Smart Meter Under Protest

Open Letter to California Public Utilities Company:

Please be notified that in 2011, I originally requested to opt out of the Smart Meter program, however the option you and PGE have given the public is financially draining if the exorbitant $75 fee is imposed as well as the $10 monthly charge to have someone check the meter. (The fees you are charging are in addition to any monthly charges for electricity use.) Since I had requested to opt out, a smart meter should not have been placed at my rural address.

I have notified PGE and I hereby notify you that because of the cost of the financial penalty (you call an “option”), I am forced accept the Smart Meter. However, I am doing so UNDER PROTEST. I am hereby requesting that you allow me to retain my present meter and consider alternatives I am suggesting below.

The first alternative: That I retain the present meter and that I notify you each month/quarterly/every 6 months or once a year regarding the correct reading of said meter. You would then bill me for usage.

The second alternative: I I retain the present meter remain and that you and I estimate a yearly cost which I would pay up front and it would be adjusted at the end of each year or every six months.

As a matter of historical fact, PGE, in past years, initiate the first alternative that I suggested that proved to be successful in rural areas. (We are in a rural area) These were called “Estimated rural call ins”. Neither of the alternatives I have suggested is unreasonable or unworkable. Please respond.

Login

Please note this login is to submit events or press releases. Use this page here to login for your Independent subscription

Not a member? Sign up here.