In response to your story Rigs-to-Reefs Bill on Governor’s Desk: Sunken offshore oil rigs are not a scientifically proven habitat for marine life, they may leave significant contamination in the ocean from polluted shell and debris mounds, and they pose possible safety and liability issues for the State of California.
As well, artificial reef creation may cost a significant amount of resources with substantial environmental impacts on the regional ecosystem. AB 2503 Rigs-to-Reefs would allow oil platforms to be abandoned at sea instead of following existing laws requiring their complete removal. It should be rejected pending further study of the environmental and economic impacts, and the liability issues to the state.
As Ms. Linda Krop from the Environmental Defense Center noted in her group letter opposing the bill, the attempt to allow early decommissioning of wells by paying the state remediation-cost-savings from leaving the sunken behemoths on the ocean floor is not lawful. Only the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management can guarantee decommissioning federal wells, regardless of state or private compacts.
Unfortunately, she and her adherents failed to understand this very federal enforceability issue when they argued that PXP could be granted a state offshore drilling lease at Tranquillon Ridge in exchange for early decommissioning promises on four federal wells. Good thing her efforts failed in that case.
Comments
As usual, Mr. Eidt is absolutely correct. The benefits of leaving the rigs in place is dubious and Ms. Krop had to know that what she now says in her letter about how rigs cannot be decommissioned early without the permission of the federal government was also true when it came to PXP. Thus that deal was not only dangerous from the perspective of oil spills but totally unenforceable
GOOfy (anonymous profile)
September 10, 2010 at 8:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
So how do you prove your hypothesis that rigs do not make good environmental reefs? Prove it with a demonstration project first then I'll concur. Scientific method over emotion works every time.
On a side note. My own observation based on the fact that I lived in Mississippi for a couple of years, is that the best fishing and mussells were always right at the drill platforms. I guess the fish haven't gotten the enviro message yet. Daniel Petry
jcrdan (anonymous profile)
September 10, 2010 at 9:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yummy jcrdan... nothing like mussels grown in toxic drilling muds. Super well maintained and grow like their own steroids !
4Oceans (anonymous profile)
September 10, 2010 at 2:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Eibt reeks of another NGO thorn in the side waiting for a oil company kickback to turn a blind eye like the Ocean Conservancy did when they were caught extorting the Moss Landing power plant(PG&E). Well documented and reputation tarnished, they expeditiously changed their name from the Ocean Conservation Society to the Ocean Conservancy.
Admit it, everybody smells the pot of gold here and if you want your share just cop to it and offer up some credible scientific method cause you are not going to get away with it at the expense of enhancing biodiversity in our local ocean environment.
dablinders (anonymous profile)
September 11, 2010 at 7:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)