About 20 people filled the patio of a Mesa home Monday afternoon to listen to Ishmael Khaldi, policy advisor to Avigdor Liberman, the Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs. The Anti-Defamation League of Santa Barbara/Tri Counties and the Jewish Federation of Greater Santa Barbara put on the event, and Khaldi’s stop in Santa Barbara was one of several on his tour of California and Nevada. Khaldi has recently published a memoir, A Shepherd’s Journey, The Story of Israel’s First Bedouin Diplomat.
“I’m speaking because I feel there’s a need to talk,” Khaldi began, whose work as an advisor to Liberman began last year. He recently returned to Israel after living in San Francisco, where he held the position of Deputy Consul General for about two-and-a-half years.
His daily routine and responsibilities begin at 4 a.m., he said. He reads news from around the world and is at his office by 6 a.m. A big part of his job as a diplomat, he went on, is traveling and speaking at high schools and colleges both in Israel and abroad; this particular tour is his fifth in the last six months.
He addressed the group with a brief background on his humble beginnings and described his first journey to the United States. He boarded his first flight as a young man who had never even left his Bedouin village — with a population of 450 — let alone Israel. He arrived in New York City, and when he called the only phone number he knew, it was a stranger on the other end, not the friend he was expecting. He thought the only option he had was to board the first flight back, but he told himself, “I came, and I have to survive.” He found help from someone in the airport and headed to Brooklyn.
Eventually, Khaldi returned to Israel to go back to school. He attended Tel Aviv University and has since worked for the Israeli Defense Ministry, the Israeli Police Force, and as a political analyst for the Israeli Defense Force. In 2004, he joined the Foreign Ministry, then eventually landed in San Francisco. He is Israel’s first Bedouin diplomat.
Khaldi said when he graduated high school, he would never have imagined he would lead the life he does. Until the age of eight he lived in a tent crowded with his parents and siblings. It was his parents who recognized his talent and encouraged him to continue his education beyond high school. He is the only one of his 11 siblings to attend college.
Khaldi then spoke about the more political aspects of his job and addressed the Gaza conflict. He said that the conflict with Palestine is up and down, but “nothing is moving.” He recognized that Israel is not a perfect country, and knows that cooperation is key in this struggle.
“I have to calm down and hold my horses,” he said. “I cannot change the world.”
Khaldi made clear to the group that he doesn’t think Hamas represents the Palestinians of Gaza. He said that not only could the Palestinians overthrow Hamas, it’s their responsibility to do so.
“The Palestinians deserve a state of their own,” he said. “Gaza is a third-world country. Their infrastructure is not like Santa Barbara,” and services such as medicine and technology are not as available as they are throughout most of Israel.
“The ones who are suffering today are the people in Gaza,” he added.
In addition to being the first Bedouin diplomat in Israel, Khaldi — a Muslim — is part of the approximately 20 percent of Israelis who are not Jewish. He said it doesn’t create too much conflict in his job; his Israeli spirit is strong. He said he and other minorities in Israel still have the same rights and proudly identify with Israeli culture.
“It gives me more motivation,” he said. “At the end of the day, you’re Israeli.”



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
So which Muslim nation would tolerate a 20% Jewish minority?
revisionist (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2010 at 8:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Rev, another question is which Muslim nation would tolerate the mere presence of ANY other faith/religion? :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2010 at 9:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Kind of a weird statistic to pursue, revisionist. After all, Jews only make up about 2% of the US population -- and we have the world's second largest contingent. And the high range of total Jewish population in the world is only about 18 million. Contrast that with the approximately 23 million Sikhs in the world.
So the impact of Jews on almost any general population will be minimal, no matter the level of, as you say, tolerance.
That said, it would be hard to dispute that Muslin nations tend to favor their own, and the reality that like favors like.
Chester_Arthur_Burnett (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2010 at 9:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It's not who you know, its who Bedouin? No, wait... The enemy of my enemy is my friend, that's it.
Time Magazine reported on Bedouin disaffection in Egyptian Sinai, where Bedouins are in the majority. Some informants yearned for the good old days of Israeli occupation. The article's authors later found themselves in the hot seat for reporting such Bedouin sentiments. The North Sinai local council (apparently non-Bedouin) "shouted demands for the names of sources and locations. They expressed indignation at the mention of pro-Israel Bedouin and the report that some Bedouin even cheered for Algeria (Egypt's fiercest soccer rival)...." Chilling.
And it's not like Israel is nice to the Bedouins, restricting their movements and all.
Well, that part of the world is big on stratification, of persons, families, clans, tribes.... Israel may be better than some countries in that respect, as bad as it is. But if you're not Jewish (for example, an average American taxpayer supporting Israel) don't expect anything like gratitude or respect.
Adonis_Tate (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2010 at 5:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Religious minorities did very well in Muslim lands - the history of muslim rule has been very tolerant of other religions. It is only recently that we've seen violence and intolerance by muslims - and that is a direct result of occupation, colonization and oppressive dictators installed by western countries.
This is history. Verifiable and accepted by respected scholars.
jaysaxena (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2010 at 10:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Muslim countries accepted Jewish populations fleeing the Christian Inquisitions and persecutions in medieval Europe. Some of medieval civilization's greatest achievements took place in Muslim Spain, where Jews were part of a scientific and artistic blooming. Many Jews came to hold political office in Muslim countries all the way up to 20th century Ottoman Turkey.
MacMahler (anonymous profile)
June 30, 2010 at 12:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"occupation, colonization and oppressive dictators installed by western countries." -jaysaxena
This is the only issue we need to concern ourselves with because it is the primary cause of the violence we see today, throughout the world. Israel, specifically, institutes these practices against Palestine. Occupation - checkpoints, fences, blockades, concentration camp-like conditions - Check. Colonization - Israeli Settlements - Check. Installed Dictators - Hamas was created by Israel to help defeat the Fatah - Check.
If Israel wasn't occupying Palestine and taking their land and resources little by little, we wouldn't be seeing the kind of violence against Israel that we do.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
June 30, 2010 at 9:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
jaysax and MacM make some very interesting points. As Americans, we tend to think that world history began roughly 200 years ago. But if we study slightly more distant history, we can certainly find instances of Muslim societies coexisting with Jews and other non-Muslim communities.
However, I don't think that it is fair to say that modern Muslim intolerance is a "direct result of occupation, colonization and oppressive dictators installed by western countries". These may be contributing factors in some circumstances. But it would be a terrible mistake to view Muslims as passive "victims" of Western culture. Such simplistic expressions of cause and effect are unhelpful and historically innaccurate - as much as Noam Chomsky might like you to believe otherwise.
Brett
blocker (anonymous profile)
June 30, 2010 at 10:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yes blocker, we should not simplify. There is no one-to-one relationship here as in anywhere else.
Having said that, the enormous U.S. funds, intelligence, and arms to Israel, where Israel as a government/country continues to ignore human rights violations, repeatedly objected to by European and other first-world nations, does contribute to the anger and unfortunately even facilitate legitimization of even illegitimate voices in third world countries against it.
Now and where we are:
- Israel should stop killings, imprisoning... which was the reason for its foundation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynWjYH...
- What Israel does is for Israel and Jewish people and therefore from their point of view logical. What is not understandable is why Americans put themselves in harm's way and support what they detest (violation of human rights...) allowing control of their foreign policies by Israel and its supporters (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOIkNE... ). There is no benefit to us Americans in such one-sided support of the state of Israel. Yes, if Israel is under serious threat we should support them but why are we supporting (providing weapons, which should only be used in defense and not offense and funding) their killings of civilians... One does not have to look too far - look at Flotilla, USS Liberty ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0q7yEn... ) to see the lies and arrogance and control of the media. Look at www.ifamericansknew.org , just do not expect Fox/ABC and other major news SHOWS controlled by Murdoch and other Zionist supporters to tell the truth. We live in great times thanks to YouTube and other portals and look forward to the day that major news media and U.S. politicians think of protecting America, American lives, and our children’s future and not their self well-beings and their foreign friends.
info (anonymous profile)
June 30, 2010 at 11:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)