The more things change, the more they stay the same. At 1 p.m. sharp today, the most well-known — and perhaps publically beloved — bit of real estate on the Gaviota Coast went to auction on the steps of the Santa Barbara County Courthouse.
Four minutes later, after nary a person amongst the several dozen in attendance dared enter a bid above the $50 million starting price for the wedge of coastal heaven known widely as Naples, the primary lender that made hopeful Naples conqueror Matt Osgood’s purchase of the land possible more than a decade ago, First Bank of Missouri, became the official owner. However, thanks to a last-minute deal brokered late last night between Osgood and the folks from First Bank, the Orange County-based developer will remain the primary shot-caller as the large-scale luxury home plan for Naples attempts to move forward.
According to Osgood — in an interview with The Independent just moments before the anticlimactic auction commenced — as per the deal signed last night, he will remain the lead manager of the 1,046-acre holding and the Santa Barbara County Supervisors’ approved (though currently stalled) plan to put 72 mansions and assorted outbuildings on the property. Additionally, Osgood reserves the right to once again purchase the land at a later date as well as have first refusal should another buyer emerge.
Though he acknowledged the risk in allowing the property to go to auction and ultimately default to the bank’s ownership, Osgood explained, “This really was the best possible business decision for us at this time … So much has changed [in real estate] since I first bought the property 12 years ago, this was a way for me to reduce the leverage on my investment.” Osgood also added that his deal with First Bank does indeed have a sunset date though he declined to say when exactly that was. Laughing, he opined, “I can’t let my opposition know that.”
Interestingly enough, while Osgood, at least in his opinion, and the many citizen-supported environmental groups that have worked tirelessly to oppose the long-stewing development plan can both claim victories of some sort today, the La Jolla-based Avalon Capital Group — which carried Osgood’s second and equally defaulted-upon loan on the property for some $18 million (the First Bank note was for $63 million, but with interest and missed payments currently amounts to roughly $78 million) — loses out entirely as a result of today’s plot twist with no real hope of recouping its money. “It is unfortunate,” said Osgood of Avalon’s loss, “but that is business.” The only way Osgood could have avoided today’s auction would have been to come up with $78 million in cash or declare bankruptcy.
Paul Wellman
Matt Osgood at the Santa Barbara County Courthouse moments before the Naples property auction
What exactly all this means for the fate of Naples remains unclear. Despite barely earning an approval from a previous incarnation of the County Supervisors in the fall of 2008, the project has gone nowhere in the time since. Relations between Osgood and a newly comprised Board of Supes have broken down since Doreen Farr replaced Brooks Firestone in the 3rd District seat, the Memorandum of Understanding between Osgood and the county that was helping guide the process has been terminated, and a required thumbs-up from the California Coastal Commission has not even had the hearing that would make it possible scheduled.
Asked if the writing was on the wall for him to eventually walk away from the deal, Osgood scoffed, “We still have a substantial amount of capital to keep playing in this deal … It is going to be a long haul.” Then, after regretfully explaining how he thinks the overall value of the property hasn’t changed much at all since he bought it despite earning a development approval nearly two years ago, Osgood added, “I will say, I never want to fall in love with a piece of property again.”



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
I love Matt's comments "It's Unfortunate" and "that's just business" to the $18M loss that Avalon Capital will take. Developers just play with other people's money and have no ethical restraint. However, I do fully understand Avalon probably stretched themselves too...so I guess they're all idiots! Go home OC.
Upper_State (anonymous profile)
May 13, 2010 at 4:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I second that motion, Go home OC.
All in favor, say I.
TheosOnTheNose (anonymous profile)
May 13, 2010 at 5:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow,
You people act as if Santa Barbara is not part of the USA or California???? Telling People to leave your county??? Maybe the people that have this attitude against Americans from different parts of the country should have the balls to go to war against the rest of America to keep us out of there??? Maybe succeed from the union. Total anti-American, snob ass attitude.
rennergizer (anonymous profile)
May 13, 2010 at 7:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Or maybe OC just sucks @__
loonpt (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 12:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Does one fall in love with a piece of property or fall in love with a unique coastal open space? That is the difference.
GiGi (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 4:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
LittleBigman
he will remain the lead manager
http://www.britposters.com/western.htm
easternpacific (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 6:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The "primary shot-callers" in this sad tale are the objectionista who seem unable to raise the money or convince the state to buy the property, but seem to have endless resources to tie this property up in litigation, aided by the schizophrenic Board of Supervisors, with whom a deal is never a deal.
This land will be developed eventually, once the concept of private property rights is recognized in the Peoples' Republic of Santa Barbara, enforced by federal courts if necessary. Osgood proposed a plan that would have severely limited long-term development of this beautiful area while providing beach access to the public and ensuring it would not become another Newport Beach , but the objectionista are so unable to compromise and so consumed by their prejudice and hatred of what they see as a "greedydeveloper from OC", that they let a golden oppportunity slip by. Foolish, foolish, foolish...
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 9:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
JohnLocke, you predictive powers are suspect; remember this from a few days back (before the auction)?
http://www.independent.com/news/2010/...
What happened?
And you're severely numbers-challenged here:
http://www.independent.com/news/2010/...
http://www.independent.com/news/2010/...
Chester_Arthur_Burnett (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 10:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
On your first, I was simply repeating what had been published in three local sources a week or so ago. And read this article carefully, Osgood has already arranged funding.
And on the second, you apparently missed my retraction.
But do you have anything constructive to offer?
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 12:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Oops, my mistake, he's just still in charge while using Other Peoples' Money and has right of first refusal to repurchase. A distinction without a difference.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 12:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
JL,
Right of first refusal would assume that Osbad could come up with the money that he can't come up with today...Would you loan him another $18M?
What do you bet that the $18M lost was hedged by CDO derivitives written by AIG and payed for by the US taxpayer? That's just business... as the pirates say.
What do these all have in common?:
La Entrada
The Miramar
Daniel Boone's hostel
the Goleta industrial park turned condo village
Chapala 1
Goleta Marriot Inn
Glen Annie Golf course and surrounding area
$5M subsidy by COG for Sumida apartments
Naples
Answer: The developer overpaid for the raw land and then cries economic neccessity to overbuild on the land to maximize their own profits while the community suffers ever after for their bad deals.
Notice it's always the "smartest guys in the room" who screwup big time than continue to insist they are worth millions a year in compensation for their brilliance?
sa1 (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 4:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think the picture of him looks funny, it looks like he's being arraigned in a courtroom. It should read "Here is Matt Osgood entering a not guilty plea. He will be back in court on May 20th to face further charges".
sixdolphins (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 6:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The second picture of him however looks quite ordinary and nondescript, just like my second post on this blog.
sixdolphins (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2010 at 6:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
sa1: your comment "Notice it's always the "smartest guys in the room" who screwup big time than continue to insist they are worth millions a year in compensation for their brilliance?" is notable in that it only focusses on the newsmakers.
There is also a huge group of "ordinary citizens" who lied on their mortgage applications in order to overpay for and mortgage a home they couldn't afford, then wailing about not understanding what they signed and their inability to pay, and expecting a taxpayer bailout. Be fair, now, it's just a matter of scale.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
May 15, 2010 at 9:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Who is First Bank of Missouri and why in the world would they be speculating on the Gaviota Coast ranch land using SoCal developers? Now there is a story worth investigating. How did midwestern pension funders (or whoever) end up holding the bag on an impossible dream to plunk down mansions on some of the last California coastal open space left? Someone should have warned these folks that they were being scammed.
4Oceans (anonymous profile)
May 15, 2010 at 9:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"A lie is not a lie if the truth is not expected."
-Mortgage Broker motto-
sa1 (anonymous profile)
May 16, 2010 at 7:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
First Bank has branches in Santa Barbara and Santa Ynez. The principal owner of the bank happens to be a gentleman from Missouri who, due to his love for, and investment in, wine making, has a significant presence in the Santa Ynez/Lompoc region. He also has a home in the area. The bank has several loans in the area as a result of his personal interest in SB County...
There is always a story. There is always a reason. And it doesnt have to be an evil plot or conspiracy.
And, for the "Yankee from OC, Go Home" crowd....it would be enlightening if you researched the home, office,shop or open space in which you find yourself this very minute to see who developed, built or owns this for your present comfort and enjoyment. Our beautiful town didn't hatch from an egg, fully grown and ready for you. The trail includes many men and women of vision...few of them were native Santa Barbarans.
60Hotel (anonymous profile)
May 17, 2010 at 8:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It appears a few of you understand capitalism. The ones that clearly do not understand the term, also appear to have something against Americans that are not from their elitist, snob, socialist group in Santa Barbara. They are too stupid to realize capital comes to Santa Barbara from all over the world to make it a better place. I challenge these idiots to start wearing T-Shirts that state "We are against any money coming to Santa Barbara if your not from here". That is an intelligent economic policy. Those same idiots should wear a T-Shirt that says "We hate Americans who are not from Santa Barbara". The reason you wont, is clearly you will get you ass kicked!!! Elitist Snobs that hate Americans. SAD!!!!!
rennergizer (anonymous profile)
May 18, 2010 at 6:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The issue here is not anti-Americanism or Santa Barbara elitism. Those comments sound ignorant and detract from the real issue...
This is about protecting one of the last pristine coastal areas in Southern California. Part of what makes Goleta so beautiful is that there are still relatively pristine beaches and coastal areas. It's a shame that just a few people with a lot of money can ruin what so many enjoy.
macsurf (anonymous profile)
May 18, 2010 at 11:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks goodness for the Save Naples coalition and all the good, decent people who have tried to save a piece of the last reasonably intact section of pristine coastland south of San Simeon, but their group is far from socialist. Frankly, I think they have been more than generous by not revealing the full truth about the unbridled greed and destructiveness of developers along the California coast, this being NOT a "liberal" state at all but rather the most developer-friendly, developer-OWNED government of either coast. SoCal is running out of drinkable water, out of energy -- be it clean or dirty -- and its beaches and air quality are becoming more polluted instead of less, and yet --- with an ineffective and developer-controlled Coastal Commission --- the tens of millions of good-decent WORKING people here have no real say in the future of our coastline.
Matt Osgood -- and his like-minded friends in government --- have been very successful at restricting this to a "local" issue. Well this coastline is a resource of STATE importance, and a NATIONAL resource, and it is time that the people of the STATE and the NATION be invited to provide some REAL input on this rape of its last surviving beaches. We have only to look to the Gulf of Mexico to see what our right-wing, pro-business friends have allowed to happen there. Frankly, MY ancestors fought a revolution to END the control of America by cheap-labor Feudalist-types like Matt Osgood, Jalama Ranch, and the Hearst family, to name a few. It is time that the Federal Government TAKE this land (with all of the over-compensating the government always makes to owners using their ridiculous inflated values that scumbags like Osgood always insist their property is worth) and MAKE IT THE NATIONAL SEASHORE IT SHOULD BE!
HumanDecency (anonymous profile)
May 18, 2010 at 3:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
California... Looking like a third world nation every day. The dream is dead. You are living in the past like the British and the French.
Goleta_Minnesota (anonymous profile)
May 19, 2010 at 10:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks Hotel for the info. on First Missouri bank. However, if you're correct that FM Bank is just one midwest 'gentleman' who loves SB then the question is why in the world would he speculate to the tune of nearly $100 million in order to pave and develop one of the area's most treasured natural environments? If you call that 'appreciation' for the area, I call it something much different.
4Oceans (anonymous profile)
May 20, 2010 at 12:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Stay Tuned. There is a Lot More to this story. Its kind of like a never ending story. Will the courts come into play?????
rennergizer (anonymous profile)
July 13, 2010 at 2:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)