• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Michelle J. Wong

    Lt. Gen. Henry “Trey” Obering addresses an audience at the dedication of the Ronald W. Reagan missile defense site at Vandenberg Air Force Base.


    Costly Missile Defense System Dedicated at AFB

    Vandenberg Hosts Star Wars


    Thursday, April 3, 2008
    By Ben Preston (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Amid the pomp of a military band, Lt. General Henry “Trey” Obering — director of the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) — dedicated the Missile Defense Site at Vandenberg Air Force Base last Thursday to former president Ronald Reagan, who initiated the current worldwide intercontinental ballistic missile defense system. Obering stated that long-range plans for his agency’s program include the possibility of additional ground-based midcourse defense (GMD) interceptor missile sites — similar to the 21 at Ft. Greely, Alaska, and the three at Vandenberg — in Poland and the Czech Republic. President George W. Bush is currently traveling through Europe to promote the plan prior to this week’s NATO summit in Bucharest, Romania.

    Obering and Representative Trent Franks (R-Arizona) — a member of the House Armed Services Committee who also spoke at the dedication — praised the movement started by Reagan’s historic “Star Wars” speech in March 1983, in which he laid out the tenets of his Strategic Defense Initiative, favoring the deterrent properties of an effective defensive missile system over the doctrine of mutual assured destruction — or nuclear arms race — in place at the time. “Today, it is appropriate that we name this missile defense system in honor of a man whose visionary leadership … made it all possible,” said Obering of Reagan. “His wisdom is even more evident today. We hope to see a day when missile defense has made ballistic missiles obsolete as delivery for weapons of mass destruction.”

    Since its inception in 2002, the Missile Defense Agency has put into practice the ideals laid out by the Strategic Defense Initiative, by deploying the current 24 GMDs — which are operated by the Army National Guard’s 100th Missile Defense Brigade — in conjunction with the U.S. Navy’s Aegis guided missile cruisers, unit-based interceptors located throughout the world, and a complex network of radar stations. One other GMD is planned for installation at Vandenberg in addition to 10 more that the MDA wishes to place in central Europe.

    “We have spent billions of dollars on this program and have little to show for it.” - Representative Lois Capps

    Although Obering and other supporters say that the system has been effective in “test after test after test,” others view it skeptically. “We have spent billions of dollars on this program and have little to show for it,” said Representative Lois Capps. “I’m very concerned that other priorities — like supporting our men and women in uniform and caring for wounded veterans — will get squeezed because of all the money we’re spending on expensive, unproven programs like missile defense.” Analyses by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office show that close to $100 billion has been spent on missile defense since 1993, with projected annual costs increasing to nearly $20 billion by 2015. President Bush tagged $10.4 billion for missile defense in his budget request for 2009, according to the Office of Management and Budget Web site.

    Dennis Apel, a peace activist who has held regular vigils outside Vandenberg’s gates for the past 12 years, maintains that the Bush administration’s push to station GMDs in central Europe will be seen by Russia as an offensive move. “We still don’t want missiles in Cuba,” he said, “but we’ve got no problem putting them in Poland, right next to Russia.” This is a view shared by Philip Coyle, a senior advisor at the Center for Defense Information who served as assistant secretary of defense from 1994 to 2001. “This divides NATO,” he said. “Poland, in return for allowing missile defense sites, wants help strengthening its conventional military.” Coyle also noted the low rate of success in tests of the system, saying that the computers driving it are not always able to distinguish enemy missiles from friendly aircraft, as occurred with the Patriot missile system — a component of MDA’s program — during the Gulf War. “There have been 13 flight intercept tests [with GMDs] at Vandenberg and Greely over the past decade, and seven have been successful. Of the six failures, two of the interceptors never even left the ground.”

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    How appropriate to name this incredible boodoggle of an installation with the name of a president who thought his term in the oval office was one long movie location.

    The only thing this will accomplish (besides making the usual defense contractors overwhelmingly rich) is to guarantee that every major nuclear power will set Vandenberg as the number one prime target for their launch force ICBMs - if it wasn't already.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    SamRedDog (anonymous profile)
    April 3, 2008 at 8:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    62.1°
    Wind:
    6 SSE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • Within the Syuxtun Story Circle
    • Camellia Sasanqua
    • Whole New Ballgame
    • Gratuitous Gore on Highway 154
    • Saul Williams Brings Afro-Punk Tour to Velvet Jones
    • Where There’s a Dill, There’s a Way
    1. Travis Armstrong Is Outta There
    2. S.B. Bank & Trust's Rocky Year
    3. UC Campuses Dominate Rankings
    4. What buildings did architect Julia Morgan design in Santa Barbara?
    5. Sexile
    6. Rattlesnake and San Roque Side of Jesusita Trails to Re-Open Friday
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.