George Relles
Here's where the bike lane ends on the busiest part of Hollister where bikes have to compete with buses and cars.
Dead Pedestrians Make Poor Shoppers
New Year Resolutions for City Council
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Nothing is so full of promise or as short-lived as a new stick of gum or a new year’s resolution. I confess that I have a 100 percent record regarding New Year resolutions: Of the many I have made, each has been faithfully annulled well before January elapsed.
So this year I have determined that the best possible course of action is to make several significant and determined resolutions for the New Year, but confine my selection only to resolutions to be carried out by others. This way, I can experience resolve without responsibility, much like media pundits, kibitzers, and my geometry teacher, Mr. Austreng, who lectured brilliantly about isosceles triangles but never actually built one.
Here are my lucky seven resolutions for the Goleta’s City Council in 2010:
1. Let’s leave Goleta’s General Plan alone. As candidates in 2006, several of our current council members pronounced our plan good, requiring only a minor “tune-up.” Now, after about four years, 223 council and Planning Commission meetings, 2,872 hours of public testimony, and 4,672 staff and consulting hours, at a cost roughly equal to the national debt of Uzbekistan, key changes were made that were more like an engine overhaul than a minor tune-up.
Goletans have had enough of this “home improvement”! Let’s LEAVE THE PLAN ALONE (unless you want to restore some of Goleta’s environmental protections that were junked during the so-called tune-up).
And since this resolution for Goleta’s council is one of abstention, below are other resolutions to which they could apply their ample energies and wisdom.
George Relles
Signs, signs, everywhere a sign in Goleta.
2. Before our town fully takes on the appearance of a community-wide retail mall, let’s resolve for the council to adopt a reasonable sign ordinance. The proliferation of huge, profoundly ugly, garish commercial signs, blocking each other and screaming for attention, is like an exploding scoreboard at a Portuguese soccer match: They provide mostly color and hype, while conveying almost no useful information. Such signs erode the visual charms of our good land without elevating commerce.
Good sign ordinances need not inhibit free speech. We just need to remember that the louder these signs scream, the more they drown each other out. And let’s put an end to moving displays, be they powered by compressed air, wind, or humans. A moving sign does not move me.
3. For our next resolution, let’s say a word about our public library. That word would be “YES!” Let’s support it and keep it open with whatever funding is necessary.
With home computers, games, soccer fields, the ocean, bike paths, organized sports, etc., there is plenty for people to do, especially if they have resources. But the public library is the great equalizer for people who seek knowledge and entertainment on a budget. As tycoon Malcolm Forbes said: “The richest person in the world — in fact all the riches in the world — couldn’t provide you with anything like the endless, incredible loot available at your local library.”
George Relles
Here’s where pedestrians must “share” car lanes with cars at the busy Storke entrance to Camino Real Market place.
4. It’s time for our city planners to work with the Camino Real Marketplace to make it pedestrian-friendly. Have you ever bobsledded down the Matterhorn in your underwear or raced the bulls at Pamplona on a pogo stick (you on the pogo stick, not the bulls)? Well, neither would be as challenging or perilous as trying to walk across Storke Avenue into the Camino Real Marketplace because once you get across you suddenly realize, “Gee, there is NO SIDEWALK to get from the street into the parking lot.” Pedestrians must compete in the street entry with automotive traffic blazing in or out of the shopping center!
Here’s the crossing from Camino Real Marketplace to Albertson’s shopping center without a crosswalk or signal.
Comments
A title containing "Dead Pedestrians" was probably not the best choice of words today - as catchy and relevant as it is to this story, it is insensitive and seems ignorant, given last night's accident on Las Positas.
Would you consider re-wording?
earthtokatie (anonymous profile)
January 17, 2010 at 10:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow George Relles! You have the power to write, you have the power to engage those concepts to political banter and strike-up the signatures of like-minded townsfolk. Grass-Roots, my man, Grass-Roots!
dou4now (anonymous profile)
January 17, 2010 at 10:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Yes, quality trash/recycle containers and the cost of pickup...should be required donation by every store that sells food. Kids from the high school trash the neighborhood walking back from the local eatery. And I would be picking up more wayward trash if a trash/recycle container was at a corner nearby.
sbindyreader (anonymous profile)
January 17, 2010 at 11:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Per earthtokatie's comment about changing the title. I can see how you feel that way and respect your honorable intention, but I think that Relles's shock-value header is justified because it's a good way jolt people awake to what is happening.
No Bad Guys in this debate, just different approaches.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 17, 2010 at 11:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Great title! Even greater article.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
January 18, 2010 at 9:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
3 of 5 Goleta City Council members are up for re-election in November.
David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
January 18, 2010 at 9:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Bird (anonymous profile)
January 18, 2010 at 1:14 p.m.
Bird (anonymous profile)
January 18, 2010 at 1:16 p.m.
@earthtokatie
Oh yes, we must have decorum. When pedestrians are dying in traffic accidents, it's so "insensitive" to mention dead pedestrians in an article about traffic dangers for pedestrians.
Earth to you, indeed.
truth_machine (anonymous profile)
January 18, 2010 at 2:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So David,
When are you moving to The Good Land? I hear Silvia's got a room for rent...
sa1 (anonymous profile)
January 18, 2010 at 3:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You think that's bad? I used to take the bus from Isla Vista to Goleta Valley Cottage Hospital, and occasionally I had to go to the hospital itself along with the medical office buildings across the street. When my appointment at the hospital was finished, I realized crossing Patterson wouldn't be so easy.
1) South of Hollister, the first marked crosswalk along Patterson is 0.7 miles south at the bike trail. I could gamble it and try to run across the street where the Hollipat Center Drive intersection is.
2) I could walk back to Hollister, cross the street to the east side of Patterson, and walk along the dirt field (I guess asking for a paved sidewalk is too much)
I know that the Goleta City Council doesn't give a crap about pedestrians and the bus-using population, but I guess they have more important issues to deal with.
rc251 (anonymous profile)
January 18, 2010 at 4:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
As a frequent bicyclist, walker, driver and bus rider around Goleta, this article is GREAT, with an EXCELLENT title. Pedestrians must in places brave seven lanes of traffic to cross Hollister Avenue in Old Town Goleta. Plans were submitted more that a decade ago but no construction was ever started, to reconfigure Old Town Goleta like Coast Village Road, Montecito. There should be lanes for moving vehicles and bikes, a center island for pedestrians to pause while crossing no more than four traffic lanes, and a separate zone for parking vehicles.
Also zero progress so far on the west Goleta bike and pedestrian bridge over the 101. Let's get 'em done!
green_helmet (anonymous profile)
January 18, 2010 at 5:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Old Town Goleta Bike Lanes Now!!!
Thank you, George!
The huge city of Bogota, Colombia redid their entire transportation system to be bike, ped and transit friendly in less than three years.
Goleta has been unable to get bike lanes in Old Town Goleta in over three decades!
Imagine there were already bike lanes, wider sidewalks and a planted median.
Now imagine that someone said they would rip all of this out in order to provide a handful of storage spaces for private motor vehicles. Would any sane person approve of that?
If not, why is it we are doing this now?
And three people not in cars have died in Old Town Goleta recently just to keep those stupid parking spaces. Is the Goleta City Council guilty of second degree murder or just manslaughter?
sbrobert (anonymous profile)
January 18, 2010 at 11:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The "Dead Pedestrians..." title of this article is painful but it is is actually appropriate. Twenty years ago Las Positas Road residents and nearby neighbors concerned about school safety, their own safety and quality of life, sought representational relief from the results of modern car oriented transportation policies. The City administrator deemed Las Positas's safety record as "really quite good." Several design changes and an alternate truck route were suggested and realistically ignored. Requests for omnipresent law enforcement was short-lived. But the residents do have a 1995 signed letter from the much celebrated representative Harriet Miller committing the community to design changes.
Since that time the city has adopted it's Transportation and Circulation Element, a specific chapter in it's general plan. A Neighborhood Transporation Management Program has expired. Las Positas and Calle Real residents were invited and simultaneously excluded from any real meaningful participation. The Northside's Study for Outer State Street has been completed and there was hardly a mention about it's abused neighbors on the Las Positas arterial. Also since the grievances were first aired Calle Real residents street was mysterious and probably illegally widened from a 3 lane off-ramp to a 4 lane off-ramp. There currently is a project in the pipeline to improve access to Cottage Hospital by about 4 seconds but again the Las Positas Road and Calle Real concerns appear to being ignored even though they will be the most vulnerable.
So yes we need great bikeways, pedestrian paths and transit. "Traffic Calming" is a good idea. All public roads should be treated with equity. There is weird logic that allows transportation engineers the ability to label Samarkand Drive a "local street" while Las Positas a "major arterial." Hollister Avenue is similar to other busy streets as they are overused to the point of deadly abuse.
Camino Real Marketplace, when it first opened, had no "traffic calming." Speed bumps were probably added because of safety concerns, liability issues or insurance rates. Regardless, the drive is only about 2 tenths of a mile long from driveway to Costco and speed bumps were still required, proving how neglectful we really are in our cars.
Old Town Goleta could make the same mistake that Santa Barbara made. Simply removing traffic from one street and putting it on another, including the freeway, just enforces suburban auto dependent planning.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
January 19, 2010 at 11:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Maybe we could encourage Goleta's Council to take action on some of these resolutions by forwarding this column to them along with a note saying you support action on them. Here are council members' email addresses:
raceves@cityofgoleta.org, mbennett@cityofgoleta.org, mconnell@cityofgoleta.org, eeaston@cityofgoleta.org, eonnen@cityofgoleta.org
infomaniac (anonymous profile)
January 20, 2010 at 2 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Yes, yes, and yes -- almost. Lived, biked, and walked in Goleta for almost 40 years. I stopped bicycling and walking because it's so dangerous. I'd like to return to it.
It's *worse* since the City of Goleta came into being, as they're more concerned about building bureaucracy and fiefdoms than doing the job we elected them for. We *have* a "sign cop," and the main activity seems to be putting out endless notices about 'business X is changing the location and size of their sign,' which is punitive and costly and wasteful to those who play by the rules, and does nothing to stop the proliferation of the junk signs pictured. Smaller, more efficient government, who actually focuses on something other than procedure and paperwork is needed.
Becky (anonymous profile)
January 24, 2010 at 8:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Great article, names most of the major annoyances I as a cyclist & pedestrian experience. I'd add one more: the huge disaster that UCSB did in redesigning El Collegio from Los Carneros into the campus. Not only did they WIDEN the road to 8 lanes (!!) for cars, but they NARROWED and PUT CROSSINGS and SHARP CURVES into the previously straight and crossing-free bike path. Oh they did add a bike lane to the road, but with 4 (I think) long, new, uncoordinated traffic lights, I have never seen a bicyclist using those. What absolute lack of intelligent planning prevailed there! In spite of all those lanes, it's not even car-friendly. Kudos to the car-heads.
hmarcuse (anonymous profile)
January 24, 2010 at 11:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)