The misty weather that briefly delayed the test launch of a nuclear-capable missile from Vandenberg Air Force Base early Saturday morning didn’t discourage more than 70 activists from gathering at the facility’s main gate to protest what they said was another example of unconscionable and potentially catastrophic posturing from an overreaching military industrial complex. Fifteen members of the group, including prominent antiwar activists Daniel Ellsberg and Cindy Sheehan, made the symbolic decision to cross from the designated protest area onto base property, where they were arrested for trespassing.
Similar preplanned demonstrations and acts of civil disobedience are a regular event at Vandenberg. A small group of Santa Barbara activists often turns out for military launches from the base, but Saturday’s protest saw a bigger crowd than normal — dozens caravaned from Northern California and Nevada — drawn by the presence of the big-name peaceniks. Ellsberg, a former government military strategist, sent U.S. officials scrambling when he leaked the “Pentagon Papers” to the press in 1971. Sheehan generated headlines and controversy when she camped outside George W. Bush’s Texas ranch in 2005 to object to the Iraq War after her son was killed in action.
“This protest is a success even if the test goes off because it shows you can’t test first-strike weapons in this country without having to arrest Americans to do it,” Ellsberg announced to the crowd Saturday before he was arrested, repeating a statement he made in 1983 during a Vandenberg launch demonstration where he was placed in custody. He’s argued for decades, in speeches and literature, that rather than deterring overseas attacks, America’s intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) fleet provides a target and motive for a first strike.
Despite the activists’ effort and opposition this week, a Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile ICMB took off from Vandenberg at 2:46 a.m. and flew 4,200 miles to a test range in the Marshall Islands. Reaching a top speed of 15,000 mph, it took the dummy warhead around 30 minutes to reach its mark. The last Minuteman III launch, carried out in July 2011, failed when flight technicians detected an “anomaly” and detonated the missile over the Pacific Ocean. Another was scheduled for this Thursday, but it’s been delayed. Three more are planned throughout year. Saturday’s successful launch, meant to assess the weapon system’s accuracy and reliability, was overseen by the base’s new boss (and the first female commander of the 30th Space Wing) Col. Nina Armagno. Each test launch reportedly costs around $20 million.
Nearly three hours before takeoff, the crowd of protesters gathered on a patch of grass across the street from the base’s main gate. Some carried signs that read “Pray for Peace” and “No Nukes, No Drones.” Others held small cardboard coffins. All the while, Vandenberg airmen kept close watch nearby and a few in plain clothes walked among the protesters.
Sheehan, standing in the middle of the circle that formed and speaking through a bullhorn, announced her intention to be arrested. “I am going to do an act of civil disobedience,” she said. “I am going to fulfill my responsibility as a human being.” Explaining that the U.S. needs to do away with the idea that war is a viable tool in the arsenal of foreign policy, Sheehan said politics and party affiliation should take a backseat to appreciating the value of all life. “It doesn’t matter if Bush or Obama or McCain or whoever is president,” she went on. “The military industrial complex rules this country.”
Pauli O-toko of Micronesia, where the Marshall Islands are located, said he and his family came to Vandenberg to plead with officials to stop the tests, saying they harm the country’s environment and people. Judy Talaugon, a Chumash descendant, prayed to the Creator to stop Saturday’s launch and all others. And David Krieger, head of Santa Barbara’s Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, read two original poems denouncing the military’s lack of morality and judgment.
As a drum played and a few protesters began singing, 14 members of the crowd separated themselves into a huddle for introductions and a short briefing. One man hesitated on the edge of the group for a moment before handing his sign to a friend and joining in. “I gotta do it,” he said. “I gotta go.”
Arm-in-arm, the group stepped into the road leading directly into the base. As they crossed a thick green line painted on the pavement that separates the designated protest zone from off-limits Vandenberg property, a bullhorn rang out. A line of airmen with a convoy of patrol cars and vans behind them began walking up the road toward the protesters, who were signing, “Stop the missile launching, we will not be moved.” When the activists made it approximately 50 yards down the street, the airmen ordered them to stop. “Stop the launch!” one protester yelled in response. “We are here tonight to enter the base,” Father Louis Vitale, a former Air Force pilot and longtime Vandenberg demonstrator, told the security personnel.
At that, the order was given to arrest the group. “Take them,” an officer said. The protesters were told to turn around as the airmen slipped plastic cuffs around their wrists. “You’re handcuffing a national hero who stopped the Vietnam War,” Sheehan said as Ellsberg was taken into custody. When it was her turn, she said over and over, “My son was killed in Iraq, and you’re inhibiting his mother’s freedom of speech.” Turning to Ellsberg a few moments later while they were led to the nearby vans, Vitale said, “Well, Dan, here we go again.”
Before that a protester with her small dog in tow began crying when an airmen took the leash from her hand. He explained her dog would be looked after and returned as soon as she was released. “Jimminy!” she wailed as she was lead away. “Oh, Jimminy!” After they were processed and cited, the 15 protesters were released at around 4 a.m. All will appear in front of a federal magistrate to pay the fine or fight it.
A couple of miles away at an outdoor viewing site in the heart of base, members of the media and dozens of Vandenberg airmen, some with their wives and children, gathered to watch the launch. They stood around stamping their feet and lighting small campfires to keep warm as word came that the launch would be delayed by 45 minutes. The sound of country music and the thumps of tossed horseshoes lead up to the rumble of the rocket as it flew from its underground silo, the only visible evidence of it in the air a quick flash of light in the thick fog. As the ICBM lifted off, the airmen shouted and clapped. “Go bitch!” someone yelled. “Hell yeah!” hollered another. “America!”
While Vandenberg is the only base that conducts test Minuteman III launches—their path over the ocean minimizes potential damage if things go wrong—there are 450 on-alert ICBMs at military bases in Wyoming, Montana, and North Dakota. One arm of the U.S. nuclear triad, they’re the United States’ only way of delivering nuclear warheads from the ground. “This force fulfills a critical role in deterring potential adversaries while maintaining global stability,” said Megan Meyer of Air Force Global Strike Command, which manages the fleet.
But they may be causing instability elsewhere. Deborah Manase, head of the Marshall Islands Environmental Protection Authority, told The Independent before Saturday’s launch that the U.S. military’s permit with the Marshallese government to drop dummy nukes into one its atolls expired in 2010 pending an updated Environmental Assessment Report which hasn’t been published. She also expressed concern that depleted uranium and beryllium—reportedly found in the test missiles’ guts—harm sensitive ecosystems and threaten human health when they fall into the ocean. Representatives of U.S. Army Kwajalein Atoll, which Vandenberg and Global Strike Command directed The Independent to speak with, couldn’t be reached for comment by press time.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
Cheers for the protesters, except the woman with the dog, willing to demonstrate and pay the fine (how much of a fine?)
Some of the demonstrators, though, are but publicity hounds and it will be interesting to read how many are there on Thursday and at the other three tests, if Ellsberg is not there.
at_large (anonymous profile)
February 27, 2012 at 8:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Imagine whirrled peas! :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
February 27, 2012 at 9:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I am saddened that civilization has yet to find a way to resolve our differences besides going to war against each other. Having said this, I don't see the point of participating in protests at Vandenberg and taking it to the extent of trespassing when you know you'll get arrested, only makes these people look like kooks to those reading about it later. Perhaps they should consider taking a different approach to preventing launches because protesting at the Airforce Gate isn't working.
JAM (anonymous profile)
February 27, 2012 at 10:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
JAM:
What do you mean the protest isn't working? Ellsberg said it was a success...Cindy Sheehan was there too, so isn't this a total win?
There is no possible way a protester ever looks/acts like a kook.
All this time I've spent in uniform I thought guys like Brad Kasal and Dakota Meyer were heroes.
I love this article for changing my mind...
Marine0369 (anonymous profile)
February 27, 2012 at 12:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It must be nice to view the world through rose colored glasses. Do you all actually think that it would be all sunshine and rainbows if we just stood down our entire military and destroyed all of our weapons. Yes the worls would comming to embrace us. Then you all could protest the public beheadings becuase your new government didn't like the flower skirt you were wearing, or the anti government slogans you were spouting. The young men and wemen that have vowed to defend our country (and your right to protest) she be honered by everyone. I am sure that Sheehans sure was rolling over in his grave as he say the sacrifice he made defiled with blood spit and piss, whay to go MOM.
Tom071 (anonymous profile)
February 27, 2012 at 12:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@Tom, this is not about an idealistic view of the world. The message of all those I know who engaged in this civil resistance is that the land-based missiles make the US more at risk because it gives the Russians a reason to continue targeting us with their arsenal. The Minuteman missiles are first-strike weapons only, "use them or lose them." Even operating as we are under the theory of nuclear deterrence, nothing would be lost in terms of US security by scrapping the land-based portion of the triad.
rhw (anonymous profile)
February 27, 2012 at 4:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Protesting is a person's choice but I have never seen it being very effective in the ICBM debate. What was effective in the past were the cultural exchanges and communication at the citizen level. Alas, it is easier to drive to Vandenburg than to join the Peace Corps or join an NGO.
passagerider (anonymous profile)
February 27, 2012 at 4:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This is a very dangerous game we are playing with nuclear weapons. We have come close to self-destruction, (and for most, it will be slow, radiation poisoning) by accident and in national standoffs. It's just a matter of time.
Although our government tells us it's only defensive, we have the most, and we circle Russia and other countries with them. When is such a super "defense" recognized as what it is, offensive? We could do a lot more to disarm, a lot more. If we did, others would feel less threatened and do the same. We would have more credibility and trust. Defensiveness and threatening may work in the short run but not the long run.
Human progress, as far as rights and compassion, has not come from the top of governments down, but from peoples' movements up - women's vote, civil rights, etc. This is the logic of those very sane and right protesters Friday night. If more of us made a fuss, got arrested, or made the news regularly about it - if a lot of us did it - then the policy makers would have to listen and we could make the change to stop the poisoning now, and the catastrophe that is coming.
JimSilva (anonymous profile)
February 27, 2012 at 9:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Jim by the way Russia actually has more nuclear weapons than the United States if you do the research, and as for ringing them China and North Korea actually border Russia both of them have nuclear weapons. Besides Europe and not on their border or submarine based where do we "ring" them?
pointssouth (anonymous profile)
February 27, 2012 at 11:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Cindy, Cindy, Cindy. I thought you got over yourself when you realized that the American commie party & their leftie supporters like Hugo Chavez were using you like the tool you are.
We were hoping you'd go away & actually do something meaningful to respect your son's memory & his decision to re-enlist to serve his country & thus pay the ultimate sacrifice.
Not that the Iraq War was a good thing, it wasn't, but decisions get made that have lasting repercussions, Casey made his, respect that.
Well, we now know you ain't going anywhere fast & are still the tool you've always been.
A sad thing because it tarnishes the memory of your son & the ideals he had while on this Earth.
But you're just a symptom to the problem. The real problem is the Ellsbergs (supposed national hero who supposedly stopped the Vietnam War) & Father (veteran of Vandenberg demonstrations, but not a military veteran) Vitales & their view of life through rosy colored glasses. You're being used, yet again. Casey is sad.
In any case, nice to know we still check our arsenal, as Russia, China, N. Korea, Iran, Pakistan & India still test theirs.
The main difference between our arsenal & "theirs" is that our warheads have a CEP (circle error propbable) of +/- 1 meter while theirs is a bit larger.
In any case, when a nuke goes off that CEP won't matter, everything nearby is getting obliterated.
Maybe that's why we've never been in an all out nukefest, the fear of what can happen is a deterrent. See how that works? Let peace reign, a true soldier trains for war but prays for peace. Now go home Cindy, we've seen enough :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
February 28, 2012 at 1:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
PointSouth,
According to the Arms Control Association we have more nuclear warheads, http://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets...
but it's not important because either one has enough to fulfill everyone's death wish and take the rest of life with it in a hurry.
The US installing missiles in Romania, and ones planned in Poland, and radar in Turkey, together with your mention of submarines and the rest of Europe, pretty much rings the populated area of Russia, so they could justifiably feel increasingly threatened, in spite of the latest arms agreements.
I think your point is are we defensive or offensive and aren't we justified in being either?
Don't you agree from personal experience, two defensive or offensive people never solved an argument. Doesn't it take one to drop the fear and defensiveness and act on the greater truth that we are all one? Isn't there more chance that the other will come along and also drop the defenses if that is the case? Isn't that the wisest course for us, given the dire consequences of continued defensiveness or offensiveness?
From that standpoint we try, we do what we can do, see if Russia comes along, be patient. I think the defensive people here would be surprised. Real progress would be made, and together the US and Russia could use their leverage to get the other states to disarm.
What's the alternative? Staying behind our defensive wall, feeding our industrial/military complex, waiting for annihilation?
That is not freedom. We should be moving toward peace. On nuclear disarmament, Obama is, more than Bush was, but Obama still seems to be the slave of corporate interests, willing to be the CEO of US empire.
So it's up to each of us to do what we can do, so I say it's good that the protesters speak out when so many are silent. Hopefully we won't have to wait until there is a disaster before we have enough people join in and move the leaders toward peace.
JimSilva (anonymous profile)
February 28, 2012 at 7:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Do you all actually think that it would be all sunshine and rainbows if we just stood down our entire military and destroyed all of our weapons."
-- Tom071
That strawman must have used up every stalk available in North County.
BTW, I made a bet with myself when I read the title of this article that hank/henry would be infesting this thread. I won the bet - hank owes me a gyro!
SezMe (anonymous profile)
February 29, 2012 at 2:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
SuzIe, I thnk u mean "infecting" not infesting. I 2 bet myslf that u'd b on here, #whining @ me as usual & as usual, I #won. SuzIe, #whining all the time. U owe me a bowl of caldo gallego :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
February 29, 2012 at 8:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Evolution will someday place our creation (robots) at the top of a planet that will be so contaminated by our own hand, never fear, they will worship us as gods and take us beyond this solar system. Since the protesting doesn't work, maybe the protesters should consider taking up arms?
spacey (anonymous profile)
February 29, 2012 at 12:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
A more likely scenario, Spacey, if you don't mind me taking the ball and running with it, is this one: The "Powers That Be", that is, the powers that control the Pentagon and the Defense Department, create and deploy military robots (like the already-existing, Bigdog, the worlds most advanced quadruped robot, built with the funding and support of DARPA.) to subdue and control the masses. A one-world government emerges from the carnage, ruled by the "Machine-Masters" and dedicated to the enslavement of the entire human-race. The Earth groans beneath the fully-articulated, mechanical feet of our conquerers, the sky grows dark with their carbon-fiber, razor-edged wings. Finally, even the "masters" succumb to the relentless machines and the surface of the planet is scorched, purified, mankind is exterminated. With Earth free of life the Warbots, compelled to continue pursuing their "prime directive", leave this planet in search of other biological life to extinguish. Earth is remembered thereafter and throughout the then-populated cosmos as the Demon Planet, the place where the "machine plague" originated. Within a relatively short time though, a million years at best, even the memory of Earth dies as the last biological being in the universe is crushed beneath the treads of a Warbot and the space between the planets grows deathly still: All flesh is perished...thanks a lot People of Earth, jerks.
shibboleth (Wayne Gilbert Myers)
February 29, 2012 at 12:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Lyrics from the song "Ever" by that 1980's punk band from SF Flipper: "Ever wish the human race didn't exist, then realize that you're one too... :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
February 29, 2012 at 1:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
shibboleth (Wayne Gilbert Myers)
February 29, 2012 at 3:48 p.m.
Well, it is nice to see censorship works both ways :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
February 29, 2012 at 11:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It's never nice to see censorship, Hank, but it does make it a little more palatable when it cuts both ways, I agree.
shibboleth (Wayne Gilbert Myers)
March 1, 2012 at 9:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Agreed, he/she who controls the DELETE key is the ultimate master of the blogs :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
March 1, 2012 at 11:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Users should also be able to delete their own comments. There've been times when I've commented half caffeinated and was either completely wrong or even misrepresented my own position.
I often find the censorship here arbitrary. There's the rules, then there's some secret codebook somewhere in which even if you have proof from the INDY itself, your statement is somehow defamatory.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
March 1, 2012 at 5:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
KenV: "There've been times when I've commented half caffeinated and was either completely wrong or even misrepresented my own position."
Good point Ken. Me personally, I think my "issue" comes from the fact that I have a East Coast type of vernacular & sense of humor, something not understood by many West Coasters.
This is something I got from 15 years of living in Miami, FL & my exposure to snowbirds from NY, NJ, PA & MA.
They're definitely a 1 of a kind the way they speak, but the thing is none of them take it personally. Out here, folks are just a tad sensitive.
Sometimes I sound like 1 of the infamous Jerky Boys & that can sometimes be seen as "rude" by some folks. Oh well.
It rubs some people wrong & I can accept that. It sometimes gets my posts deleted & I can accept that too.
In either case, we ALL make comments that kind of drive the Indy mods nuts & I gotta hand it to them for showing exceptional cool in otherwise tense situations :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
March 1, 2012 at 5:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hank-I do not know what explains my sense of humor and sarcasm but at least the correct people seem to get it...
The new and improved Ken_Volok scares me a little bit. Too reasonable. Too rationale. Too logical. Too humorous.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
March 2, 2012 at 9:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"The new and improved Ken_Volok scares me a little bit. Too reasonable. Too rationale. Too logical. Too humorous."
If you think the new Ken is amazing, wait until the 2013 edition of hank rolls off the shelf.
fivedolphins (anonymous profile)
March 3, 2012 at 2:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)
To the contrary, I saw the Hank2013 demo and the government has weighed down the old streamlined Hank with back up cameras, roll over protection, air bags, and an impossible to meet efficiency standard. Hold on to your old Hank as regulations may make a new model a pipe dream.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
March 3, 2012 at 6:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)