, previously in charge of the Housing and Community Development department.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
I'm happy to say that power-mad, self-serving martinet will not be missed.
Terrific article!
binky (anonymous profile)
December 2, 2009 at 2:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Mike Browns' time will finally come to and end, but its too bad it won't happen sooner. The man is a megalomaniac and has mismanaged and damaged the county in ways too numerous to mention. The citizens of Santa Barbara deserve as their chief public servant, a person who actually believes in good governance, not a person whose singular goal over the past 14 years has been to dismantle the services provided by government by treating staff like serfs and using incompetent contractors under the guise of saving money. Let's hope he doesn't decide to go somewhere else and poison another county, like he did this one. But if he does, let's hope the electeds in that next place see the writing on the wall sooner than this Board did.
theresathefarmer (anonymous profile)
December 2, 2009 at 3:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks for the thorough report.
Moonrunner (anonymous profile)
December 2, 2009 at 4:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm reasonably sure that the Binky's of the world would find any competent executive to be a megalomaniac. In fact there are plenty of folks who would have liked Mr. Brown to be more successful in trying to "dismantle the services provided by government" since that government is so hugely oversized and expensive for a city of our size. If he was so bad, why was he in office for 14 years? Why didn't the Board fire him? Maybe because he took on the tough issues they were afraid to face up to...
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
December 2, 2009 at 5:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Good Luck Mr. Brown. It's a tough job being the top guy. Everyone is always out to get you thinking what is wrong is your fault. Those that have commented seem to forget that it's the elected board of supervisors that dictate policy. The problem currently sits with 2nd District co-supervisors Janet Wolf and "aid" Mary O'gorman. No concern for the normal citizen, just what makes the Environmental Defense Center happy regardless of the rest of us citizens that grew up here as well as raised our families here.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
December 3, 2009 at 10:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Janet is another Salud. Never say anything that might be construed as taking a position except on oil drilling. But damn she's hot since her makeover.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
December 3, 2009 at 1:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
http://santabarbara.legistar.com/Legi...
Looks like Brown will be gifted with a TWO YEAR "early retirement" bonus even though he's not really retiring "early"? at this Tuesday's Board of Supe meeting
sbsleuth99 (anonymous profile)
December 6, 2009 at 12:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ahhh yeah, Don't let the door hit you in the ass too hard.
bimboteskie (anonymous profile)
December 6, 2009 at 5:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Maybe the "gift" is so the Supes avoid a lawsuit for termination without cause, or maybe part of his contract if he has one. Lot's of possible reasons. The anger and envy in this town are corrosive. Ever had a management job? Any idea what it takes? Esp in this disgustingly politically correct town. Or do you just bitch...
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
December 6, 2009 at 8:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wasn't there another lawsuit, which WE the taxpayers paid for... and WE the taxpayers paid the settlement for when Mr. Brown was sued by an underling? Hmmm...
maximum (anonymous profile)
December 8, 2009 at 6:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Part of being a public employee is being defended by one's employer (the gov) in the performance of one's duties. Settlement is often cheaper than trial and does not indicate guilt or innocence. One might equally ask if the plaintiff wasn't just a golddigger. After all, making money of the government is pretty common in this town, as is the feeling that one is owed a living. Hmmmmm...
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
December 9, 2009 at 9:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow Mike & Bravo for a life dedicated to public service! From Austin to Santa Barbara County, you never lost the twinkle in your eye meaning the love for what you do. I have & shall always look up to you for swimming with the great whites.
Richard_Brown (anonymous profile)
March 19, 2010 at 6:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)