Sally Kingston, principal of Harding University Partnership School, said, “I cried the entire day,” when the Westside elementary school’s Academic Performance Index (API) score was released. That score reflected a 57-point increase from 687 to 744. (800 is considered proficient.) According to her, only 155 schools out of more than 5,000 in the state of California increased their scores by 50-plus points.
She dedicated Friday afternoon to celebrating that success with a “STAR Celebration” (named for the Standardized Testing and Reporting exams, which make up elementary school API scores) including student and teacher performances as well as drop-ins by high-profile visitors such as the entire school board and Santa Barbara Unified School District Superintendent Dave Cash.
Kingston was convinced that the educational environment at Harding had already improved greatly by last year, but said the entire faculty was “organizationally depressed” when their students’ scores did not reflect their increased learning. Adding to the depression was the fact that two other area elementary schools — McKinley and Franklin — showed marked improvement. McKinley was only the second South Coast school (besides Isla Vista Elementary) to have dug itself out of Program Improvement (PI), a status garnered by two consecutive years below Adequate Yearly Performance (AYP).
After four years in PI, a school must undertake one of four prescribed reforms, which Harding did in the shape of a complete redesign. It has partnered with UCSB’s Gevirtz School of Education to become a veritable living experiment in educational innovation. The number of initiatives and reforms going on at the school are so mind-dizzyingly various that it’s hard to nail down what, exactly, accounts for the drastic improvement in Harding’s students’ scores.
Dr. Jane Conoley, dean of the Gevirtz School, breaks down the contributors into four categories. First, and possibly most simply, is that teachers made a concerted effort to focus on test-taking skills, starting with basic tasks such as filling in bubble sheets. They also explained to students the importance of the tests, and fired up their competitive juices by challenging them to increase their scores.
After the STAR celebration ended, a group of 6th-grade girls reflected on the tools that helped them improve their results. Wendy, an aspiring teacher, said she learned to “underline key words” in test questions. Anna, a future pediatrician, said, “I was reading, reading, reading during the summer.” Saraji and her friend Stephanie, who hope to be cosmetologists and/or teachers, explained the “ridiculous strategy,” in which patently wrong answers are removed from multiple-choice options.
The second contributor to Harding’s success, said Conoley, is the implementation of an International Baccalaureate (IB) program. Superintendent David Cash seconded the value of IB, which, among other goals, emphasizes a global perspective, student inquiry, and the teaching of a second language. Cash introduced an IB “school-within-a-school” to Dos Pueblos High School when he was the principal there. He said its three greatest strengths are focuses on critical thinking, interdisciplinary studies, and the whole child.
In an IB classroom, students are encouraged to explore subjects on their own and to ask questions. “It’s not just teaching to the test,” said Dr. William Copeland, a 40-year veteran education professor at UCSB and a member of the Harding advisory committee. He stressed that the new curriculum was not a one-size-fits-all approach that can be imported from one school to the next. “It doesn’t come in a box,” he said. “What it means is invented at each school site differently according to the needs of that site.”
Jennifer Lindsay, a 6th-grade teacher who has helped rewrite the school’s curriculum, said changes started making their way into the classroom about three years ago. She offered the example of an economics and trading unit in which 4th graders opened up their own store — called Kidsmart — and sold school supplies and other knickknacks like bracelets. They donated their profits to the Make-A-Wish Foundation. Harding officially became an IB candidate school last year and is applying for full certification this year.
Conoley credits professional development in math and science as the third element of Harding’s success. For instance, Bill Jacobs, a math instructor at UCSB, runs a summer program for both teachers and “preprofessional” student-teachers. (He also holds a math camp for students.)
The final piece of the puzzle, according to Conoley, is the contribution of UCSB students. Between undergrads who tutor special-needs children in literacy, graduate student-teachers, and PhD candidates, the Harding campus is swarming with young eager beavers, “making sure that not one single child falls through the cracks,” said Assistant Superintendent Robin Sawaske. Copeland compares Harding to a teaching hospital.
The partnership with UCSB, however, has enabled the school to educate parents as well as students. Collie Conoley, Jane’s husband and also an education professor, has instituted a Family Strength Center with two of his doctoral students, Nelly Gonzalez and Marla Pontrelli. They offer coaching sessions for guardians who wish to improve their parenting.
“Typically, parents who are poor [and 90 percent of Harding’s students come from economically disadvantaged families] use avoidant goals,” said Conoley. “They focus on what they don’t want to have happen.” That is because in their own daily lives they are worrying about what could go wrong: losing a job, not having enough to eat, running out of money.
The coaching — which, according to Collie Conoley, yields observable results after four sessions — encourages parents to “focus on what they do enjoy about their family and what they want for their children.”
It is important to cultivate these habits while children are still young because adolescents listen to their peers as opposed to authority figures. To that end, Harding, in partnership with Westside Thrive — a coalition of area foundations targeting children from birth to age five — is reaching out to neighborhood children before they even get to elementary school. Their campus hosts four preschool classes in order to adequately prepare students for kindergarten and offers workshops for new parents as well.
So far, the numbers suggest that the reforms at Harding have made the biggest impact on its younger students. The strongest test scores were achieved by 2nd, 3rd, and 4th graders. Susan Rakov, the mother of a 4th grader at Harding and a 7th grader who attended Harding, noted, “You can see that the kids who only had Sally [Kingston as their principal] made huge leaps.”
While this year’s batch of test scores can be read as an affirmation of student success, their greatest significance may lie in helping to erase Harding’s hard-to-shake image as a poor-performing school victimized by white flight. According to Copeland, Harding’s biggest challenge is overcoming negative perceptions in the community of a school populated by Spanish-speaking immigrants with no traditional ideals of achievement or community participation.
Poor test scores only reinforce those perceptions. “A lot of people make assumptions based on test scores,” said Cathi Speake, mother of two students at Harding and a teacher herself at La Colina Junior High School.
Such assumptions, said Kingston, often feed preconceived prejudices, referring to Harding’s largely Latino population. “I worry that in our community some people feel like they belong more than others.” That is an attitude she hopes to change.
How to accurately assess the learning that takes place in a classroom is a subject for academic discussion, but, like it or not, standardized test scores are the most visible signifier of a school’s success, one that parents often use to judge the schools they consider sending their children to.
To those parents who have already bought into Harding, the scores justify their decision and give them hope that other Westside families will follow suit. “People need to want to go to a school,” said Brian Robinson, father of a kindergartner and president of the Harding School Foundation. Test scores give them something concrete to hang onto.
“For me,” said Kingston, “it’s a public affirmation of what I see every day.”
Copeland agrees that whatever the negative perceptions of Harding may be, they are not what he sees either. “Go to a parents meeting and see for yourself. They come in force from all around the neighborhood, pushing strollers. They sit down and they participate. They ask lots of questions. They are very eager.”
Harding is beginning to look like a place that fosters community, as opposed to scaring members of the community away. Dr. Kingston’s greatest asset may be her ability to shepherd resources, human and otherwise, for the common goal of educating children. By the number of adults who turned out to celebrate Harding’s improved API score — including UCSB faculty and students, parents, school district officials, and representatives from nonprofits — it was clear that Harding’s ascent has been aided greatly by a community effort. When it comes to bringing that community together, said Cash, “Sally’s just such a perfect principal.”
Related Links
- Harding School Revamps, Restructures, and Re-imagines its Future [ June 4, 2009 ]
- Harding School’s New Cafeteria Program [ September 13, 2007 ]



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace







Previous Month



Comments
Good job Harding! I hope that this sucess will encourage more of the non-hispanic families in the neighborhood to enroll their children at Harding so it will be a more diverse campus. That will also help test scores because language is a factor. Harding has some amazing programs for parents in the neighborhood to help them to learn English and to understand the importance of their children doing homework, reading and focusing on building themselves a positive future with a strong education.
Harding, knowing that a lot of their population is from below poverty households and have gang influences outside of school, has programs to prevent gang attitudes also. I think that is a really positive thing that they do. My children are not hispanic but we live in the neighborhood and after years of them attending school out of our district we enrolled them in Harding. They were thrilled with the food (homemade daily and local fruit & veggies plus things from the school garden) and they really enjoy the cultural things Harding provides. It would be great to see the school become more diverse and I hope that neighborhood parents step up and make that happen!
santabarbarasand (anonymous profile)
September 3, 2011 at 1:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Those assumptions, said Kingston, often feed pre-conceived prejudices, referring to Harding’s largely Latino population. “I worry that in our community some people feel like they belong more than others.”
This kind of Anglo-baiting snark does little to convince non-Latino parents to send their kids to Harding. It is the Mexican illegal immigrants who are telling "whites" to go back to Europe.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07...
revisionist (anonymous profile)
September 3, 2011 at 1:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Congrats to Harding - Santa Barbara seems to perpetually be on the up-and-up.
montSQ (anonymous profile)
September 3, 2011 at 5:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
revisionist, I agree... my son gets picked on quite a bit at that school for being white and if he was younger I would not have him there because of that. However, if more white famiies enroll their kids there will be more balance and it would be good since there are actually a lot of white families in the neighborhood. Why is it that they are putting their kids into schools in wealthier neighborhoods just so that their kids can go to schools that are more predominately whilte? It perpetuates the problem when you snub a school that is in your neighborhood.
santabarbarasand (anonymous profile)
September 3, 2011 at 5:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Santabarbarasand, while I almost always agree with you, this time I strongly disagree with you.
I don't have children, but if they are being harassed because of their race at their school, then I wouldn't think twice about pulling them out of that school (where clearly the teachers are creating or condoning an environment where such attitudes are allowed to flourish) and putting them in a place where they can learn and not have to be terrorized.
I would also submit that there may well be Mexican and Black parents who also have chosen to place their children in schools in wealthier neighborhoods because the issue that nobody in the political sphere dares to discuss is that fact that if you are Mexican and/or Black and you strive academically you are at best ostracized for "acting white".
Simply loading up a predominantly Mexican school with more white kids is not the answer; digging to the root of the cause of why the racism you speak is acceptable is the only way to solve the problem and clearly these kids are learning it somewhere.
I know of what I speak: I went to Santa Barbara High School and I too experienced what your son is going through. Moreover, my closest friend (who I met there and is of Mexican descent) got it both ways: he had white kids who didn't like him because he was Mexican and Mexican kids didn't like him because he didn't emulate the mob mentality and dared to have intellectual interests.
Overall as a culture we haven't come very far have we?
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 5, 2011 at 2:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Having said all this, if Harding is turning out good results, more power to them.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 2:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I don't know why people are surprised when scores in public schools go up. That's the only way they can go.
waz (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 9:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Also, I don't know what all the celebrating is about. Isn't this what's supposed to happen in school? The teachers teach. The kids learn. The kids are tested. The test results should show that the kids learned what the teachers taught. The fact that it comes as a surprise to everyone makes me especially glad that I send my kids to private school.
waz (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 9:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
And, wait a minute. I just reread that first part again.
"That score reflected a one-year, 57-point increase from 687 to 744. (Eight hundred is considered proficient.)"
They're celebrating the fact that they're below proficiency? Even if they had another 57-point increase next year, they would only be 1 point above the minimum score to be considered proficient. Wow! Get out the party favors!
waz (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 9:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Waz is the kind of knuckle-head Parent or Boss you hope you never have (or encounter): quick-to-judge, infectiously mean, and hopelessly satisfied to wallow in his own crabby opinions.
Yes, Harding has not reached proficiency targets.
But why would you condemn, rather than cheer, a dramatic improvement in performance for a perpetually low-performing school? Of course the answer is you insist on making political points reflecting your righteously-right viewpoints, context or facts be damned.
Visit this link, and see the demographic and background information on these families and kids. For example:
- - English learners: ... 82%
- - Parent Education Level (%):
... ... Not a high school graduate ... 57
... ... High school graduate ... 27
... ... Some college ... 10
... ... College graduate ... 5
... ... Graduate school ... 1
http://api.cde.ca.gov/Acnt2011/2011Gr...
I often hear my right-wing colleagues lamenting the lack of accountability these days, and laying great claim to nose-to-the-grindstone bootstrapping, the joys of lifting yourself out of your circumstance, beyond expectations.
Here we have it.
Catch someone doing something right: in this case, keep up the good work Harding!
Chester_Arthur_Burnett (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 10:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Always good news.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 12:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey Chester_Arthur_Burnett! I did the job I was expected to do today! I think I'll alert the media, buy a bunch of balloons, take time out of my busy day, and have a celebration instead of doing what I'm supposed to be doing!
"Waz is the kind of knuckle-head Parent or Boss you hope you never have (or encounter)"???
What do you know? As far as parenting goes? I put my kids in private schools so that they won't have to celebrate the fact that they're less than proficient. What about you? I value my children's education. I don't want them to settle for something less than proficient. I want them to excel in their education. What about you? Or would you keep your kid in such a school because "you insist on making political points reflecting your righteously-LEFT viewpoints"?
waz (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 5:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
waz....time to get a clue and probably get in to some classrooms. Times have changed, volunteer and see what the expectations are from preschool through 12th. Then rethink your comments.
jr490 (anonymous profile)
September 7, 2011 at 9:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
jr490...Time to work on your reading comprehension skills. At my kid's school, I have to volunteer many times throughout the year. That's what is required and expected of us as parents where my kids go to school. So, know what you're talking about before you make any assumptions about what I do, and don't do. And, times have changed? Really? That's the problem. We used to expect more out of our teachers and students. Now, we settle for less than adequate performance, and justify it by saying that the times, they are a changing. What exactly is that supposed to mean anyway? We've lowered our standards, and that's okay? Public schools, especially in California are turning out less than proficient (much less) graduates at an alarming rate. They can hardly read, write or do math, and their knowledge of science and history is practically nil. Yet, here we are, celebrating less than proficient test scores like we never had any expectation that they would ever rise to begin with. I guess that's just the new mindset in these changing times. Maybe Harding can make bumper stickers to hand out to the parents that say,"PROUD PARENT OF AN ALMOST PROFICIENT STUDENT".
waz (anonymous profile)
September 8, 2011 at 7:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@waz
"I put my kids in private schools so that they won't have to celebrate the fact that they're less than proficient."
I actually know what you meant by this, but I still think it's funny. . . .
equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
September 8, 2011 at 10:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I guess I'm stuck with you as my official spelling/syntax checker. Have you ever considered becoming a stalker?
waz (anonymous profile)
September 8, 2011 at 11:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)