Republicans and Democrats in Congress need to govern, not take a two-month break.
For two years, we have been hearing about how the partisanship and gridlock in Washington is making it impossible to get anything done. Republicans attack Democrats and Democrats attack Republicans. All the while, it’s the American people who pay the price. Well, that price, the price of inaction, is about to cost us a whole lot unless the politicians in Washington get their act together.
In Washington, they call it “sequestration” but in the real world it means cutting $11 billion from Medicare, cutting the number of food inspectors or air-traffic controllers on the job. It means reducing the readiness of our non-deployed military units, delaying investments in new equipment and facilities for our armed forces and downsizing base services for military families.
That means the Central Coast families who live and work at Vandenberg Air Force Base or Point Mugu Naval Air Station are caught in the middle, unsure if they’ll be able to keep their jobs and their homes.
Last year, Washington reached its credit card limit and instead of making tough decisions they did what they always do: kicked the can down the road and blamed one another on TV, leaving the rest of us to deal with the fallout.
You would think that in the face of this potentially devastating course of action, Republicans and Democrats would get their act together and start getting things done. Instead, they are planning to leave Washington at the end of the week and won’t go back to work until after the November election.
Imagine what would happen if you went to your boss tomorrow and said you were taking two months off while the work just piles up on your desk? That’s what the politicians in Washington are about to do.
In the real world, that two-month break will mean two more months of uncertainty for people who live and work at Vandenberg AFB or Point Mugu. For farmers in the Central Coast, that’s two more months of waiting for a Farm Bill to be passed. For every American taxpayer, that’s two more months of uncertainty as we wait to see if our taxes go up in January. For seniors, that’s two months of worrying if the system they paid into all their life will still be there tomorrow.
The American people don’t expect much, but they do expect their elected representatives to do their jobs. Until the people’s work is complete, the so-called “people’s house” should stay in Washington and do what they were all sent there to do: Govern.
The architects of our country believed in honest disagreements and compromise that brought out the best in both sides and ultimately the best policies for our nation. Public servants in Washington were supposed to be statesmen, driven by a common commitment to steer the future course of our country towards a path of prosperity.
No matter where you fall on the ideological spectrum, when Washington doesn’t work, we all pay the price. Whether you’re a grandparent or a college graduate, a small business owner or a teacher, when Washington doesn’t work, everyone pays the price.
We all acknowledge that there are very real and tough challenges confronting our country right now. There are no easy answers. There is no silver-bullet. But the first step on the path of progress is putting aside the cloak of partisanship to embrace a spirit that places more value on solutions and less value on blame.
The reason why things are getting worse in America is because the Republicans and Democrats in Washington lack the will to look beyond the political calculations and keep taking the easy and expedient way out. That has to change. This is a moment for Republicans and Democrats in Washington to turn the page on the mistakes of the past and in one, unified voice actually do the unthinkable and put people before politics. I have always believed that decisions are made by those who show up. For our elected representatives in Washington, they can make the choice to show-up every day to do the people’s work or they can keep doing what they have been doing, go home and point blame.
Of course, they are making a pretty big assumption - after all, if they chose to leave Washington right now, is there really any rationale to send them back?
Abel Maldonado is running for Congress in the 24th Congressional District of California


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
The usual nonsense placing the blame on both parties when in fact it's Maldonado's party that announced from day 1 that it's highest priority was working against Obama rather than working for America. A perfect example: a minority of 40 Republicans in the Senate blocked a bill supported by 58 senators that would have helped veterans get jobs. http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/20...
pk (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 7:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
And Maldonado would like people to forget that “sequestration” was necessary because Paul Ryan led the charge to refuse cooperation with Obama when the President offered to cut programs in exchange for concessions on taxes that Republicans have pledged never, ever to make under any circumstance whatsoever, even as part of a bargain to reduce the deficit that only became an issue with them when a Democrat took office.
In addition, it was the Republicans who used the debt limit as a hostage to try to bludgeon the President into giving them everything they wanted, which is their idea of bipartisan compromise. It's dishonest nonsense to blame sides on the grounds that Democrats objected to a demand to completely surrender to a form of blackmail that would have damaged the US and the world economy.
pk (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 7:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yes PK, everything that's wrong in the world is the Republican's fault. If only the public had the common sense to elect only Democrats, then the world would be a perfect place. Nothing like an objective opinion to start my morning!
Botany (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 8:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Even better PK is that Obama announced today that his biggest failure was lack of immigration reform and then blamed the Republicans even though he outright LIED and did not even bring up the issue when the Dem's controlled the House and Senate like he originally promised. Amazing that when the election in on the line he's pandering like a strutting hooker.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 10:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Botany
It's ridiculously over the top and ignores what I actually said to claim that I blamed everything in the world on Republicans when in fact what I did was point out Maldonado's nonsense in ignoring Republican obstructionism and the fact that their notion of bipartisan compromise is to demand that Democrats surrender and give Republicans what they want.
As for objectivity, if it's objectively false that a minority of Republican senators blocked aid to unemployed veterans. prove it. If it is objectively false to claim that the Republican leader in the Senate declared it his party's top priority to deny Obama a second term, prove that too.
Italiansurg continues his tired tactic of trying to find examples of Democratic malfeasance every time someone points out something the Republicans have done. If Romney murdered someone, Italiansurg would say, sure, but what about that parking ticket Obama once got?
pk (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 10:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Watch out Abel, someone from your party might read what you just wrote. Brilliant politics if you don't mean any of it. If you meant every word, I suggest finding a party that has a similar platform.
spacey (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 12:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Yeah no kidding Spacey. You knew the GOP leadership wasn't on the side of the country when their one vow was to deny Obama any success and a second term, and the country has suffered greatly.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 12:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I gleefully point out the partisanship of both extremes. The Indy just has more rampant Progressives commenting without any objectivity or intellectual honesty. Plus, my recent comment about Obama and immigration has even been laughed at by moderate reporters.
And guess what, KV and I agree once again...
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 5:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Obama made some stupid clumsy remarks to Hispanics, but the entire Romney/Ryan campaign has been built on lies, deceptions, and contempt for voters (Obama apologizes for America, Obama wants to make it easier for welfare recipients to avoid having to work, Obama sympathized with Islamic murderers in the Mid East, Obama wants to take away the voting rights of people in the military, Obama's 47% of the voters are lazy dependent freeloaders, etc.), and to Italiansurg these are supposed to be equivalent. In fact, what Italiansurg considers equivalent "extremes" are on one hand straw men constructed by Republicans of irrelevant leftist fringe figures with no access to political power versus on the other hand the all-too-relevant heart of the Republican party and its policies.
And yes, KV, when the Republicans are so determined to thwart Obama that they even block attempts to help veterans get jobs, the country suffers greatly.
pk (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 5:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks for proving my point pk. Have an Occupy Weekend.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 5:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It's always tricky to try to guess what point italiansurg believes he's made when he puffs up in triumph and stomps off in self-declared victory. Here I'm guessing that he thinks it proves how biased I am that I dared to illustrate the absurdity of his tiresome claim that he criticizes "the partisanship of both extremes." He response reinforces exactly what I suggested: that he considers it a partisan extreme to list explicit Romney lies. His final remark underscores how flat and uninspired his self-satisfied cleverness actually is.
pk (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 10:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This Italian guy seems to be the dinosaur headed for extinction that Senator Lindsay Graham speaks of when he says this -
“The demographics race we’re losing badly. We’re not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term.”
geeber (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 11:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Let’s just say it: The Republicans are the problem.
This was the title of an opinion piece by two highly respected and long-time watchers of Congress, Norm Ornstein at the conservative American Enterprise Institute and Thomas Mann at the moderate Brookings Institution:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinion...
This quote comes from their recent book, "It's Even Worse Than It Looks":
"We have been studying Washington politics and Congress for more than 40 years, and never have we seen them this dysfunctional. In our past writings, we have criticized both parties when we believed it was warranted. Today, however, we have no choice but to acknowledge that the core of the problem lies with the Republican Party."
It's not all gloom and doom though. Ornstein and Mann offer suggestions on how to rehabilitate Congress based on their decades of observation:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinion...
Chief among those remedies is campaign finance reform (I agree). One of the more novel suggestions was following Australia's lead and imposing a fine for *not* voting.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
September 22, 2012 at 12:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Except geebmeister that I am only white if as a racist you consider all Europeans "white" because of our recent cultural heritage. I'm brown as hell and from genetically typical mixed blood from the European and African continents. The Spaniards have something to say about that as well. But don't let the facts get in the way of your truth...
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 22, 2012 at 11:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Something isn't right here...at the end of the letter I didn't see "I'm Abel Maldonado, and I approve this letter".
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 22, 2012 at 2:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You have to actually get to Washington before you leave it Mr. Maldonado, and I just don't see that happening. Best bet: Pay your taxes, leave your bubble.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 22, 2012 at 10:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
pk-It's awesome how you blast the Republican partisanship by being overtly partisan on the extreme left. Apparently you too are part of the problem since your posts infer an inability to do anything but demonize nearly 1/2 of our population.
But then again, since your views are correct, wait, uh, that's what the other side says too.
While you are pontificating remember that some of us, like me for example, despised Bush as much as we despise Obama. I'll take the womanizing/victimizing, position changing, B.Clinton any day; he understood how to govern the ENTIRE country and even figured out how to work with one of the worst Congressional groups, let by Gingrich the jackass, in my tenure in the U.S.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 23, 2012 at 4:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I don't recall the Democratic Party, with all it's faults vowing that their number one mission was to defeat Bush, Bush, Reagan, Ford, Nixon ect ect
They put their party above the country's interests; registered Republicans no longer make up half the population because of it.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 23, 2012 at 5:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Do Dem's make up 1/2 of the electorate or just the loudest voices on the left coast? I honestly don't know.
Neither have I forgotten how Gingrich and company refused to do anything productive and instead focused on Clinton's personal debauchery at the expense of the country. The vast majority of Americans did not care either because he was too good of a President.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 23, 2012 at 6:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Glad to see the usual crowd has shown up. OK, this Tuesday night at 7 KEYT is running a debate between Capps and Maldonado. You can get on www.keyt.com and post your questions for the candidates. Here is what I just sent in, and if Mr. Maldonado is reading this, he can answer on this blog:
"Question for Mrs. Capps and Mr. Maldonado: Mrs. Capps, you voted for HR 1540, also known as the National Defense Authorization Act which allows the government to detain people indefinitely without trial if they are *suspected* of aiding terrorism. How do you reconcile this vote with the 6th Amendment which states that a person accused of a crime will be granted a speedy trail by an impartial jury? Mr. Maldonado, do you also support this decision?
Bill Clausen, Solvang, Ca.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constituti...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National... (Third paragraph)
http://votesmart.org/candidate/key-vo... (Vote on Dec, 14, 2011)"
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 27, 2012 at 3:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)