Madam Pleads Guilty to Charges She Ran Brothel
Woman Had Fled Authorities for the Past 10 Years
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Susan Mangan - arrested just last month after skipping town and for a decade escaping charges that she ran a prostitution house in Santa Barbara - decided against going to trial and pled guilty Wednesday to charges related this activity.
Mangan, in court to set a date for her preliminary hearing, instead took Senior Deputy District Attorney Joyce Dudley’s offer for the same time behind bars her husband Brian Mangan received after being found guilty by a Santa Barbara jury of the same charges years ago. Dudley filed nine counts against Susan Mangan in Superior Court November 13, but Mangan ended up pleading guilty to only five: two counts of pandering by procuring two women to be prostitutes, two felony counts of pimping the two women, and a misdemeanor count of “keeping a house of ill-fame.”
Mangan will be on the next bus out of town to the Valley State Prison for Women, where she will stay until authorities evaluate her and decide where she will spend her three years in prison.
The Mangans’ brothel, Anna’s Touch on Canon Perdido Street, was uncovered in 1998 when police responded to a robbery at the address. As the robbery investigation continued, officers determined the home was a house of prostitution. An arrest warrant was issued for Susan Mangan, but she fled the city.
Susan Mangan
Mangan had been teaching at the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco, and living with Brian Mangan-who had served three years in prison and was released-in Oakland, where she was eventually tracked down by authorities.
Mangan’s attorney, Robert Landheer, said that more than likely, given the evidence, a jury would have found her guilty. “Sometimes the battle is not worth the scortched earth that follows,” he said. He also alleged that the charges she was facing were designed to punish those who enslaved people to work in the sex industry and, conversely, the prostitutes who worked with Mangan were women who “wanted work, needed work, and took work.” Finally, Landheer noted that prostitution was legal in other countries. Mangan also described her activities more innocently than the charges against her do. She told Judge Eskin on Wednesday morning that she was “basically matchmaking between two consenting adults where sexual activity occurred and money was exchanged.”
Offering a different point of view, Dudley said that through her prosecution of this case, she’s learned “pimping and pandering : are not victimless crimes.” According to Dudley, the two women, who were still in their teens at the time, now each hold respectable jobs and are mothers. But their involvement with Mangan “caused a lot of chaos in their lives,” Dudley said.
In addressing Eskin, Mangan said she’s had a lot of time to think about her situation. “And I really believe that future generations are going to put my crimes up on the shelf with a lot of other women’s crimes from history,” she said. “Crimes of the Salem witches, inquisitions in Europe, crimes of gentile women having sex with Jewish men in Nazi Germany, the crime of a woman marrying a Chinese man here in California in the early 20th century, and the crime of black-white sex, the crimes of fornication, premarital sex : And, I take full responsibility and pride in being in the same league as all of the women that have suffered for sexual crimes throughout history.”
CORRECTION: This story has been corrected so that an opinion about the two former prostitutes is attributed to Joyce Dudley.
Comments
I'd be interested in hearing what the women who were employed at "Anna's Touch" have to say about all this.
Do they believe the Mangans should have been prosecuted?
Moonrunner (anonymous profile)
December 4, 2008 at 4:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The two women, who were still in their teens at the time, now each hold respectable jobs and are mothers, but that "this caused a lot of chaos in their lives," she said.
That is not a sentence. And it's horrid biased reporting, juxtaposing facts with the opinion of Dudley in order to try to make the latter seem factual. That word "but" gives it away -- it's in the reporter's voice yet supports Dudley's claim. But neither Dudley nor Meagher are legitimate authorities on these women's lives. A real reporter would find out, and tell us, what they have to say rather than mouthing the words of an extremely biased DA with a large vested interest.
jqb (anonymous profile)
December 5, 2008 at 12:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Victimless crime....Ask the poor girl who was terrorized by the armed robber when he went into that little matchmaking home....That's how this all unfolded...
azuresees (anonymous profile)
December 5, 2008 at 6:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
azuresees, perhaps if these establishments were allowed to operate in the open they would not attract all this frivolous and unrelated crime activity. The police would be protecting them rather than requiring that they operate in secret from protection. Again we hear illogical arguments where one person calls for decriminalization of victimless crimes, and someone else refutes, charging that the characteristics of the black market activity will increase when they would in fact virtually disappear.
How in the world, in a free society, do we decide that the government can tell us what we can and cannot do with our own bodies? This is tyrannical and it is causing unnecessary crime, just like all black markets tend to do. We learned our lesson from alcohol prohibition, but we won't learn our lesson about other victimless crimes because they aren't as big a part of the classical American tradition, like alcohol.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
December 5, 2008 at 10:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree with loonpt. In Germany prositution is legal, and prositutes are registered. They have to be medically checked on a regular basis for STDs. Isn't it better this way?
CommonSense (anonymous profile)
December 5, 2008 at 12:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Yeah legalized Marijuana seemed to do well for those medical marijuana places, opps sorry I forgot they got robbed and broken into all the time, bad example of legalizing a criminal act that people somehow feel will solve the problem.
And going along Loonpt train of thought who is the government to say the NAMBLA should not be able to practice what they most want to, I mean it is two people just using their bodies. Where does your train of logic end or start conforming to the "tyrannical:black market"? Would your solution call for legalized "hit men" so they wouldn't have to hide their practices? Of course this is tongue in cheek.
Your oversimplification of an act is a sign of ignorance. An act that shocks the public's conscious is not good or healthy for the society as a whole. To legalize it would show approval by that society further confusing the social morals. And the simple argument that "oh well so and so does it" is really asinine. There are customs and practices all over the world in other countries that would not be wanted here (ie veiled women, forced abortions, polygamy, etc). The old saying," if Germany jumped off a bridge would you?" seems to fit your argument nicely.
If a part of our society wants to champion a cause where certain acts are excusable does not mean it serves a purpose or good for the entire society, only the self-deprecating portion of it.
InTheKnow (anonymous profile)
December 5, 2008 at 7:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
My boyfriend of over 6 years had a dark secret he had been sleeping with one of those call girls before he met me.he never told me i found out by accident when i asked him he got mad at me.he knows everything about me,come to find out he did it with other people involved with these people,so ya im pissed he never told me.i hope the nasty broad that worked there whom name started with a d and last name starts with s. You are first of all nasty.second of all when you mess with someone as kind as him you have to know your hurting someone better than you,with sex.dirty unmeaning sex.and leading them on.your the reason he doesn't know how to respect women.and now i cant ever really trust him because he kept a huge dark secret,i cant stand whores like you and im glad that guy had a gun and tried to rob your skanky ass!as for dragon and his old ass wife,try having a business that means something and quit trying to scam married men out of there pay checks.injoy jail you nasty poor excuse of a woman!and to all of you who are trying to defend these folks your nasty to!morals are gone now a days,i feel sorry for losers
missmpussykat (anonymous profile)
July 6, 2009 at 4:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)