Paul Wellman
Labor union protesters hold a banner on the 1100 block on State Street. They did not want their photo taken and would not give their names. (Feb. 10, 2012 )
Labor Union Plays the Blame Game
Bannering Targets Scratch Their Heads in Confusion
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
They’re hard to miss: nearly a dozen 20-foot-long banners staked throughout Santa Barbara and Goleta emblazoned with big red letters that spell “SHAME ON [insert name here].” And the issue, on the surface, is easy to understand: bad blood between a local carpenters union and Goleta Valley Cottage Hospital over a lost contract. But how and why the union chose the people it’s targeting, and what exactly it hopes to accomplish with the ongoing public protests, is much less clear.
Carpenters Local 150 started bannering Goleta Hospital Foundation trustees last month — in front of their regular places of business — claiming the hospital, its Board of Trustees, and its main contractor should be faulted for hiring nonunion subcontractors from outside the area. (Goleta Valley Cottage Hospital is currently undergoing a massive renovation and rebuild. Construction crews broke ground in March 2010 and the work, which has a price tag of $103 million, should be completed by summer 2012. The trustees meet together once a quarter, and each spends a few hours a month working during off time to raise money for that project and others.)
Local 150 — based in Camarillo with around 1,500 members — says it has a labor dispute with the company chosen to do the hospital’s metal framing and drywall. The union claims its nonunion competitor — C.A. Hofmann Construction, Inc. in Loma Alta — pays its employees unfairly low wages, doesn’t provide health care, and generally contributes to what Local 150 calls the “erosion of standards for local workers.”
C.A. Hofmann declined to be interviewed for this story. “We don’t have a dispute with anyone,” said a representative before hanging up. Indeed, there hasn’t been a formal complaint against the company filed with the National Labor Relations Board. No one from Local 150 could be reached for comment. Numerous messages left over the last few weeks with chapter president Joseph Duran and others have gone unreturned, as were messages left with the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters, which officially oversees Local 150.
The little that’s known about the purported dispute is what’s included on a flier handed out by the banner holders, people unaffiliated with the union and hired through the Rescue Mission or Salvation Army for $8 to $10 per hour. Though generally pleasant, they appear to have little or no knowledge of the issue, wordlessly passing out the fliers which feature a rat nibbling on an American flag below the headline “SHAME ON [person’s name] For Desecration of the American Way of Life.” They set up the signs four to five days a week, except when it rains, and shake their heads when asked if they have their own union. Local 150 has used this strategy since at least 2004, bannering up and down Southern California when it loses a contracting bid. It’s not known how long the union plans to stake out the trustees here in Santa Barbara County, but they can sometimes hold their ground for months.
By Paul Wellman
Leonard Perez, a retired journeyman, (left) and another labor union protester (who declined to give her name) hold a banner on the corner of State and Figueroa streets. (Feb. 10, 2012 )
Cottage Hospital and the trustees have voiced tempered exasperation at Local 150’s method of attracting attention. Cottage spokesperson Janet O’Neill said the Goleta hospital and its foundation have little to do with hiring subcontractors. That duty was given by Cottage Health System to the project’s general contractor — HBE Corp. — which is specifically directed to take offers from local companies as it considers competitive bids from elsewhere in the state and beyond. There’s no union agreement in place. The goal, O’Neill said, is to get the project done in an efficient, cost-effective manner, explaining seven out of the 29 subcontractors hired thus far are based in the tri-counties. Cottage’s Goleta and Santa Barbara campuses, in response to bannering outside of both, have posted statements in the entryways outlining the situation. HBE representatives didn’t return calls for comment.
“[Local 150’s] angle is pretty despicable,” said board chair Jeffrey Bermant, explaining he and the rest of the trustees aren’t involved in choosing subcontractors. “We have absolutely no say in how the hospital is built. … They seem pretty removed from reality.” Local 150 erected a banner outside Bermant Development Company on Hollister Avenue last month, only communicating with Bermant, he said, after he called the union’s headquarters to ask what was going on.
A representative claimed the union sent Bermant a letter six months earlier detailing the dispute. Bermant responded that he never got one and said he would’ve passed it to hospital administrators if he had. He argued that the trustees are only tasked with raising money and have no power over policy. The rep, Bermant said, explained the union was targeting trustees to get the attention of the hospital’s higher-ups. Speaking to The Santa Barbara Independent, Bermant was quick to point out that he supports the union’s right to banner, that he understands the value of free speech. Its focus and energy, however, is misplaced, he said.
Joanne Funari, Businesses First Bank president and a new member of the foundation’s board, watched a “shame” banner go up in front of her office on the corner of State and Figueroa streets last month. “I’m just a volunteer trying to raise money,” she said, similarly confused why Local 150 would call her out. Funari said she was never contacted by the union and doesn’t understand what it hopes to accomplish by going after her and the other trustees. But, she said, “There’s nothing I can do about it. Everybody has the right to freedom of speech.”
Courtesy
Employees of Robert B. Locke Law Offices, upset at Local 150’s recently installed banner, create a sign of their own
Trustee Robert B. Locke, whose Goleta law firm is bannered, passed along similar sentiments. He also noted that the signs, at first glance, suggest the holders were fired by the person named on it or that there is some internal conflict within the business it sits in front of. “That I took offense to,” he said. His secretaries, happy employees of Robert B. Locke Law Offices, made their own banner that’s now placed on the sidewalk next to Local 150’s. It reads: “Shame on Joe Durand and Local 150 for Harassing Volunteers of Nonprofits.” They created and dispersed competing fliers in defense of their boss as well. Locke said he’s tried to get in touch with Durand many times without any luck.
A number of complaints have been filed in recent years with the National Labor Relations Board against the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters. All were specific to the strategy of bannering third-party, neutral businesses or employers in a passive effort to get them to stop working with a target company. The NLRB, however, ruled in each instance that the carpenters unions weren’t picketing (meaning they weren’t being confrontational or actively trying to convince employees to not work at job sites) and therefore not in violation of the National Labor Relations Act. The most recent ruling was handed down in April 2011.
Comments
Why would anyone oppose a non-union firm hiring aliens and paying them low wages with no benefits?
That is as crazy as loud helicopter operations in a residential neighborhood!
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2012 at 5:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
John, if your loved one needs timely emergency treatment, we'll send a taxi.
Botany (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2012 at 8:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I have no problems with unions expressing their greivances, but do it above board. Union members should do the picketing and not hire day laborers (with low pay and no benefits) to do the job for them. They should take responsibility for their actions as well, which they seem to be adamantly against doing.
Botany (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2012 at 8:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Unions not playing fair? Say it ain't so!
For the unions and demokrat party (but i repeat myself) the ends justify the means.
As long as we are talking shared sacrifice, it is high time that unions start to be taxed like everything else. Like President 0bama says everyone should have skin in the game and the unions do not.
jukin (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2012 at 9:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The Union should be picketed for not giving health care to its picketers, obviously they are contributing "to the erosion of standards for local workers".
pointssouth (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2012 at 9:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I, too, find it curious that a union, angry with local business for not hiring unionized labor that "pays its employees unfairly low wages, doesn’t provide healthcare, and generally contributes ... to the 'erosion of standards for local workers'", would turn right around hire day laborers with no benefits and a non-living wage to picket for them. Isn't that the pot???
It's time we all realize that unions have long outlived their usefullness. When working conditions evolved from appalling conditions and excessive work hours to apathy and excessive wages, it was time for the unions to go. Now they serve to extort dues out of the members, provide "collective bargaining" in their own self-interests, and pay day laborers to hold signs when they don't get their way.
sbdude (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2012 at 10:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Shame = salaries of many union brass. Shame = employees being forced to pay union fees in states with the bogus "Right to Work" laws that Dems in power love to enact, thereby continuing the cozy but toxic Dem-Labor cycle. Shame = paid protesters who aren't even union, and who don't even know what they're protesting. At least that guy dressed in the big pizza slice costume knows he is trying to sell you sausage and pepperoni. Ask one of these union "shame" knuckleheads what's going on and they give you the dumb and dumber look.
Scooter (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2012 at 10:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Where's Michael Moore when you need him? Oh yeah, being the hypocritical 1%er that he is while claiming he's the 99%.
This ain't about the union members, it's about the union's "business agents" & their greed which is quenched through higher union dues levied on the union's members.
When they say "Live better, work union" we know who the "better" portion applies to: Business agents.
Been there AFL-CIO Carpenter's & Joiners Union, local 727, Hialeah, FL), done that, over it like a bad cold, never again :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2012 at 12:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The way to end the noisy helicopter operations at Cottage Hospital is to end unions, because then no one would have health insurance that would pay for the helicopters.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2012 at 1:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
A little off topic, but did Cottage, owner of Goleta Valley Hospital, hire local union workers for their massive retrofit/remodel?
I know they hired electricians from Palmdale, which seems pretty odd.
14noscams (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2012 at 3:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
John_A: "The way to end the noisy helicopter operations at Cottage Hospital is to end unions, because then no one would have health insurance that would pay for the helicopters."
Sorry to bum your high there little fella, but I ain't union & got insurance that'll pay for a copter ride to Cottage.
In fact, LOTS of people aren't union & do have insurance so that "argument" goes out the copter's window & splat on the ground below.
Oh, that's right, if you're union you get "free" insurance! Yeah, that's the ticket.
Oops, wait, no such thing as "free" insurance, that's what union dues go to pay for (when not being used in a political campaign that most members don't support).
Just try to use that union provided insurance, you're lucky to get a band-aid w/ the dismal coverage it provides.
So yeah, I guess being non-union & insured is a myth perpetuated by the "gimme, gimme, gimme" crowd.
You can get all the "gimme" you want, but in all reality somebody's paying for it, chances are it's you :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2012 at 8:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Interesting the Independent isn't the only local publication who had taken a critical look at them, this article from the Santa Maria Sun..
http://www.santamariasun.com/cover/41...
pointssouth (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2012 at 8:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
And one of their targets getting support from other unions as the San Luis Obispo paper reports
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/2010/02/...
pointssouth (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2012 at 8:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
In one specific case in Goleta this "rent a protest" group is picketing an guy that has been gone for at least two years.
I am pleased however that the union is contributing to below living wage remuneration levels without benefits, for local workers...?
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
February 15, 2012 at 6:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What are the names of the ALL the contraactors doing the remodel at Cottage Hospital? S.B. unions seem to have a shortage of people available to DO this work, or their union contractors could not compete in the bidding process. Where I come from we (union members) VOLUNTEER to walk the big ticket construction/remodel contract picketed jobs in solidarity.
It's not about greedy unions it's about unfair working conditions and untrained low paid un-qualified people doing the actual work on those buildings. It's about quality of life for skilled labor, and fairness & equality in employment.
Hello! Do you want your hospital where you take your children to be built by an unlicensed electrician, plumber ceiling person etc.?
Is it OK with you if the people that built your mother's hospital do not earn a living wage, have any medical coverage, receive travel time for out-of-town jobs? I didn't think so.
Sooz58 (anonymous profile)
February 15, 2012 at 8:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Nothing wrong with using non-union labor. Being a union member is no guarantee of skill. That is a long-discredited myth.
The only skill unions have is shake-down harassment of legitimate businesses. So no, I don't want building built by union shake-down artists. I want buildings built by those who want to work and honor the privilege of getting the job.
Santa Barbara is too small a town to shame this group of people who are too well known and already highly regarded in this town. Unions today are their own worst enemies.
Oblati (anonymous profile)
February 15, 2012 at 9:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I find it funny that instead of the union paying their employees they're wasting money on stupid banners that no one pays attention too. For those who are against employers hiring non-union workers let me ask you this, If you saw the same expensive brand jacked that you just loved cheaper at a different store would you buy the jacket that was pricier or the one that was cheaper? Think about that way. Instead of wasting your time holding a banner go look for a job.
e1986gonzalez (anonymous profile)
February 15, 2012 at 3:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Can't afford union workers? Well, they COULD drop their rates - that's what a marketplace is for. OR they could whine and moan and look to their pet, paid-for politicians to dream up some demonstrably counter-freedom law to require they be hired. I don't think the general public has much sympathy for the unions these days.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
February 15, 2012 at 10:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Union-supporting and union-bashing aside, the other shoe of scandal is that only seven of 29 sub-contractors hired so far are "based in the Tri Counties," according to Cottage's spokesperson. I wonder how many of those seven are based on the South Coast, or even anywhere in Santa Barbara County.
And I do agree that you get what you pay for; somebody trucking in here from far away, with no stake in the community and the job's quality, working for less money than local workers, is less likely to perform capable work. This is no way to run any type of responsible business, especially one that loudly purports to pride itself as being a community asset. Shame on the all-holy Cottage Health Systems and its oft-praised leaders!
GregMohr (anonymous profile)
February 17, 2012 at 12:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)