A Fine Whine
No Way Out
Thursday, June 14, 2012
NO WAY OUT: It’s perversely fitting the county supervisors will contemplate cutting the county Mental Health department by $7 million the same week that David Attias, the former UCSB student who killed four people in Isla Vista in 2001, testified he’s gained sufficient control over his raging mental illness to be released from Patton State psychiatric hospital. The good news is that Attias — who was deemed not guilty by reason of insanity 10 years ago, is now taking Depakote, an anti-psychotic medication that keeps petty annoyances and vexations from triggering blazing infernos in his brain. The bad news is it took his caretakers eight years to figure this out. The other bad news is that Santa Barbara County executives have proposed cutting the jobs of 15 frontline county mental-health workers. But they’re also pushing to increase Mental Health’s administrative expenditures by $500,000 so they can hire 10 new administrative workers. I’m sure in some parallel universe this makes sense, but not the one where I live.
Angry Poodle
Maybe there’s no real connection. Typically, county Mental Health serves the poorest of the poor. David Attias, the profoundly troubled man-child of a successful TV director, has always had access to the best care and treatment money could buy. But like many mentally ill people, Attias never thought he needed treatment until it was too late. During his first trial, one expert after another testified Attias was legally insane when he gunned his car into a crowd, knocking five people out of their shoes with such sudden violence that their laces remained tied. Only one survived. And the experts were right. Accordingly, Judge Thomas Adams sentenced Attias to treatment at Patton rather than 60 years behind bars. Now his handlers there — doctors, psychologists, and therapists — say he’s safe enough to be released to a highly structured community-release program run by the state. Not only that, but two psychological experts hired by county prosecutors say so, too. That’s because in the past 18 months, the experts at Patton have finally figured out Attias’s diagnosis: pervasive developmental disorder. And since they put him on Depakote, he’s not so arrogant, entitled, abrasive, and confrontational. Maybe we should spike the water supply with this stuff. It’s worth noting that Depakote is one of the many medications Attias stopped taking shortly after turning 18 and enrolling at UCSB. He preferred the recreational release offered by a cat tranquilizer with psychotic side effects, ketamine, instead.
Today, the experts assure us that the mayhem Attias wrought was caused by drug-induced psychosis. Keep Attias off crazy-making drugs, they insist, and he can be released and safely managed. But keep him in Patton much longer, they warn, and he’ll be “institutionalized” beyond the pale of possible recovery. To counter the considerable weight of all these experts, prosecutor Paula Waldman spent $10,000 of taxpayer money to pay forensic psychologist Margaret Hagen to fly out from Boston University, where she teaches, to testify that most therapy is psychobabble junk science, that rehabilitation for Attias is all but impossible, and that he should be kept locked up until such time as he is too old, slow, and arthritic to pose a physical threat. Hagen is famous for having written what’s described as a “blistering exposé” of the essential corruption of court-appointed psychological experts. Her book, Whores of the Court, is a monument to scholarly dispassion. As Attias’s attorney Deedrea Edgar noted, Hagen has never been a licensed psychologist, never had a private practice, never diagnosed a patient, never had a patient committed, never written any scholarly peer-reviewed papers, and never interviewed David Attias. Edgar suggested, via pointed cross-examination, Hagen herself could be regarded as one of the experts-for-hire for whom she’s expressed such scathing contempt. On the stand, Hagen’s expertise seemed rooted in scholarly articles dating back to the 1970s and 1990s that she’d downloaded off the Internet and the details of which she could recall only with a striking degree of un-specificity.
While I am quick to believe the mental health field is unduly populated by quacks and well-intentioned incompetents, Hagen proved not just unconvincing on the stand but alarmingly so. Should the judge’s decision hinge on her testimony, Attias will soon be out on the streets. Next time the District Attorney wants to shell out $10,000 for some crackpot opinion, call me. I’m quick and florid, know a few big words, and can certainly use the money. Hagen, I was shocked to find out, has been hired no less than four times by local prosecutors in the past year.
Saving the day for prosecutor Waldman was Attias himself. On the witness stand, he came across surprisingly well: a smart, articulate, forthcoming, and reflective über-nerd struggling to come to terms with the monstrosity of his actions. He made no real mistakes. But to succeed, he had to be great. And he was merely good. Where Waldman went for jugular, questioning Attias about X-rated letters he sent to an unsuspecting — and freaked-out — recipient he’d never met, she scored, at least with me, when pressing Attias to explain his new diagnosis. “It’s a developmental disorder,” he said. “It’s a form of autism. … It’s a problem in my brain.” The best he could muster was, “Not being in tune with what’s going on with others, being impulsive, not thinking.” The answers matter because the last time Attias snapped, four people got sent to the morgue. After 10 years in Patton, I’d have thought he had a clearer idea of what makes him go tick-tick-tick. Likewise, I would have expected he’d have spent more time focusing on the damage he’d caused. It came out on the witness stand that he’s only just starting. How can Attias stop himself from blowing up if he doesn’t understand what makes him explode in the first place?
My hunch is that Attias will be kept in Patton a few more years. Maybe he’ll do the work he needs to; maybe he won’t. But the next time one of her prosecutors wants to hire Hagen as an expert, perhaps District Attorney Joyce Dudley should donate the funds to county Mental Health instead. At least one mental health worker’s job could be saved. Admittedly, that’s not much. But it’s a start.
Related Links
Comments
Looks like the clowns are running the circus.
"Santa Barbara County executives have proposed cutting the jobs of 15 frontline county mental-health workers. But they’re also pushing to increase Mental Health’s administrative expenditures by $500,000 so they can hire 10 new administrative workers."
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
June 14, 2012 at 12:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
And this is the rub. They say they need new taxes to prevent cutting of these workers. In reality, they have the money, the issue is how they choose to spend it. Think about that the next time they ask to increase taxes to preserve services.
Botany (anonymous profile)
June 14, 2012 at 7:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It really is disgusting.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
June 14, 2012 at 12:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I thought we all blamed Attias' behavior on the chaos of Isla Vista. If that is true, perhaps he should be released. If he is truly insane, I guess it isn't Isla Vista's fault.
Nick didn't even mention that the public defender argued for Attias.
Nicholas Bourdakis, Christoper Divis, Elie Israel, Ruth Levy, Albert Levy. I remember you. I've met Albert Levy, he is amazingly positive, an inspiration.
pardallchewinggumspot (anonymous profile)
June 14, 2012 at 1:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Once again I'll state the obvious lest we be led astray: How do we know he would take his medication (assuming the meds are actually helping him) once he is released?
His case is a medical, not criminal one. Treat him humanely, but please keep him off the streets.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
June 14, 2012 at 5:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It is hard to believe that Hagen has survived the "publish or perish" culture of Boston University without publishing peer-reviewed articles in various academic journals. Nobody gets tenure without publishing. After tenure is convered, nobody gets respect from ones peers without publishing. Hagen is either a adjunct lecturer with no tenure and prospects for a permanent position at any university, or she has indeed published and Nick has not got this quite right.
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
June 14, 2012 at 7:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Santa Barbara County executives have proposed cutting the jobs of 15 frontline county mental-health workers. But they’re also pushing to increase Mental Health’s administrative expenditures by $500,000 so they can hire 10 new administrative workers."
Those executives need to have their heads examined. Oh, wait, they just got rid of the mental-health workers.
blackpoodles (anonymous profile)
June 14, 2012 at 11:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
BU lists her as a "Professor" and shows her last published work as her book, Whores... in 1997; prior to that she has listings for 3 books in the 80's on art: http://www.bu.edu/psych/faculty/hagen/
at_large (anonymous profile)
June 14, 2012 at 11:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
According to the article she costs 10g plus travel and lodging no doubt. There's nobody qualified in this region? Perhaps already under county employ?
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
June 15, 2012 at 12:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks At-Large, Hagen's early expertise appears to have been the psychology of visual perception and more recently she has published work on the psychological impact of early childhood trauma. Her CV indeed shows that she has published both books (which for some reason don't count for much in academia), chapters in instructional text books, and articles in journals. What she appears to lack as an expert in the Attias case is any relavent research or expertise in abnormal psychology that leads to violent behavior. She seems like a weird "expert" for the DA in this case. I'll bet that she could tell me why I don't like the Apple computer user interface though.
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
June 15, 2012 at 12:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm really glad people are still taking an interest in this case. However, as the sister of one of the victims, who attended court for all 8 days, I would just like to clear something up. Margaret Hagen specializes in scientific research OF psychological assessments and their validity. She is not a practicing psychologist. Essentially she reads all of the studies regarding violence and risk, and the subsequent follow-up in the recidivism rates - in other words, how accurate are all of these studies that are supposed to predict if someone will reoffend violently. What did the tests SAY and what did the person DO. Can the results of these assessments be trusted to be accurate.
And the research overwhelmingly shows that NO, the studies are not accurate and therefore unreliable. That was Margaret's area of expertise. She was not there to test/analyze/evaluate David Attias in any way.
Again, thank you all for keeping this case and the discussions alive. It really means a lot to our families that people haven't forgotten!
lbourdakis (anonymous profile)
June 15, 2012 at 8:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This is classic of the Dudley-Waldman modus operandi, wherein the service of the community at large, justice and the law takes a back seat to personal ambition, ego, and the scandal of a "win-loss" record as the driving force behind the local D.A.'s office. But what do we expect? This is the same corrupt, self-aggrandizing culture that allowed Tom Sneddon to squander upwards of $3,000,000 going after Michael Jackson with sketchy "evidence" provided by questionable complaining witnesses with motivations having nothing to do with Truth. Waldman herself is a dessicated, passed-over clueless functionary serving the politically-motivated Dudley regime who is assigned cases prosecuted with the weakest of evidence simply to keep her in her place; a paper-pusher without an original thought. As Mr. Welsh so cogently points out: it ain't their money, so they spend it unaccountably and at their whim in pursuit of anything but the public good or the cause of justice. Winning and losing are the only things they fight for. When is the Grand Jury going to look at this office?
jjabercrombie66 (anonymous profile)
June 18, 2012 at 5:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
jjabercrombie for DA
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
June 18, 2012 at 6:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hagen is a crank; see, e.g., http://www.amazon.com/review/R1X3DTTT...
truth_machine (anonymous profile)
June 20, 2012 at 1:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"That was Margaret's area of expertise."
I feel for you, but both being a sister of a victim and on a first name basis with Dr. Hagen makes anything you have to say about her utterly unreliable.
truth_machine (anonymous profile)
June 20, 2012 at 1:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)