A lawsuit was recently filed on behalf of Craig Richter, principal of Foothill Elementary School, against the Goleta Union School District. The complaint says the district wrongfully threatened to fire Richter after he appeared in a promo video for last May’s 52nd Annual Community Prayer Breakfast, a nondenominational event meant to honor and raise cash for local educators, and attended by school teachers, elected officials, as well as members of the business community.
District officials, allege Richter’s lawyer, saw his participation in the video as an inappropriate breach of the separation between church and state. They said because Richter identified himself in the video as Foothill’s principal, he implied the district’s support and therefore crossed the line spelled out in the Constitution’s First Amendment. Richter — himself an evangelical Protestant — is being represented by Woodland Hills attorney Bill Rehwald.
Rehwald is one of 1,800 lawyers who work with a group called the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), a powerful legal force active in the evangelical movement. The organization is well-known for intervening in hot-button issues favored by the religious right, recently fighting to uphold California’s Proposition 8 and opposing federal spending for stem cell research.
Said ADF senior counsel Joseph Infranco, “It’s ridiculous to punish and fire a Christian administrator simply because he wanted to honor teachers at an event that includes prayer. The district’s contention that he was somehow violating the Constitution is not only unfounded, but absurd, as the video itself demonstrates.”
Filed last week, Richter’s lawsuit—which seeks an injunction preventing the district from firing him—traces the beginning of the ordeal back to last March when the Foothill principal was asked by organizers of the prayer breakfast to speak on a video meant to drum up recognition and support. Richter agreed, and the video was shot on his own time, eventually being posted on the Web site of the event’s promotional company. Santa Barbara School District Superintendent Brian Sarvis and San Marcos High School teacher Jamie DeVries appeared in the video as well. Both identified themselves by their professional titles.
Sarvis, who mentioned teachers attending the breakfast received $100 gift cards, also got flack for appearing in the video. After reportedly being criticized by a number of people who felt he overstepped his bounds, Sarvis asked the company (Believer’s Edge) that featured the video on its Web site to take it down. Representatives obliged, and the clip disappeared from the page.
Sarvis said it was the video’s placement, not content, that got him nervous. Where the clip was located on the Web site was a little dodgy, he said, as it made its message and speakers look too narrowly aligned with the company and its beliefs. Sarvis, though, said he never second-guessed appearing in the video, viewing his participation in the prayer breakfast as no different than his involvement in other community events.
During Richter’s roughly 45-second spot, he talked about the “tough but noble” work of teachers, urging them to remain diligent in these financially trying times. “For educators to be acknowledged and prayed for is both an encouragement and a great honor,” he said, with an American flag displayed prominently in the background. “Your support of the Community Prayer Breakfast is greatly appreciated.”
(Watch the video in its entirety below.)
“Personally endorsing a prayer event that invites people of all faiths to honor teachers should not be twisted into a Constitutional violation,” said Rehwald. “Principal Richter did a good thing, not a bad thing, and should keep his job.” Concurred Infranco, who specializes in Constitutional issues, “I think this is a school district that is simply uninformed of the law and is guilty of overreaching into someone’s private expression, probably out of ignorance.” Infranco said the threatening memo written to Richter and now included inhis file cannot be made public yet as it may be used as evidence if the case goes to trial.
After the video was shot, the complaint reads, Richter learned the Goleta Union School District decided not to officially participate in the event, worrying the breakfast would run long and prevent teachers from making it to class before the school day started. At no time, though, did it appear there was any kind of directive issued by Goleta Union School District officials or its superintendent, Kathleen Boomer, telling teachers they could not attend because of First Amendment considerations.
The breakfast—which by all accounts was an overwhelming success that featured high turnout, good vibes, and heartfelt support for area educators—was attended by a few elected officials, including Santa Barbara City Councilmember Das Williams, as well as teachers from Santa Barbara and Goleta.
In an interview with The Independent, Williams said that if Richter was indeed disciplined for being in the video, it’s a real problem. “Unless he was using school time to do it,” said Williams, a regular at prayer breakfasts, “he is allowed, like anybody else, to declare their faith or beliefs in his own time. It’s his business, not the school district’s.”
Williams pointed out that not only did teachers speak in person at the event, but Mayor Helene Schneider was also featured in a movie clip played at the breakfast. Those appearances weren’t issues, said Williams, and if all the claims laid out in the lawsuit are true, Richter’s shouldn’t have been either. The councilmember also mentioned he “respectfully disagrees” with the notion that, just by introducing himself as a school principal, Richter made it look like he was representing his employer.
It wasn’t until a Goleta Union School District boardmember later saw the promo video on YouTube that Richter’s involvement became a cause for concern, according to the lawsuit. Concluding that Richter’s speech was not okay, the district threatened in May not to renew Richter’s contract as principal in March 2011, and then placed him on a performance plan. The performance plan, said Infranco, is basically a form of punishment. And according to Rehwald, Richter was told that if the video had been seen before March 2010 — at which time his contract was renewed for the next year — he would have been fired then.
Richter, concludes the suit, thinks the district is using his religious beliefs “as a measuring rod of his performance for 2010” and should be called out for discrimination. “Though [Richter] does not openly advocate, share, or proselytize at work,” the complaint reads, “his beliefs are known to the district and [he] believes the district is looking for any excuse to get rid of him for his religious beliefs … [Richter] is an evangelical Protestant, holding traditional beliefs that Jesus Christ was God’s Son who died on the cross for the sins of this world.”
As almost an afterthought, Rehwald also writes that this purported act of discrimination may not be isolated, as the district has given Richter grief in the past for having a Good News Club—which promotes the same kind of religion he subscribes to—on his campus. District reps, said Rehwald, had also criticized Richter for approving a flyer that advertised an Easter Egg hunt at a nearby church.
Goleta Union representatives would not comment whatsoever on the pending lawsuit, citing personnel considerations. Superintendent Boomer, when asked for a response, said she couldn’t even really address the controversy because she hadn’t been served with the complaint yet. She also wouldn’t speak about district guidelines governing or examining possible breaches of separation between church and state, claiming that even general discussions of issues that pertain to Richter’s case would not be inappropriate.
School Board president Valerie Kushnerov had a similar response, saying, “There are always two sides to a story, and I would caution people about rushing to judgment.” Numerous calls placed to numerous district principals and teachers were not returned. Richter himself was unavailable for comment.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
He has every right to be a Christian, but he has no right to try to represent any aspect of the government as a Christian. When he is acting/identifying as an employee of a public school, he must remain neutral regarding religion. Nothing discriminatory about that. It applies to everyone, regardless of religion or lack thereof. Would the same people who are up in arms about this feel the same way if a Muslim teacher did the same thing? A Satanist teacher? An atheist teacher?
MichelleR (anonymous profile)
October 21, 2010 at 9:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Apparently, Goleta Union School District believes it has a valid license to hunt witch. Unfortunately, the costly court system will decide yea or nay as to whether or not they do.
While I personally think "prayer"---for the purposes of beseeching favorable intervention or consideration from an imaginary being---is about as effective as whistling to chickens for help in ensuring a magical toy in a McNugget Happy Meal ®, Mr. Richter's brief promotional appearance in the video above seems quite benign in that it hardly amounts to his painting a justifiable target on his professional credential sufficient to cause his dismissal, or threats toward that end, from the GUSD.
If there are other issues at play such as prior or subsequent instances of religious indoctrinary actions being displayed or undertaken on campus by Mr. Richter during school hours, then the normal district and teacher's union approved disciplinary remedies should apply and be exercised in the form of proper written and/or verbal warnings as well as whatever necessary investigative hearings are required to air and address grievances on both sides.
Surely there are graver issues facing the school district in budget shortfalls, teacher layoffs, and other devastating educational cuts requiring positive focus, energy, attention, and action than is being needlessly expended in mounting brooms and circling cauldrons over what appears to be nothing more than a minor lapse in judgment or, at best, much abrew about nothing.
Draxor (anonymous profile)
October 21, 2010 at 9:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
He's one moustache away from looking like Ned Flanders.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
October 21, 2010 at 10:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Personally endorsing a prayer event that invites people of all faiths"
Yes, Catholics, Protestants AND Jews! ALL faiths!
Rich (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2010 at 12:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Draxor is right - surely the District has weightier matters to deal with, especially including the cost of pursuing this.
SezMe (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2010 at 2:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Is there more to this story. It's hard to believe the district would be that blatantly biased as to punish him for that video. If they are, he has a clear cut case of discrimination.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2010 at 3:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Draxor and SezMe seem to be under the impression that the district instituted the lawsuit. Richter brought the suit. The district had no way of knowing he would do so.
I'm not sure how Mr. Richter was harmed. The district didn't fire him. What would the injunction do? Protect him in a future, similar instance?
I agree with MichelleR: practice your religion to your heart's content, but as private citizen rather than a government employee.
jimstoic (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2010 at 8:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This video was sent to all students' families? No? Then what's the fuss? Mein Gott in Himmel! (Gott is capitalized because it's a verb.) Let the Christian school employees drink holy water and sacrifice chickens to their hearts' content, on their own time. Let them brag about it amongst themselves.
True, evolution is taught in the public schools with ridiculous provisos & no mention of higher primates. Teachers are muzzled by admin, I believe. That's just flat wrong, but two wrongs don't make a right.
Adonis_Tate (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2010 at 8:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Here's a couple of quotes about the prayer breakfast, taken from the website of the organizer (http://www.believersedge.org/video/ce...
"Tom Reed, the Director of the Unity Shoppe shared that this was a gathering that was open to people of all faith. 'We come, however, in the Spirit of Jesus and being follower of His teachings.' He helped those that were in the room not feel like they had simply been invited to a Christian gathering... " According to the website, the breakfast also featured "Amy Alzina, the principal of Adams School" who "gave a powerful message to the gathering on the greatest teacher who ever lived- Jesus Christ."
Seems to me that this was exactly a Christian gathering, to which others were invited. Moreover, the organization that sponsored the breakfast was not only Christian, but clearly a group whose purpose is to proselytize through events like this one. Again from the website: "We believe that each of us have a God-given assignment to influence the culture of Government, Business, Arts, Media, and Education within our own community."
Obviously people have every right to attend such an event on their own time, but to ask others also to attend, citing your position as the principal of a public school, is walking the line between the separation of church and state. I'm a big Das Williams fan but this is not his area of expertise - as a mom with kids in a Goleta Union elementary school, I hope that the Board did impose some discipline.
twocents (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2010 at 11:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"Jesus Christ was God’s Son who died on the cross for the sins of this world."
lol
TheJesus (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2010 at 3 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"(Gott is capitalized because it's a verb.)"
It's a noun, isn't it?
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2010 at 9:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Oops, jah!
Adonis_Tate (anonymous profile)
October 23, 2010 at 2:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'll bet if he was muslim the boardmembers would be falling over each other to be the first to pat him on the back and looting the district funds for prayer blankets all around.
birddog (anonymous profile)
October 23, 2010 at 10:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mtk8av...
sixdolphins (anonymous profile)
October 23, 2010 at 6:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Oh my pink liberal trousers! How dare he do such a thing! I'm shocked and disturbed. Disturbed and shocked.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
October 24, 2010 at 11:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The only problem the current admin board has w/ him is that he's not pro-taliban/al-quaeda, isn't a fan of Che Guevarra, Fidel Castro or Hugo Chavez, more than likely opposes Stalinism, believes in capitalism, he's "white" or of European ancestry & is probably against gangs, that's all. Did I leave anything out? :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2010 at 11:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
He is a christian.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2010 at 1:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Did they serve bacon or sausage?
Walter (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2010 at 9:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
So a pig walks into a restaurant and the maître d' says "we don't serve pigs here" so the pig says "I don't want any pork, I want salmon".
sixdolphins (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2010 at 8:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Seriously people, if the guy was a Muslim and participated in a video as the "principal of Foothill School" and asked people to please come to a Muslim prayer breakfast because that would be great encouragement for teachers, there would be a huge uproar and lots of people would be calling for his dismissal. It's only because it was a Christian event that anyone is tolerating it.
twocents (anonymous profile)
October 26, 2010 at 10:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)